Gunnar wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 9:24 pm
Analysis Solves Kirk Case—Evidence Points Away From Robinson’s Position
This was a very interesting analysis by a firearms and forensic specialist. According to him, the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk wound near the chest cavity of his body. According to hit the high velocity bullet could not possibly have been deflected to that position after entering the entry wound in the left side of his lower neck if it had been fired from the position and angle that Tyler Robinson supposedly fired the shot. It would have to have been fired from a location at a higher and very different angle from the line of sight from where Robinson supposedly was. If it had been fired from where originally opposed, there is no way it could have failed to pass clear through Kirk's neck, or could have been deflected sharply enough to wind up where it was found. Also, the huge pressure wave created by the bullet at that location so close to the carotid artery would have instantly stopped and destroyed the heart, explaining why there was so little blood coming out of the entry wound. This makes it seem physically impossible for any shot made by Robinson to have killed Kirk.
So, it is entirely likely that the real shooter has not yet been found. One thing I am sure of, though, that Kash Patel cannot be trusted to claim any conclusion about the shooting that conflicts with Trump wants him to conclude about the shooting and culpability of extreme leftists.
The link is broken.
I have read dozens of these analyses by self-styled experts, mostly contradictory, but all breathlessly announcing that Robinson could not possibly have been the shooter. What none of those folks have is the best evidence of how Robinson was killed — the body. These guys can mouth off all they want, but if the ME found the bullet or bullet fragments inside Kirk’s body, then it was possible. Not only possible, but it happened.
The world is filled with proclamations by self-proclaimed experts that “X is impossible,” when the actual truth is that their understanding of the physical world is incomplete.
We have an entire field of science called “ballistics” that includes what happens to bullets inside bodies. It’s people who shoot real bullets from real guns into animal carcasses. The very little I read from someone who does this for a living (I don’t recall who it was whether I found it), explained that, depending on the type of ammunition, it is completely plausible that the bullet or fragments thereof lodged in or near Kirk’s spine.
My understanding is that what the autopsy showed. But it’s second hand and is muddled because the source tried to turn it into some kind of miracle story. And the story is absurd. Kirk didn’t need to have a super spine. What happened was a whole bunch of contingent factors that combined to produce a low frequency, but entirely plausible outcome.
Many years ago, my family was eating dinner in an Italian restaurant. I was reading her about something, and she picked up her plate of spaghetti and acted as if she was going to hit me in the face with it. Being the smart ass kid that I was, I looked her straight in the eye and said “You. Wouldn’t. Dare.”
The next thing I knew, I had an incoming plate of spaghetti aimed squarely at my face. Out of sheer reflex, I threw my hands up in front of my face and turned my head to the side.
And, when there was no explosion of red sauce, I turned my head back to see the upright plate balanced between the tips of our fingers without a drop of spillage. If you had asked me before, I would have told you it never could have happened. But it did — a combination of contingent events that resulted in an unlikely result.
If you look around, you can find examples everywhere. But we tend to forget them when the event is traumatic, like the Kirk shooting or the collapse of the Twin Towers. How many people, including BYU professor, proclaiming that that was impossible for the planes to have caused the towers to collapse. I highly recommend reminding yourself of that whenever you hear claims made by people that such and such is impossible.
We live in scary times, and more than ever we need each other to keep ourselves sane.
And,
