Voter Fraud

[subgenius]

:: Hair on fire allegation about voter fraud!!1! in a state that doesn’t matter anyway ::

Hey, subs ... do you believe that there was widespread use of narrow and targeted voter fraud in this election?

C’mon, find those l’il balls o’ yours, and take a stand. : D

you referenced a post earlier, and one that i quoted and linked, so how ard you still asking a question that has already been answered...not answered by you of course, but alas - answered nonetheless.

[Gunnar]

you referenced a post earlier, and one that i quoted and linked, so how ard you still asking a question that has already been answered...not answered by you of course, but alas - answered nonetheless.

Why not just answer the question instead of complaining about someone not having seen or acknowledged your previous answer? Are you so embarrassed by your previous answer that you are reluctant to repeat it?

[canpakes]

Hey, subs ... do you believe that there was widespread use of narrow and targeted voter fraud in this election?

C’mon, find those l’il balls o’ yours, and take a stand. : D

you referenced a post earlier, and one that i quoted and linked, so how ard you still asking a question that has already been answered...not answered by you of course, but alas - answered nonetheless.

Nope. You’ve never answered it.

You’ve never been able to outright state that you believe that widespread use of narrow and targeted voter fraud occurred in this election. ; )

[canpakes]

you referenced a post earlier, and one that i quoted and linked, so how ard you still asking a question that has already been answered...not answered by you of course, but alas - answered nonetheless.

Why not just answer the question instead of complaining about someone not having seen or acknowledged your previous answer? Are you so embarrassed by your previous answer that you are reluctant to repeat it?

He never answered it.

He knows that he’s being dishonest, and isn’t going to outright admit it, because he doesn’t believe his own claim.

Good thing he hasn’t ditched his day job to try to start a career in disingenuous propaganda proliferation. It wouldn’t go well.

[Gunnar]

He knows that he’s being dishonest, and isn’t going to outright admit it, because he doesn’t believe his own claim.

Good thing he hasn’t ditched his day job to try to start a career in disingenuous propaganda proliferation. It wouldn’t go well.

I know. His posting behavior on this forum frequently is reminiscent of that of witnesses under oath before a congressional committee trying their best to make their answers ambiguous enough to minimize the chances of being charged with perjury or accidently incriminating themselves. What is he afraid of? That there could somehow be legal consequences for lying to us on this forum? Does he really think there is any danger of embarrassing himself even more than he already has? Does he even understand or care how often and severely he has embarrassed himself?

[subgenius]

you referenced a post earlier, and one that i quoted and linked, so how ard you still asking a question that has already been answered...not answered by you of course, but alas - answered nonetheless.

Nope. You’ve never answered it.

You’ve never been able to outright state that you believe that widespread use of narrow and targeted voter fraud occurred in this election. ; )

Well, if you aren't going to bother to read the post you cite then nothing i can type will satisfy your obsession.
reality= question answered
feel free to quote your cited post of mine and illustrate how the answer has eluded you.
tia.

[canpakes]

Nope. You’ve never answered it.

You’ve never been able to outright state that you believe that widespread use of narrow and targeted voter fraud occurred in this election. ; )

Well, if you aren't going to bother to read the post you cite then nothing i can type will satisfy your obsession.
reality= question answered
feel free to quote your cited post of mine and illustrate how the answer has eluded you.
tia.

You only identified the type of fraud that some folks were alleging. You didn’t say whether or not you believed in that claim yourself.

It’s pretty obvious by how much you fight being straightforward about it that you don’t believe the claim.

[subgenius]

Well, if you aren't going to bother to read the post you cite then nothing i can type will satisfy your obsession.
reality= question answered
feel free to quote your cited post of mine and illustrate how the answer has eluded you.
tia.

You only identified the type of fraud that some folks were alleging. You didn’t say whether or not you believed in that claim yourself.

It’s pretty obvious by how much you fight being straightforward about it that you don’t believe the claim.

Again, since my quote of your cited post wasn't sufficient for your purpose, feel free to link/quote it and then revisit my inquiry on how your question is incoherent- yet you insist upon a clear answer to your garbled question.

[canpakes]

You only identified the type of fraud that some folks were alleging. You didn’t say whether or not you believed in that claim yourself.

It’s pretty obvious by how much you fight being straightforward about it that you don’t believe the claim.

Again, since my quote of your cited post wasn't sufficient for your purpose, feel free to link/quote it and then revisit my inquiry on how your question is incoherent- yet you insist upon a clear answer to your garbled question.

No problem. You can check back in on page 3, when I asked ajax a simple question:

Voter fraud does have more to do with the bias and influence of the mainstream media. Ben Shapiro pointed out that in spite of their obvious partisan stance, mainstream media is still worth 10 to 15% points in US elections.

Feel free to post examples of this widespread voter fraud, when you’re ready.

... to which you jumped in with this ‘clarification’ of fraud type:

As uncomfortable as it is to stand more adjacent to Ajax than to...well, than to almost anyone else except Schmo or Icarus/Hawkeye/KG - I must interject.
Not widespread, but rather narrow and targeted.

OK. Feel free to post examples of this widespread use of narrow and targeted voter fraud, when you’re ready.

First fail for you: if it involves 5 or 6 states and 7.5 million voters, as the Trump Base asserts, it’s going to be ‘widespread’. But I can run with your misinterpretation of the original question, and we can use ‘narrow and targeted’ to talk about the type of the supposed fraud.

As you then failed to give any examples of the claimed fraud aside from innuendo (at least ajax tried to, with his since-debunked claim of 4 dead voters in GA), I just ended up asking you if you even believe that widespread use of narrow and targeted voter fraud occurred.

You’ve now failed to answer that question, because it’ll expose you to be nothing more than a bad propagandist who doesn’t believe the BS he’s pushing.

Hey, it’s a simple enough question. I had no idea that it would cause you to exhibit so much fail. : )

[subgenius]

Again, since my quote of your cited post wasn't sufficient for your purpose, feel free to link/quote it and then revisit my inquiry on how your question is incoherent- yet you insist upon a clear answer to your garbled question.

No problem. You can check back in on page 3, when I asked ajax a simple question:

Feel free to post examples of this widespread voter fraud, when you’re ready.

... to which you jumped in with this ‘clarification’ of fraud type:

OK. Feel free to post examples of this widespread use of narrow and targeted voter fraud, when you’re ready.

First fail for you: if it involves 5 or 6 states and 7.5 million voters, as the Trump Base asserts, it’s going to be ‘widespread’. But I can run with your misinterpretation of the original question, and we can use ‘narrow and targeted’ to talk about the type of the supposed fraud.

As you then failed to give any examples of the claimed fraud aside from innuendo (at least ajax tried to, with his since-debunked claim of 4 dead voters in GA), I just ended up asking you if you even believe that widespread use of narrow and targeted voter fraud occurred.

You’ve now failed to answer that question, because it’ll expose you to be nothing more than a bad propagandist who doesn’t believe the BS he’s pushing.

Hey, it’s a simple enough question. I had no idea that it would cause you to exhibit so much fail. : )

not widespread