Please, Do NOT Speak Freely on This Forum

[Binger]

Outer Darkness

Can you even track a subject in a conversation Binger?

What do you mean?

[K Graham]

Can you even track a subject in a conversation Binger?

What do you mean?

He probably means you're always running interference for the Right on threads dedicated to subjects that make you uncomfortable. You and AM both seem to have only one purpose here. Your recent 2,100+ word cut and paste job about car manufacturing on a thread about white crimes against black people is a textbook example. Your intent is to squash all legitimate discussion about any given subject by bombarding a thread with repeated, longwinded rants that make following the discussion impossible.

[Philo Sofee]

Can you even track a subject in a conversation Binger?

What do you mean?

Thank you for making my point with your question. I already knew you couldn't, but I wanted to give you a chance to prove it, which you admirably did with grace and aplomb. (Need me to look up those words in a dictionary and read their definitions to you also?)

[Binger]

What do you mean?

Thank you for making my point with your question. I already knew you couldn't, but I wanted to give you a chance to prove it, which you admirably did with grace and aplomb. (Need me to look up those words in a dictionary and read their definitions to you also?)

Would you mind?

[Philo Sofee]

What do you mean?

He probably means you're always running interference for the Right on threads dedicated to subjects that make you uncomfortable. You and AM both seem to have only one purpose here. Your recent 2,100+ word cut and paste job about car manufacturing on a thread about white crimes against black people is a textbook example. Your intent is to squash all legitimate discussion about any given subject by bombarding a thread with repeated, longwinded rants that make following the discussion impossible.

Ah, now this is a textbook example of grasping the point, of actual understanding for you Binger. K.Graham didn't even have to spend 10 seconds on it to come to a simple almost kindergarten level understanding which, obviously, from your post Binger, entirely escaped you. My suggestion, sincerely, is that you pay more attention to what K.Graham says since he is rather spot on and quite coherent (sorry for the big words which the rest of us grasp, again I offer my services to you Binger of looking up the words in a dictionary and reading out their meanings to you if that would help).

[Philo Sofee]

Thank you for making my point with your question. I already knew you couldn't, but I wanted to give you a chance to prove it, which you admirably did with grace and aplomb. (Need me to look up those words in a dictionary and read their definitions to you also?)

Would you mind?

If you are over 9 years old, then yes I would. Put your big boy pants on and actually do something in favor of your mind for once instead of repeating mantra stupidity from news channels which do not enlighten us on anything. That could be a very credible start for your learning how to comprehend the influences of information coming within your cranium.

[Marcus]

Exactly. And I completely agree with your comment about Canpakes's tolerance level. When binger started his rant about Canpakes being unfair, I posted my take on it for Shades:


Binger's assessment of the moderation here is bizarre and completely baseless.

I know, it was actually your very sane, intelligent and coherent post that caused me to write mine Marcus.

Thank you! I'm just happy to see others also countering the nonsense about moderation that binger is shoveling at shades. He really has a skewed view of the world around him. (or he doesn't and he is consciously doing what sociopathic trolls do all over the internet--revel in attempting to destroy communities and disrupt communications. who knows. )

[Binger]

I know, it was actually your very sane, intelligent and coherent post that caused me to write mine Marcus.

Thank you! I'm just happy to see others also countering the nonsense about moderation that binger is shoveling at shades. He really has a skewed view of the world around him. (or he doesn't and he is consciously doing what sociopathic trolls do all over the internet--revel in attempting to destroy communities and disrupt communications. who knows. )

Philo, you sure you want this alliance? Think hard here. Pay attention.

[Marcus]

Pay attention.

Keep saying that to yourself. Here's a place to start:

He probably means you're always running interference for the Right on threads dedicated to subjects that make you uncomfortable. You and AM both seem to have only one purpose here. Your recent 2,100+ word cut and paste job about car manufacturing on a thread about white crimes against black people is a textbook example. Your intent is to squash all legitimate discussion about any given subject by bombarding a thread with repeated, longwinded rants that make following the discussion impossible.

Ah, now this is a textbook example of grasping the point, of actual understanding for you Binger. K.Graham didn't even have to spend 10 seconds on it to come to a simple almost kindergarten level understanding which, obviously, from your post Binger, entirely escaped you. My suggestion, sincerely, is that you pay more attention to what K.Graham says since he is rather spot on and quite coherent (sorry for the big words which the rest of us grasp, again I offer my services to you Binger of looking up the words in a dictionary and reading out their meanings to you if that would help).

[canpakes]

It’s pretty much all that you’re able to do.

Hey, remember when I asked you - several times - for a link back to any one of those threads that you claimed to have started … yet you weren’t able to give an example of even one?

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=154676

Good times. ; )

Do you remember how much you damned lie?

Remind me. Link to some examples.

I'll go grab some popcorn while you tacitly admit that you have none, and deflect again. BRB.