Pedo Epidemic in MAGA

[Gunnar]

Some offender stats from the "Who's Making the News" project's compilation of over 10,000 sex crimes against children from 2/10/23 through 5/23/24.

Drag Queens: 1
Transgender Persons: 5
Republican Politicians: 60
Democrat Politicians: 12
Ordained Religious (pastors, priests, etc.): 578. If you include non-ordained things like Christian youth group leaders, the number jumps to 846.

Of the 10 states with the highest per capita rates of sex crimes against children, 9 of them are Republican states. Of the 10 states that have the lowest per capita rates of sex crimes against children, every single one is a Democrat state.

Very interesting, but not very surprising--to me.

[Dr. Shades]

Fr. Check this out, it’s a focus group of MAGAts listening, unbeknownst to them, to horrible and fake Dump recordings:

https://www.reddit.com/r/thescoop/comme ... are_button

Although the reactions were utterly regretful, you have to admit that the fake quotes themselves were funny as Hell.

[Kishkumen]

Some offender stats from the "Who's Making the News" project's compilation of over 10,000 sex crimes against children from 2/10/23 through 5/23/24.

Drag Queens: 1
Transgender Persons: 5
Republican Politicians: 60
Democrat Politicians: 12
Ordained Religious (pastors, priests, etc.): 578. If you include non-ordained things like Christian youth group leaders, the number jumps to 846.

Of the 10 states with the highest per capita rates of sex crimes against children, 9 of them are Republican states. Of the 10 states that have the lowest per capita rates of sex crimes against children, every single one is a Democrat state.

Horrifying. Keep your kids far away from church.

[Gunnar]

Fr. Check this out, it’s a focus group of MAGAts listening, unbeknownst to them, to horrible and fake Dump recordings:

https://www.reddit.com/r/thescoop/comme ... are_button

This is who they are. This is why HeilHitler18 and SeeBoob can keep going. This why I call them Unreachables.

- Doc

The saddest thing about it, if you'll notice, is that nobody questioned whether it was real. They all seemed to know what Idiot is really like, that the things said were plausible given his personality, and they like it.

Yes. That is what makes it so depressing! I'm sure those same people would be screaming for the prosecution and imprisonment of anyone other than Trump whom they believed to have said the same things.

[Dr Exiled]

I really don't care if you think I am credible or not or if you take me seriously. You can go f___ yourself for all I care. So, whatever. Agree with it or don't or don't comment. And you really aren't the judge of credibility and so perhaps stop acting like you are. Frankly, your thinking is overly emotional. You let the specter of Trump and how he makes you wet your pants cloud your thinking on this. Perhaps both candidates were poor choices? Ever thought of that one?

I may be emotional, but you’re an effing dumbass.

Would Harris be violating the Constitution left and right? Would we be on the verge of war with Iran? Would we be in the middle of a stupid trade war right now?

Damn, dude. Think.

Harris would have followed her puppet masters and we would have been in the same place with Israel/Iran because AIPAC controls practically all of our politicians. You're falling for the same nonsense the two party system gives us election after election where we have a choice between two bozos. Just another emotional response.

[Chap]

Harris would have followed her puppet masters ...

In my experience, phrases like that rarely occur in attempts to make objective assessments of the likely behaviour of a person appointed to high office.

[Everybody Wang Chung]

[Dr Exiled]

Harris would have followed her puppet masters ...

In my experience, phrases like that rarely occur in attempts to make objective assessments of the likely behaviour of a person appointed to high office.

Thank you for correcting the record.

[Chap]

Harris would have followed her puppet masters ...

In my experience, phrases like that rarely occur in attempts to make objective assessments of the likely behaviour of a person appointed to high office.

Thank you for correcting the record.

To clarify - my initial post should have been enlarged slightly to include a qualification:

In my experience, phrases like that rarely occur in serious attempts to make objective assessments of the likely behaviour of a person appointed to high office.

[Kishkumen]

Harris would have followed her puppet masters and we would have been in the same place with Israel/Iran because AIPAC controls practically all of our politicians. You're falling for the same nonsense the two party system gives us election after election where we have a choice between two bozos. Just another emotional response.

LOL!!! Well, we'll never know. I doubt it. There was no drumbeat to bomb Iran from a Democratic administration in recent memory. Trump always had a few people on the payroll who were giddy to attack Iran, and Republicans have been saber rattling against Iran since the '90s.

I understand the "both sides are awful" mantra, but when you take it to the degree of saying "both sides are awful in exactly the same ways," you've lost me. History shows that both sides are not awful in exactly the same ways.