Ah, now this is a textbook example of grasping the point, of actual understanding for you Binger. K.Graham didn't even have to spend 10 seconds on it to come to a simple almost kindergarten level understanding which, obviously, from your post Binger, entirely escaped you. My suggestion, sincerely, is that you pay more attention to what K.Graham says since he is rather spot on and quite coherent (sorry for the big words which the rest of us grasp, again I offer my services to you Binger of looking up the words in a dictionary and reading out their meanings to you if that would help).
Start with what? A BS thread that the racist K Graham started and where he asked specific posters to explain and then panny chopped the comments and moved them to prison? Start with that? Panny took EVERY comment out of the conversation and moved it to prison, except the crappy OP, which he left in place. Then, the thread ramped up again, and panny chopped it up. Finally, moderators had to go edit the OP.
Is this the logic or information gathering process that Philo is advocating? If so, I accept the conditions. It seems that the confrontation of the OP referenced is cool cool cool for the moderators, and uncool uncool uncool if anyone does not agree with the OP insults and allegations. I accept the conditions, which are, free speech for some and if panny dislikes what you do with an insult, he will decide to move it to prison.
Thank you! I'm just happy to see others also countering the nonsense about moderation that binger is shoveling at shades. He really has a skewed view of the world around him. (or he doesn't and he is consciously doing what sociopathic trolls do all over the internet--revel in attempting to destroy communities and disrupt communications. who knows. )
Philo, you sure you want this alliance? Think hard here. Pay attention.
I try to ally with truth and rationality, all else is subject to ignoring or refuting....
Start with what? A BS thread that the racist K Graham started and where he asked specific posters to explain and then panny chopped the comments and moved them to prison? Start with that? Panny took EVERY comment out of the conversation and moved it to prison, except the crappy OP, which he left in place. Then, the thread ramped up again, and panny chopped it up. Finally, moderators had to go edit the OP.
Translation:
"I, Binger, decided that I didn't like someone else's thread, and purposefully derailed it. When the derail was moved, I tried to derail it again. When the second derail was moved, I threw a fit".
Start with what? A B.S. thread that the racist K Graham started and where he asked specific posters to explain and then panny chopped the comments and moved them to prison? Start with that? Panny took EVERY comment out of the conversation and moved it to prison, except the crappy OP, which he left in place. Then, the thread ramped up again, and panny chopped it up. Finally, moderators had to go edit the OP.
Is this the logic or information gathering process that Philo is advocating? If so, I accept the conditions. It seems that the confrontation of the OP referenced is cool cool cool for the moderators, and uncool uncool uncool if anyone does not agree with the OP insults and allegations. I accept the conditions, which are, free speech for some and if panny dislikes what you do with an insult, he will decide to move it to prison.
Am I doing this right?
Sigh. No, you're not. I am torn between thinking you know this and are continuing this god-awful incessant trolling to try to satisfy some pathological nastiness deep down in the darkest recesses of your miserable, writhing soul; or, you are just. that. Stupid.
Start with what? A B.S. thread that the racist K Graham started and where he asked specific posters to explain and then panny chopped the comments and moved them to prison? Start with that? Panny took EVERY comment out of the conversation and moved it to prison, except the crappy OP, which he left in place. Then, the thread ramped up again, and panny chopped it up. Finally, moderators had to go edit the OP.
Is this the logic or information gathering process that Philo is advocating? If so, I accept the conditions. It seems that the confrontation of the OP referenced is cool cool cool for the moderators, and uncool uncool uncool if anyone does not agree with the OP insults and allegations. I accept the conditions, which are, free speech for some and if panny dislikes what you do with an insult, he will decide to move it to prison.
Am I doing this right?
Sigh. No, you're not. I am torn between thinking you know this and are continuing this god-awful incessant trolling to try to satisfy some pathological nastiness deep down in the darkest recesses of your miserable, writhing soul; or, you are just. that. Stupid.
It's a rock and a hard place.
What makes you feel better, Marcus? Thinking I am stupid, or thinking that I am a troll? I suggest you stay the course, and choose based solely on your feelings.
Sigh. No, you're not. I am torn between thinking you know this and are continuing this god-awful incessant trolling to try to satisfy some pathological nastiness deep down in the darkest recesses of your miserable, writhing soul; or, you are just. that. Stupid.
It's a rock and a hard place.
What makes you feel better, Marcus? Thinking I am stupid, or thinking that I am a troll? I suggest you stay the course, and choose based solely on your feelings.
You are an incorrigible child who never grew out of their tantrum phase. No one has 'feelings' about that, they just try to step around the inevitable nonsense as they continue their day.
Here's a place to start:
Philo Sofee wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 4:35 pm
A most excellent point dear Doc...