Republicans have to Cheat to Win

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_canpakes
_Emeritus
Posts: 8541
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:54 am

Re: Republicans have to Cheat to Win

Post by _canpakes »

subgenius wrote:What is missing now, among Democrats, is any semblance of a coherent policy agenda directed to the future. Partisan anger is not an agenda. Positive, practical policy proposals constitute an agenda. To get started: peace, prosperity and justice. How can Americans of all parties and persuasions get there together?

The answer is simple. Just pray harder (choose a Christian faith, please), cut social spending and eliminate regulations if they’re regulations.

Big Business will take care of all of these issues if we can just imagine the right profit motive.
_Water Dog
_Emeritus
Posts: 1798
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:10 am

Re: Republicans have to Cheat to Win

Post by _Water Dog »

The Texas Democratic Party asked non-citizens to register to vote, sending out applications to immigrants with the box citizenship already checked “Yes,” according to new complaints filed Thursday asking prosecutors to see what laws may have been broken.


https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... ster-vote/
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Republicans have to Cheat to Win

Post by _moksha »


Rather than quoting a publication of Reverend Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church, why don't you try the Christian Science Monitor or at least the Deseret News?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Water Dog
_Emeritus
Posts: 1798
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:10 am

Re: Republicans have to Cheat to Win

Post by _Water Dog »

More cheating from people who aren't Republican.

The Associated Press ran a story on October 9 about "pending voters" claiming that 53,000 voters have been placed on a "pending voter" file in Georgia because of a law called "exact match." That law requires voters to exactly match their drivers license on their voter registration information.

The Associated Press interviewed one such voter on the pending voter file named Marsha Appling-Nunez. The Associated Press claimed the lady was a "pending voter" because of the hyphen in her name.

Georgia's Secretary of State came on the radio with me this afternoon to review his office's findings. It turns out Marsha Appling-Nunez is an active voter, not a pending voter. Ms Appling-Nunez's "pending voter" designation applies to her new registration. She is a pre-existing active voter and can vote on November 6th.


There are not 53,000 pending voters. There are just over 75,000 voters. Here's how they break down.

9,224 are ‘pending’ because the person is 17.5

2,935 used a fake address

3,393 are ‘pending’ because citizenship could not be verified

5,842 are ‘pending’ because they match another active voter file

After you remove underage, fake addresses, duplicates, and non-citizens, you have roughly 46,000 ‘pending’ on the list.

75% are on the list because they failed Social Security Number verification, a process put in place under the Obama Administration.


Now, here's the kicker. 23% of these were submitted by the New Georgia Project, the non-profit set up by Stacey Abrams. Those 23% have been pending since 2014, which means 11,024 pending voters have never shown up at a Board of Elections office anywhere in Georgia or at a voting precinct. Also, 1,323 or3% match a recently cancelled voter registration record, meaning the voter died, was convicted or pled guilty to committing a felony, or turned out to be a non-citizen.

In other words, 75% of the voters didn't put down an accurate social security number and 23% came from a registration drive conducted by Stacey Abrams in 2014 and none of those voters have ever followed up to fix the paperwork.


https://www.themaven.net/theresurgent/e ... txlCkXgFQ/
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Republicans have to Cheat to Win

Post by _Kevin Graham »

More BS from another uneducated talk radio idiot.

Water Dog really doesn't go all out on stupid.
_Water Dog
_Emeritus
Posts: 1798
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:10 am

Re: Republicans have to Cheat to Win

Post by _Water Dog »

Kevin Graham wrote:More BS from another uneducated talk radio idiot.

Water Dog really doesn't go all out on stupid.

It's reported from the GA SOS, but, sure, okay. LOL.
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Republicans have to Cheat to Win

Post by _Kevin Graham »

Water Dog wrote:
Kevin Graham wrote:More ____ from another uneducated talk radio idiot.

Water Dog really doesn't go all out on stupid.

It's reported from the GA SOS, but, sure, okay. LOL.


No, your rant from Ericksson is based off of what Kemp told him on radio. You know, the same guy who started this. The same guy who was just caught on audio saying he's worried about minorities voting. The same guy who had to settle a lawsuit 18 months ago for disenfranchising minority votes.

You and "Erik" take his word as fact because he's a republican.
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Republicans have to Cheat to Win

Post by _EAllusion »

A project Veritas plant has been rooted out of a Democratic campaign again:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/james-oke ... /main-info
_Water Dog
_Emeritus
Posts: 1798
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:10 am

Re: Republicans have to Cheat to Win

Post by _Water Dog »

More Democrats cheating... follow the thread, it's pretty reprehensible. If this were happening in a red district media would be camped outside demanding answers. One has to wonder what the hell is going on. How are they this bad at cheating? Seriously how long does it take to stuff fake votes into a box? Are they searching for dead people? Registered people that didn't show? Are they coming up with which R votes to shred? Weird.

Image

https://Twitter.com/marcorubio/status/1 ... 4577657856
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Republicans have to Cheat to Win

Post by _Chap »

As aussieguy has remarked, it does seem a bit strange to find that in the US people are content to have the proper conduct of elections overseen not by any impartial national body - a kind of electoral FDA, perhaps? - but apparently in many cases by the politicians whose jobs depend on their getting elected through the processes they are charged to oversee.

Am I wrong about that? (I'd be glad to be told that I was). Is that the way it is in every state? If so, why are people apparently content to let things stay that way?
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Post Reply