doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 9:32 pm
That's the same thing that many Christian and Mormon converts say. They live a wild life when they are young, but turn to the Lord when they get older. How convenient is it to learn when you are less attractive?
I don't think I understand your question.
We all learn, but older men are pickier than older women.
You already told us that. Several times. Why repeat it?
On average, men over 40 are pickier than women over 40. For example, men over 40 tend to look for a younger partner than their ex.
There are evolutionary imperatives for both standards. Biologically, women are compelled to invest much, much more time and resources into child-rearing than men are. Therefore, they must ensure that the sperm they harvest have the greatest likelihood of resulting in offspring that survive. That means "pickiness" because she must hedge her bets by mating with the champion. That's why 20% of men have 80% of the sex. Women over 40 can afford to be much less picky than younger women because their childbearing years are behind them and therefore don't need to be so selective about whose sperm they intake.
Men, on the other hand, have a much greater likelihood of dying young. For most of our history this was because men hunted large prey up close and personal, whereas nowadays they get interested in wars and fast cars. Therefore, they can't afford to be so picky because they have to spread their sperm as far and wide as possible to ensure that their genes have a chance to pass on to the next generation. Only once they've proven they can survive do they have the luxury of trying to impregnate only the females who have the most desirable genetic profiles.
So, it's useless for you to argue against or get upset about mating strategies that evolved over hundreds of thousands, if not millions of years.
You are basically saying that having high standards is a mistake.
If one is looking for true, heartfelt love--a luxury that humans have only been able to enjoy since the agricultural revolution, if not even later--then yes, having high standards based on physicality alone is a mistake. If one is obeying one's evolutionarily-implanted biological imperatives, then it isn't, since there are perfectly logical historical reasons for them.