But since you chose that word, what is the acceptable amount of actual voter fraud required to make you join the effort to tarnish the processes in place as fundamentally flawed, with results that are guaranteed to be unreliable and incorrect?
Well a phony dossier paid for by the Clinton campaign was enough to claim our elections were decided by Vladimir Putin rather than American voter in 2016.
Unfortunately we will soon have a president who more than likely is financially compromised to China, the Ukraine, and who knows how many other foreign countries from his 47 year history in the swamp. Democrats elites better dump all their cash into Georgia and hope to see back many more mail in ballots than they ever send out, along with record numbers of California liberals moving in to Georgia to vote in the runoff election. If the Republican party maintains control of the Senate, the Hunter Biden laptop issue might not be so easily suppressed by Google, Facebook, Twitter, and the mainstream media. Perhaps progressives will go ahead and put Joe Biden in the ground at that point anyway.
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
I’m fairly certain if there proof of ‘targeted’ election fraud we’d see it posted right here. Right? Like. Instead of spending a few pages on wild conspiracy theories Xanax would actually post something, right?
And in the most unsurprising thing to come out of this delusion, “... As The Associated Press reported, the lawsuits have “proved a disaster in court, where judges uniformly rejected their claims of vote fraud and found the campaign’s legal work amateurish.” Legal briefs have been littered with typos, misspellings and embarrassing mistakes like referring to a “Second Amendment Complaint” instead of a second amended complaint.“
But since you chose that word, what is the acceptable amount of actual voter fraud required to make you join the effort to tarnish the processes in place as fundamentally flawed, with results that are guaranteed to be unreliable and incorrect?
Well a phony dossier paid for by the Clinton campaign was enough to claim our elections were decided by Vladimir Putin rather than American voter in 2016.
Unfortunately we will soon have a president who more than likely is financially compromised to China, the Ukraine, and who knows how many other foreign countries from his 47 year history in the swamp. Democrats elites better dump all their cash into Georgia and hope to see back many more mail in ballots than they ever send out, along with record numbers of California liberals moving in to Georgia to vote in the runoff election. If the Republican party maintains control of the Senate, the Hunter Biden laptop issue might not be so easily suppressed by Google, Facebook, Twitter, and the mainstream media. Perhaps progressives will go ahead and put Joe Biden in the ground at that point anyway.
OK, now you’re just rambling in an attempt to dodge giving any answer. Not that this is unexpected, but maybe I can push this along a step farther to see if you can commit to any particular metric of the skepticism that you are so eager to promote:
Does an unsubstantiated account of 25 supposedly dead folks (some whom, upon investigation, are actually alive) out of 150 million votes cast represent the line in the sand required to make you join the effort to tarnish the processes in place as fundamentally flawed, with results that are guaranteed to be unreliable and incorrect?
Last edited by canpakes on Thu Nov 26, 2020 6:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Anyone see this video of Trump pardoning the Turkey in 2018 and then joking about the losing turkey "Carrots?"
Truth is stranger than fiction.
First he says that it was a fair election and Carrots lost. "This was a fair election... unfortunately, Carrots refused to concede and demanded a recount."
"We're still fighting with Carrots. And I will tell you, we've come to a conclusion: Carrots, I'm sorry to tell you, the results did not change. Too bad for Carrots."
I’m fairly certain if there proof of ‘targeted’ election fraud we’d see it posted right here. Right? Like. Instead of spending a few pages on wild conspiracy theories Xanax would actually post something, right?
- Doc
Yeah, just ask the Republican election observers to tell us what they saw from 100 yards away in Philadelphia. According to the Democrat controlled state government 100 yards away means both sides get to see the votes being counted as the law states. So why 100 yards away now and not in the same room? Oh, we're scared of getting Covid. No fraud here, otherwise the partisan observers should have seen it.
What do you in Wayne County Michigan when you realize your voter turnout is higher than the number of registered votes and you want to adjust the vote count and there's these pesky Republican voters observing through a window as the law allows them to do? Just cover up the windows.
This was no free and fair election as called for in the Constitution.
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
