Jersey Girl wrote:During the time you spent posting this afternoon (and I think you're still on the board as I write this) you could have had a session of professional therapy.
Yea. I may soon sleep with a 46 year old woman.
Jersey Girl wrote:During the time you spent posting this afternoon (and I think you're still on the board as I write this) you could have had a session of professional therapy.
DoubtingThomas wrote:Jersey Girl wrote:During the time you spent posting this afternoon (and I think you're still on the board as I write this) you could have had a session of professional therapy.
Yea. I may soon sleep with a 46 year old woman.
Jersey Girl wrote:How is that a response to the above statement?
DoubtingThomas wrote:Jersey Girl wrote:During the time you spent posting this afternoon (and I think you're still on the board as I write this) you could have had a session of professional therapy.
Yea. I may soon sleep with a 46 year old woman.
DoubtingThomas wrote:Jersey Girl wrote:How is that a response to the above statement?
I do need some therapy.
Jersey Girl wrote:How is that a response to my asking you how that is a response to my statement?
I'm not being facetious here. I'm asking you how in the hell you think you are responding to what folks are saying to you.
Because you are not.
Jersey Girl wrote:Jersey Girl wrote:How is that a response to my asking you how that is a response to my statement?
I'm not being facetious here. I'm asking you how in the hell you think you are responding to what folks are saying to you.
Because you are not.
The ability to engage in brief two-person exchanges is something we document on three and four year old developmental assessments.
You are not showing that you can even do it in writing.
Jersey Girl wrote:You are not showing that you can even do it in written communication with other adults where you have time to read, think and respond.
And yet you think you want to enter into a relationship with a woman.
Perfume on my Mind wrote:I don't think you're emotionally ready for intimacy, frankly.
Analytics wrote: Being a helpless, whiny, needy, wimp is incredibly unattractive. If he is miserable in his own skin, why would anybody else want to join him?
Analytics wrote:It doesn't really matter whether he fantasies about a young beautiful virgin or an older more interesting individual.
Perfume on my Mind wrote:What's the fascination with virgins? What are you, from the 16th century or something? "Virgin" is a another word for young and inexperienced.
Perfume on my Mind wrote: is looking for real answers
Chap wrote:How about just not bothering about him? Noe of this seems to be going anywhere interesting, does it?
Dr. Shades wrote:I think this may be the root of your problem: Your goal is to take, not to give. If you want a healthy relationship, it must be the other way around.
Jersey Girl wrote:That's not perverse.![]()
Lemmie wrote:Well that settles it. A creepy fake.