Alter Idem wrote:Thama wrote:Nevertheless, he has campaigned as a typical (or even hypertypical) Republican, and I couldn't disagree more strongly on Palin. That was a cynical, insulting move.
Huh? It's clear from Republican voter reaction that Sarah Palin was THE BEST choice for the ticket. McCain's base was not happy with his liberal record. He needed a conservative on the ticket and he gave us one. We also got a person who has a strong record of fighting corruption, even within our own party--so I'd say McCain hit a homerun-with one choice, he's energized the Republican base and gained their firm support.
You called it "cynical and insulting" to put Palin on the ticket. I'm curious how you see Obama's choice of Biden. Was it "cynical and insulting" as well?
It was the best choice to shore up the fundamentalist base of the Republican party. It was a piss-poor choice for forming a competent government, and for having a VP in office who had the capacity to be an effective president.
That's why it's cynical and insulting--it was purely a campaign decision, but could have real effects well into the next 8 years. Biden was precisely the opposite choice. He's not very exciting, he's prone to gaffes on the campaign trail (as many here have noted), and his own campaign has flopped miserably multiple times. He is, however, a knowledgeable, stable, effective politician with a skillset in foreign policy ideally suited to the nation's most urgent problems. Biden was a poor campaign decision, but a great governing decision. Should Obama die or resign in the middle of a term, most people here and abroad wouldn't have cause to say "Oh, S***, we're screwed". I don't think we can say the same for McCain.