It’s all there on that page.
Do you believe that widespread use of narrow and targeted voter fraud occurred in this election?
It’s all there on that page.
Res Ipsa wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 8:18 pmI hadn’t bothered to read Trump’s motion for expedited review that he filed along with his cert petition, so I missed his threat of disruption if he doesn’t get his way. https://electionlawblog.org/?p=119802
I’m not sure how stupid he thinks the Justices are. I guarantee that they all understand that Trump is the source of the threatened disruption. The concept of not negotiating with terrorists comes to mind.
Put directly, subbie should clarify if he believes there was a conspiracy to commit voter fraud that resulted in ten or hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes being cast for Biden in swing states. Meaning, he believes fraud occured that was planned and carried out at the scale required to swing the Presidential election targeting the handful of states Trump won in 2016 but lost in 2020.
Agreed.honorentheos wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 8:49 pmPut directly, subbie should clarify if he believes there was a conspiracy to commit voter fraud that resulted in ten or hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes being cast for Biden in swing states. Meaning, he believes fraud occured that was planned and carried out at the scale required to swing the Presidential election targeting the handful of states Trump won in 2016 but lost in 2020.
We should all agree some fraud occurs every election. It can include the widow who filled out and mailed in her deceased husband's ballot in the way she believed he would have filled it out. Or the person who returned a mail in ballot in one state where they used to live. Or a person attempting to vote who doesn't have the right to vote. Or...
But what we shouldn't believe happened given the evidence is that there was a coordinated large scale fraud that caused Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia or Pennsylvania to go Blue in 2020. If subbie believes that, he should own it and then provide actual evidence for it rather than innuendo claiming it.
If he disagrees with your accurate assessment, he'll need to explain how everything from zeroes in birthdate fields, to a heavy increase in Biden ballots during a specific time frame across multiple states, to a guy spotting similar handwriting for write-ins was all part of the same concerted "narrow and targeted" fraud.At this point, were subs to re-engage, he’d probably take issue with my use of the word, ‘widespread’. I cheekily included it on my response to him based on that being my original question to ajax that subs jumped in on with his claim that the fraud was ‘narrow and targeted’.
cool story, but your dishonesty is showing again...or maybe you're getting senile?
and my question above still remains...Not widespread, but rather narrow and targeted
That’s your comment, when you interjected between ajax and I. But that’s not my question. Also, read my last post before this.
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 1:54 amhttps://www.mediaite.com/election-2020/ ... e-reality/
Even Pat Robertson is telling the orange shitgibbon to move on.
- Doc