Here’s an interesting tidbit from the Washington Post:
Bill Davis, a veteran film-set armorer, said Saturday that it was almost certain that Hutchins had been killed by a bullet. Blanks fire wax plugs, he said, which dissolve from the heat of firing and would not be able to penetrate a bone or inner organ — though at a distance of under 20 feet, particles from a blank can cause skin and eye damage.
So, questions. Why was there live ammo on the set at all? How could the same thing have happened three times? I don’t want to jump to conclusions, but I might be smelling a rat.
he/him we all just have to live through it,
holding each other’s hands.
So, questions. Why was there live ammo on the set at all? How could the same thing have happened three times? I don’t want to jump to conclusions, but I might be smelling a rat.
The alt-right is already running with a conspiracy theory that the victim was related to the Clintons' enemies
So, questions. Why was there live ammo on the set at all? How could the same thing have happened three times? I don’t want to jump to conclusions, but I might be smelling a rat.
The alt-right is already running with a conspiracy theory that the victim was related to the Clintons' enemies
Totally. But unfortunately, the alt-left is already running a conspiracy conspiracy theory theory that the victim was related to the Clinton’s enemies.
The alt-right is already running with a conspiracy theory that the victim was related to the Clintons' enemies
Totally. But unfortunately, the alt-left is already running a conspiracy conspiracy theory theory that the victim was related to the Clinton’s enemies.
Got this off an alt-right website. I'm sure it was an alt-left plant
Screenshot 2021-10-23 164340.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Just to be clear here. I am not a lawyer. I love wombats. Thanks for the prize.
Descriptions and definitions of accidents may apply here, but, again, the discharge of the gun, to me, was no accident. An accident can coexist with negligence.
In my opinion, this is all gross negligence, including gross negligence on the part of the shooter. He pointed it, he pulled the trigger, he shot a loaded gun.
In my opinion, this is all gross negligence, including gross negligence on the part of the shooter. He pointed it, he pulled the trigger, he shot a loaded gun.
I'm going to say that it's negligence on the part of the shooter if he were acting outside of established protocols on set.
LIGHT HAS A NAME
We only get stronger when we are lifting something that is heavier than what we are used to. ~ KF
Just to be clear here. I am not a lawyer. I love wombats. Thanks for the prize.
Descriptions and definitions of accidents may apply here, but, again, the discharge of the gun, to me, was no accident. An accident can coexist with negligence.
In my opinion, this is all gross negligence, including gross negligence on the part of the shooter. He pointed it, he pulled the trigger, he shot a loaded gun.
You’re welcome. I’m reserving judgment on negligence until I understand the circumstances under which the shooting occurred. They were apparently rehearsing a scene. The victims weren’t in the scene. The director is the person who sets up the shot. So, why was anyone downgrade of the shot? How close were they to Baldwin? Did he actually know they were in the line of fire? Did he intend to pull the trigger as a rehearsal of the shot? Was he joking around? Was he concentrating on some part of the scene and accidentally pulled the trigger? It’s an odd set of facts, and there’s too much missing information for me to make a call at this point.
he/him we all just have to live through it,
holding each other’s hands.
In my opinion, this is all gross negligence, including gross negligence on the part of the shooter. He pointed it, he pulled the trigger, he shot a loaded gun.
I'm going to say that it's negligence on the part of the shooter if he were acting outside of established protocols on set.
I think that’s fair. A reasonable person when handling a firearm on a movie set would follow the safety rules or protocols. Regardless of rules or protocols, if Baldwin intentionally pulled the trigger knowing that the gun was aimed at anyone, I’d argue he was negligent. in my opinion, a reasonable person would never intentionally pull the trigger while the gun is aimed at another person.
he/him we all just have to live through it,
holding each other’s hands.
Just to be clear here. I am not a lawyer. I love wombats. Thanks for the prize.
Descriptions and definitions of accidents may apply here, but, again, the discharge of the gun, to me, was no accident. An accident can coexist with negligence.
In my opinion, this is all gross negligence, including gross negligence on the part of the shooter. He pointed it, he pulled the trigger, he shot a loaded gun.
You’re welcome. I’m reserving judgment on negligence until I understand the circumstances under which the shooting occurred. They were apparently rehearsing a scene. The victims weren’t in the scene. The director is the person who sets up the shot. So, why was anyone downgrade of the shot? How close were they to Baldwin? Did he actually know they were in the line of fire? Did he intend to pull the trigger as a rehearsal of the shot? Was he joking around? Was he concentrating on some part of the scene and accidentally pulled the trigger? It’s an odd set of facts, and there’s too much missing information for me to make a call at this point.
Did the director want to kill the cinematographer, load the guns with live rounds, and used Alec Baldwin to do the deed?
Sorry, I apparently spend too much time on crime cases.
LIGHT HAS A NAME
We only get stronger when we are lifting something that is heavier than what we are used to. ~ KF
