The DoubtingThomas dating / relationships MEGATHREAD

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_DoubtingThomas
_Emeritus
Posts: 4551
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:04 am

Re: 45% of women and it is hard not to care

Post by _DoubtingThomas »

I have a question wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 12:13 pm
You seem to have neglected to post a reference to the data or report from which you've pulled that assertion. Please can you cite your data?
According to the study 10% of 16 year old girls had a relationship with someone "at least three years" older. The study is really disturbing, but it makes me assume that many 17 year olds date guys over 20, it is obvious.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18318868

Another study.
16-17 year old women, "29% a partner who was 3-5 years older, and 7% a partner who was six or more years older."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10435214
Last edited by Guest on Tue May 05, 2020 4:16 am, edited 2 times in total.
_DoubtingThomas
_Emeritus
Posts: 4551
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:04 am

Re: 45% of women and it is hard not to care

Post by _DoubtingThomas »

It is common with Hispanic communities in the US according to the same study.
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: 45% of women and it is hard not to care

Post by _Lemmie »

I have a question wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 12:13 pm
DoubtingThomas wrote:
Sun May 03, 2020 11:08 pm
Many men in their early 20s do date 16-17 year olds, it is more common than you think, especially with minorities and Mexicans.
You seem to have neglected to post a reference to the data or report from which you've pulled that assertion. Please can you cite your data?
DT wrote: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18318868

According to the study 10% of 16 year old girls had a relationship with someone "at least three years" older.
That doesn’t support your statement that ihaq was asking about.
The study is really disturbing, but it makes me assume that many 17 year olds date guys over 20, it is obvious.
It is NOT obvious, and there is literally NO REASON to assume that, other than your sexist assumptions about women. It is creepy, but as expected, because that’s your go-to strategy when you troll this topic of dating girls too young for you.
It is common with Hispanic communities in the US according to the same study.
The study does not say that.
_DoubtingThomas
_Emeritus
Posts: 4551
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:04 am

Re: 45% of women and it is hard not to care

Post by _DoubtingThomas »

Lemmie wrote:
Tue May 05, 2020 3:15 am
The study does not say that.
Yes it does. You have to read the study.
Lemmie wrote:
Tue May 05, 2020 3:15 am
NO REASON to assume that, other than your sexist assumptions about women.

Psychologists are not sexists.

"study of 4,764 men and 5,389 women in 33 countries and 37 cultures showed that sex differences in mate preferences are much larger than previously appreciated and stable across cultures. "Many want to believe that women and men are identical in their underlying psychology, but the genders differ strikingly in their evolved mate preferences in some domains," said co-author of the study and psychology professor David Buss...Researchers found that they could predict a person's sex with 92.2 percent accuracy if they knew his or her mate preferences... According to the study, men favor mates who are younger and physically attractive. Women seek older mates with good financial prospects, higher status and ambition."
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 122002.htm
Lemmie wrote:
Tue May 05, 2020 3:15 am

That doesn’t support your statement that ihaq was asking about..
What is ihaq asking?
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: 45% of women and it is hard not to care

Post by _Lemmie »

DoubtingThomas wrote:
Tue May 05, 2020 3:22 am
It is common with Hispanic communities in the US according to the same study.
Lemmie wrote:
Tue May 05, 2020 3:15 am
The study does not say that.
Yes it does. You have to read the study.
I did. No it doesn’t.
Lemmie wrote:
Tue May 05, 2020 3:15 am
NO REASON to assume that, other than your sexist assumptions about women.
DT wrote: Psychologists are not sexists...<irrelevant trolling snipped>
YOU are sexist.
Lemmie wrote:
Tue May 05, 2020 3:15 am

That doesn’t support your statement that ihaq was asking about.
DT wrote: What is ihaq asking?
I posted Ihaq’s question, which you conveniently left out. The only conclusion is that you are just trolling. Again.
Do you really enjoy knowing that people see you as a creepy, sexist troll?
_DoubtingThomas
_Emeritus
Posts: 4551
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:04 am

Re: 45% of women and it is hard not to care

Post by _DoubtingThomas »

I have a question wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 12:13 pm
You seem to have neglected to post a reference to the data or report from which you've pulled that assertion. Please can you cite your data?
Lemmie wrote:
Tue May 05, 2020 3:15 am
literally NO REASON to assume that
Another study

17 year old women, "29% a partner who was 3-5 years older, and 7% a partner who was six or more years older."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10435214

A lot of 17 year old girls are dating 20 year old guys, but I will never date a 17 year old girl. I am only interested in 18 years or older.
Lemmie wrote:
Tue May 05, 2020 3:54 am
I did. No it doesn’t.
It does say.

You are the creepy sexist troll. Why are you so sexist? Why do you hate men? Why are you trolling?
Last edited by Guest on Tue May 05, 2020 5:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
_DoubtingThomas
_Emeritus
Posts: 4551
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:04 am

Re: 45% of women and it is hard not to care

Post by _DoubtingThomas »

Seriously, when are you going to stop trolling?
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: 45% of women and it is hard not to care

Post by _Lemmie »

DoubtingThomas wrote:
Tue May 05, 2020 4:07 am
I have a question wrote:
Mon May 04, 2020 12:13 pm
You seem to have neglected to post a reference to the data or report from which you've pulled that assertion. Please can you cite your data?
Lemmie wrote:
Tue May 05, 2020 3:15 am
literally NO REASON to assume that
Another study

17 year old women, "29% a partner who was 3-5 years older, and 7% a partner who was six or more years older."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10435214

A lot of 17 year old girls are dating 20 year old guys, but I will never date a 17 year old girl. I am only interested in 18 years or older.
Lemmie wrote:
Tue May 05, 2020 3:54 am
I did. No it doesn’t.
It does say.

You are the creepy sexist troll. Why are you so sexist? Why do you hate men? Why are you trolling?
Lol. Just going to quote this out of context nonsense so it remains when you decide once again, like you have so many, many times, to delete your “creepy sexist” “trolling.“
_DoubtingThomas
_Emeritus
Posts: 4551
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:04 am

Re: 45% of women and it is hard not to care

Post by _DoubtingThomas »

Lemmie wrote:
Tue May 05, 2020 4:39 am
Lol. Just going to quote this out of context nonsense so it remains when you decide once again, like you have so many, many times, to delete your “creepy sexist” “trolling.“
I am not quoting anything out of context. You are now lying. The link is right there. Even 5% is still be common.
17 year old women, "29% a partner who was 3-5 years older, and 7% a partner who was six or more years older"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10435214

A lot of 17 year old girls are dating 20 year old guys, but I will never date a 17 year old girl. I am only interested in 18 years or older.

Your name calling distracts others from what I am actually saying. The problem is your name calling, you don't want others to listen and carefully read my words. It is your psychological trick and manipulation.

You are a manipulator and you are lying.
Last edited by Guest on Tue May 05, 2020 5:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
_DoubtingThomas
_Emeritus
Posts: 4551
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:04 am

Re: 45% of women and it is hard not to care

Post by _DoubtingThomas »

Lemmie plays dirty politics so people won't carefully read. I did not quote anything out of context. Perhaps Lemmie only read the first sentence and assumed I was quoting out of context.
Post Reply