Hound has questions!

[canpakes]

Is it relevant to the topic?

You initiated this thread to defend your progressive friend Some Schmo and to eliminate my image from his thread without appearing overly confrontational.

Nope. I moved your derail to its own new thread, because it was … a derail.

Now you can post to your heart’s content in this thread, so long as you aren’t violating the rules of the board.

What a great solution, right? : )

[Hound of Heaven]

That's amusing, even for someone like Schmo, who appears incapable of laughter.

*points at HoH and laughs*

I've been laughing at your pathetic behavior in this thread for a few days now. It's hilarious to me how important the weak point you're making is to you.

I also think it's funny that you think you're fooling anyone (except ceeboo, but as we know, he isn't that bright).

I’ve never reached a point of such dissatisfaction with my life that I would resort to visiting a message board to personally attack someone for their differing political views.

The more you share, the more I find myself thinking it might be a mental concern, perhaps something beyond your control.

Are you unaware that you harbor disdain for anyone and anything that doesn't align with your beliefs or expectations?

Please revisit your post for a thorough review. You remind me of a male version of Sunny Hostin from the TV show The View.

Just so you’re aware, it’s clear to everyone why you opt to share your personal insults in Spirit Paradise rather than in Spirit Prison. Once more, it reflects your mental state, you seem intent on causing the greatest pain to Ceeboo while seeking the widest audience to witness the negativity you express.

Spirit Paradise permits nonmembers to observe your outbursts, whereas posting in Spirit Prison restricts your rants to just a few members. Once again, this serves as further evidence that your heated outbursts are a means of release for you.

It seems that you resort to insulting others as a way to alleviate the pain you are experiencing. You belittle Ceeboo because it brings you a fleeting sense of satisfaction, knowing that someone else might share in your misery, if only for the brief moment he absorbs your words.

You derive pleasure from inflicting suffering on others. Congratulations!

[Some Schmo]

I’ve never reached a point of such dissatisfaction with my life that I would resort to visiting a message board to personally attack someone for their differing political views.

Then why are you doing that?

[Molok]

I’ve never reached a point of such dissatisfaction with my life that I would resort to visiting a message board to personally attack someone for their differing political views.

Lol? That's an obvious lie.

[canpakes]

*points at HoH and laughs*

I've been laughing at your pathetic behavior in this thread for a few days now. It's hilarious to me how important the weak point you're making is to you.

I also think it's funny that you think you're fooling anyone (except ceeboo, but as we know, he isn't that bright).

I’ve never reached a point of such dissatisfaction with my life that I would resort to visiting a message board to personally attack someone for their differing political views.

The more you share, the more I find myself thinking it might be a mental concern, perhaps something beyond your control.

Are you unaware that you harbor disdain for anyone and anything that doesn't align with your beliefs or expectations?

Please revisit your post for a thorough review. You remind me of a male version of Sunny Hostin from the TV show The View.

Just so you’re aware, it’s clear to everyone why you opt to share your personal insults in Spirit Paradise rather than in Spirit Prison. Once more, it reflects your mental state, you seem intent on causing the greatest pain to Ceeboo while seeking the widest audience to witness the negativity you express.

Spirit Paradise permits nonmembers to observe your outbursts, whereas posting in Spirit Prison restricts your rants to just a few members. Once again, this serves as further evidence that your heated outbursts are a means of release for you.

It seems that you resort to insulting others as a way to alleviate the pain you are experiencing. You belittle Ceeboo because it brings you a fleeting sense of satisfaction, knowing that someone else might share in your misery, if only for the brief moment he absorbs your words.

You derive pleasure from inflicting suffering on others. Congratulations!

Condensed version: “Let me show you how insulted I am that you insulted someone, by insulting you multiple times!”

Why does it always end up that the loudest complainers are the worst offenders?
; )

[Some Schmo]

I’ve never reached a point of such dissatisfaction with my life that I would resort to visiting a message board to personally attack someone for their differing political views.

Lol? That's an obvious lie.

I'm amused that he thinks the motivation for my criticisms is "differing political views," like character and a disagreement about baseline facts are not the primary factors in the equation.

[canpakes]

You initiated this thread to defend your progressive friend Some Schmo and to eliminate my image from his thread without appearing overly confrontational.

Binger would erase his posts.

According to Hound, he apparently must have been very afraid of appearing incredibly absurd, amongst other adjectives.

[Hound of Heaven]

Markk, you should shut the “F” up. You sound like a moron. If you keep talking this way, people will know you're a moron. Is that what you want?

You probably don't care. Moron's aren't known to take care of their reputation, so I don't expect you will be the exception.

Canpakes. I recognize that you may find it challenging to interpret images without being accompanied with text, so I am offering a statement to clarify the meaning behind this image specifically for you. It depicts Kamala Harris gently cradling a baby Homer Simpson. In this instance, Simpson embodies the archetype of Some Schmo, reflecting his dismissive attitude towards those who challenge his absurd worldview and highlighting the fortunate reality that we can freely express differing opinions. Anyone with a functioning mind recognizes how misguided it is to label those who hold differing opinions as fundamentally flawed simply because they adhere to their own beliefs. Unfortunately, the only political movement I am aware of at present that seems to be fueled by animosity is within my cherished Democratic party, specifically the progressive movement. The American electorate perceives them as mere infants.

Hi, Hound. Since this post is specifically directed towards me and relating to this thread, while not addressing any content of the thread you left it in or engaging any other person you’re referring to, I’ve bumped it over into this thread that specifically discusses your complaint. Carry on. Thanks! -c-

[Molok]

Canpakes. I recognize that you may find it challenging to interpret images without being accompanied with text, so I am offering a statement to clarify the meaning behind this image specifically for you. It depicts Kamala Harris gently cradling a baby Homer Simpson. In this instance, Simpson embodies the archetype of Some Schmo, reflecting his dismissive attitude towards those who challenge his absurd worldview and highlighting the fortunate reality that we can freely express differing opinions. Anyone with a functioning mind recognizes how misguided it is to label those who hold differing opinions as fundamentally flawed simply because they adhere to their own beliefs. Unfortunately, the only political movement I am aware of at present that seems to be fueled by animosity is within my cherished Democratic party, specifically the progressive movement. The American electorate perceives them as mere infants.

This is what I can't stand about the regressives who have taken control of the Democrat party. Constant word policing and purity tests. Always coddling, refusing to grow up and face the world. They'd rather focus on inconsequential things like images that offend them, rather than tackle the real issues affecting the world.

[Morley]

Hound, your arguments are as realistic as your depiction of what you seem to think are Kamala Harris's hands and Baby Schmo's feet.