George Zimmerman: "Head Wound" Photos and Methamphetamine

[_Analytics]

I've never claimed any such thing. I said that this mentality, and these techniques of public character assassination and intellectual lynching based on scant or nonexistent evidence are the classic tactics of the authoritarian/totalitarian Left, which you and a number of others here well represent.

Simply not believing Zimmerman per se was not a part of that criticism.

Just to be clear, do you think that the State of Florida's prosecution of Zimmerman is based on "scant or nonexistent evidence," and that the interpretation of the events that they've espoused and released constitutes "public character assassination and intellectual lynching?"

For my part, I simply give more weight to the judgment of the original detective and the prosecutors than I do to the commentators on Fox news. The original detective who thought Zimmerman was guilty of manslaughter knew what his face looked like in much more detail than the "new" evidence from your racist blogs.

[_ajax18]

I don't see where Zimmerman has a legal duty not to follow somebody. What if it were the other way around? What if I didn't like some negroes following me? They'd say it was my responsibility not to jog in that area, whether I was 14, 30, or 60 years old. If I went and started to beat one of them up, it'd be my fault if I got shot.

The law sure isn't colorblind. In fact it's completely reverse racist. A lot of that is because blacks are more willing to revolt, loot stores, and destroy cities if they don't get their way. Since whites aren't willing to do this, it should be no surprise to see our rights eroded away. The beauty of this for me is that white people have managed to leave the situation. Now the browns are getting a taste of living in a racist society. I hope they enjoy it.

[_Eric]

Are Mormons Racist?

I don't see where Zimmerman has a legal duty not to follow somebody. What if it were the other way around? What if I didn't like some negroes following me? They'd say it was my responsibility not to jog in that area, whether I was 14, 30, or 60 years old. If I went and started to beat one of them up, it'd be my fault if I got shot.

The law sure isn't colorblind. In fact it's completely reverse racist. A lot of that is because blacks are more willing to revolt, loot stores, and destroy cities if they don't get their way. Since whites aren't willing to do this, it should be no surprise to see our rights eroded away. The beauty of this for me is that white people have managed to leave the situation. Now the browns are getting a taste of living in a racist society. I hope they enjoy it.

[_ajax18]

Eric, unlike Bill Clinton, you won't profit from black power either. Neither do black people themselves. They merely reap the results of life in a society that is incapable and unwilling to respect an objective rule of law. It's called black on black crime. Nor will the United States be much different in the future from the Latin American countries George Zimmerman came from.

Secondly, I'm no longer Mormon so quit playing that card and blaming the church for my opinions.

I'm the last of a dying breed. Like Ether, I'm simply taking note as I watch my civilization be destroyed.

[_Analytics]

I don't see where Zimmerman has a legal duty not to follow somebody. What if it were the other way around? What if I didn't like some negroes following me?

Let's follow through on what you are suggesting here. The hypothetical scenario is that you are walking home from a convenience store with some candy and soda. You are talking to your girlfriend about how you are scared that an angry black guy is following you. She tells you to run, which you do. The black guy starts running after you.

He catches you, you confront each other, a fight ensues, you land a couple of punches, and he pulls out a gun and shoots you dead.

In an ideal world governed by the objective rule of law, what should happen to the black guy that shot you? If I understand your position, you are suggesting that if this were to happen, the black man would be able to shoot the unarmed white guy, call it self-defense, and walk.

Do I have this right?

[_Eric]

Secondly, I'm no longer Mormon so quit playing that card and blaming the church for my opinions.