Rules and Moderator information

[Hound of Heaven]

I think we’ve exchanged one PM each. I am happy to screenshot and display the exchange here

What a sly little idiot you are! I asked you two or three times over the past month if I could share our conversation, and you clearly said no!!

Now that I've deleted our conversation, you want to share it? That's amusing! It seems you revised your original response to me, which is likely why you are now suggesting to post it instead of agreeing to let me post it a month prior. As I mentioned, your reliability as a moderator is questionable due to your bias and commitment to your cult ideology.

Why was I not permitted to share the conversation when I had the original unedited PM you sent me? I have asked you at least twice!

[canpakes]

for what it's worth, and nobody asked. I don't have an issue with how you moderate. I have an issue that you moderate. And yes, this post is about you in the proper thread.

OK, then. Run with that. Ask Shades to boot me from the mod team.

[canpakes]

I think we’ve exchanged one PM each. I am happy to screenshot and display the exchange here

What a sly little idiot you are! I asked you two or three times over the past month if I could share our conversation, and you clearly said no!!

Now that I've deleted our conversation, you want to share it? That's amusing! It seems you revised your original response to me, which is likely why you are now suggesting to post it instead of agreeing to let me post it a month prior. As I mentioned, your reliability as a moderator is questionable due to your bias and commitment to your cult ideology.

Why was I not permitted to share the conversation when I had the original unedited PM you sent me? I have asked you at least twice!

lol. I don’t believe that you deleted anything. And the exchange has never been edited by me.

Besides, no worries. I still feel the same about posting PMs. I’m not a fan of it and wouldn’t without Shades giving the OK. But, as you’ve made an accusation about the nature of our exchange - and in fairness to your claim - I’m OK with posting a screenshot of that exchange, if you’re ready to do so, and if Shades agrees.

[Whiskey]

for what it's worth, and nobody asked. I don't have an issue with how you moderate. I have an issue that you moderate. And yes, this post is about you in the proper thread.

OK, then. Run with that. Ask Shades to boot me from the mod team.

Nah. You’re not that interesting. I just liked the old mod style where the moderator was not also a trolling nuisance shitbird.

I mean. Shitbirds are fine. Moderators are fine. Moderating shitbirds are nonsense.

[canpakes]

OK, then. Run with that. Ask Shades to boot me from the mod team.

Nah. You’re not that interesting. I just liked the old mod style where the moderator was not also a trolling nuisance shitbird.

I mean. Shitbirds are fine. Moderators are fine. Moderating shitbirds are nonsense.

OK, then. Run with that. I’m not that interesting. I will expect that you’ll not find it worth your time to respond to my posts, and I’m good with that.

Have a great week. : )

[Whiskey]

Nah. You’re not that interesting. I just liked the old mod style where the moderator was not also a trolling nuisance shitbird.

I mean. Shitbirds are fine. Moderators are fine. Moderating shitbirds are nonsense.

OK, then. Run with that. I’m not that interesting. I will expect that you’ll not find it worth your time to respond to my posts, and I’m good with that.

Have a great week. : )

I like that proposal. And you can respond to my posts without making your post about me. Well. you're invited to do that, but you aren't capable of doing so.

[canpakes]

OK, then. Run with that. I’m not that interesting. I will expect that you’ll not find it worth your time to respond to my posts, and I’m good with that.

Have a great week. : )

I like that proposal. And you can respond to my posts without making your post about me. Well. you're invited to do that, but you aren't capable of doing so.

I can’t control the need of others to believe that any posts I make are all about them.

[Hound of Heaven]

What a sly little idiot you are! I asked you two or three times over the past month if I could share our conversation, and you clearly said no!!

Now that I've deleted our conversation, you want to share it? That's amusing! It seems you revised your original response to me, which is likely why you are now suggesting to post it instead of agreeing to let me post it a month prior. As I mentioned, your reliability as a moderator is questionable due to your bias and commitment to your cult ideology.

Why was I not permitted to share the conversation when I had the original unedited PM you sent me? I have asked you at least twice!

lol. I don’t believe that you deleted anything. And the exchange has never been edited by me.

Besides, no worries. I still feel the same about posting PMs. I’m not a fan of it and wouldn’t without Shades giving the OK. But, as you’ve made an accusation about the nature of our exchange - and in fairness to your claim - I’m OK with posting a screenshot of that exchange, if you’re ready to do so, and if Shades agrees.

