honorentheos wrote:Or, you know, how you go about it is important and should be scalable accordingly. That might be part of this you're missing. But somehow I doubt you disagree in most instances so much as you still can't just say, "Yeah, I should have been more careful before I spoke out on the original video."
Here's what I said in response to the original video:
Yeah, this was one of the worst "feel bad" videos I've seen in some time. It's not objectively the worst story out there, but the symbolism is appalling on a level that is difficult to take in.
followed immediately by:
Well, I hope his life isn't destroyed because he made some very poor choices when he was a teenager. Social media infamy justice can get disproportionate very quickly.
In an ideal world, I'd hope something would click in his head to make him feel tremendous shame, followed by some soul-searching, and eventual contrition.
Yeah, I think that still holds just fine. The symbolism of a bunch of white teens joyously racially taunting an older Native American while one stares him down, in Washington D.C. of all places, is pretty ugly. Again, what was bad about the original video release still exists in all the added context. That's what is bananas about the narrative some people have developed that they were completely exonerated simply because the teens also didn't do other bad things that people assumed and/or claimed they did.
If I didn't know any better, it would appear you lumped me in with some amorphous group of over-reactors while not reading the content of what I said. The only consequence I felt was proportionate to the offense was shame and contrition.