Allow me to clarify the reasoning behind your insistence on sharing your PM response from over a month ago, so that everyone can grasp your manipulative thought process. A month ago, I inquired with you two or three times if I could share our private message exchanges, and you declined each time! Now that I no longer have those exchanges, you want to share a revised version of the PM you sent me. It seems you've taken the time to refine your condescending and narcissistic language because you're still bothered by the embarrassment from a month ago.

What is the reason for wanting to post our private messages now instead of a month ago? I'll tell you, it's because you altered the wording in the message to enhance your own image. That's why you're begging me to let you share it!! You put in a lot of effort revising your PM, and you want everyone to appreciate your craftsmanship! You truly come across as a rather unfortunate individual.

Why not a month ago, Can'tpakes??

[canpakes]

lol. I don’t believe that you deleted anything. And the exchange has never been edited by me.

Besides, no worries. I still feel the same about posting PMs. I’m not a fan of it and wouldn’t without Shades giving the OK. But, as you’ve made an accusation about the nature of our exchange - and in fairness to your claim - I’m OK with posting a screenshot of that exchange, if you’re ready to do so, and if Shades agrees.

Allow me to clarify the reasoning behind your insistence on sharing your PM response from over a month ago, so that everyone can grasp your manipulative thought process. A month ago, I inquired with you two or three times if I could share our private message exchanges, and you declined each time! Now that I no longer have those exchanges, you want to share a revised version of the PM you sent me. It seems you've taken the time to refine your condescending and narcissistic language because you're still bothered by the embarrassment from a month ago.

What is the reason for wanting to post our private messages now instead of a month ago? I'll tell you, it's because you altered the wording in the message to enhance your own image. That's why you're begging me to let you share it!! You put in a lot of effort revising your PM, and you want everyone to appreciate your craftsmanship! You truly come across as a rather unfortunate individual.

Why not a month ago, Can'tpakes??

Here’s your original request:

viewtopic.php?p=2907850#p2907850

Shades has a copy of the PMs. There have been no ‘edits’. I have some talents but reversing time isn’t one of them. : D

[Hound of Heaven]

Allow me to clarify the reasoning behind your insistence on sharing your PM response from over a month ago, so that everyone can grasp your manipulative thought process. A month ago, I inquired with you two or three times if I could share our private message exchanges, and you declined each time! Now that I no longer have those exchanges, you want to share a revised version of the PM you sent me. It seems you've taken the time to refine your condescending and narcissistic language because you're still bothered by the embarrassment from a month ago.

What is the reason for wanting to post our private messages now instead of a month ago? I'll tell you, it's because you altered the wording in the message to enhance your own image. That's why you're begging me to let you share it!! You put in a lot of effort revising your PM, and you want everyone to appreciate your craftsmanship! You truly come across as a rather unfortunate individual.

Why not a month ago, Can'tpakes??

Here’s your original request:

viewtopic.php?p=2907850#p2907850

Shades has a copy of the PMs. There have been no ‘edits’. I have some talents but reversing time isn’t one of them. : D

Regarding the posting of our PMs, xxxk you! You had your opportunity when I inquired three times about a month ago, and now you wish to release them when I don't possess a copy!

Indeed, I won't be deceived by your schemes! However, I will share what I recall. I recall what you mentioned regarding my use of a PM to reach out to you. Initially, your reply came across as quite condescending, and it felt as though you did not regard me as an equal. It seemed you were addressing me in a manner more suited to a child, implying that I would only receive a serious response if I crafted a question that met your standards in tone, substance, and overall meaning. Meaning, you're a narcissist!! Otherwise, it appeared that a serious reply would be withheld.

Your attempt was to establish a parent-child dynamic, positioning yourself as the parent and me as the child. It's a classic display of power rooted in conditional respect! Your tone came across as patronizing and domineering, and it seems you are trying to establish your role as a moderator by evaluating my value before deciding to engage. Your behavior and statements on this board, particularly in your role as moderator, seem self-centered, as you consistently create situations that allow you to shift blame if things go wrong.

It's perpetually the responsibility of others, never your own. Classic narcissism!

Did you not say something close to this, "that your response back to me will be given at the level of seriousness that my PMs are written" Or something to that affect? Meaning, what you're trying to convey is that you'll treat my PMs seriously if I earn it! Do you understand how narcissistic that type of thinking is?