Boaz & Lidia wrote:I don't understand how folks enjoy playing and futzing with their mutt box windows machines, patching, rebooting, virus scanning, reinstalling, rebooting, repairing, updating, etc.. I enjoy simply using my computers. I turn them on, use them for their intended purpose and turn them off. Simple.
Because I demand high performance from my machine, which is something that Apple Mac has never been able to provide. When Mac releases a system that can handle dual GeForce 9800GX2, 8GB of DDR3, and an Intel QX9770 overclocked to 4ghz that's able to play the latest FPS games at maximum visual setting, I'll consider buying one. That futzing with a "muttbox" means that when the bleeding edge of PC technology moves, I can move with it and I don't have to buy an entirely new computer to do it. When game manufacturers push their products fathers I can keep up, and even better, I don't have to wait months or even years before someone gets around to making a version that's compatible with my OS.
If all you're doing is checking your email and putzing around on the internet, then Mac's perfect you. If you actually need to do anything requiring some actual computing muscle then you need a PC (or you just go talk to Sun Microsystems about one of their monsters). Macs are computers for people either to lazy, to inept, or simply not interested enough to actually need a high power system.
Boaz & Lidia wrote:By using Apple products, I save more time than if I used other cheaper products.
Wait a second... First you say time is money and go about how much your Mac saves you and then you say Mac are more expensive? Care to back that up? Because I typing this from a Alienware Area 51ALX and I can guarantee you that it's both more powerful then anything Mac makes and probably costs as much or more than their flagship system fully loaded.
Boaz & Lidia wrote:I waste zero time with problems so common to Windows.
What problem? I've been running Vista for quite sometime now and I've not had any issues at all. In fact, Vista is probably the most stable OS Microsoft has released since Windows New Testament 5.
Boaz & Lidia wrote:My iPhone does everything as if it were a mere extension of my mental processes.
Yeah, yeah... Time is money, blah blah blah. Which is precisely why you waited for an Apple product using an AT&T network to be released that has the same capabilities that were available with other manufactures and providers had years ago? Just admit it, you like apple products because they look shiny.
Boaz & Lidia wrote:Yes Apple products cost more, just like the finer things in life. If you can afford them, why not?
Yeah, go compare the price of the 3G iPhone to the Nokia N95 8GB and then come and tell me which is more expensive.
Here's Mac's flagship desktop system. And here's
mine. Just base model vs base model, my system is twice the cost, but also three times the capability. The only areas that the Mac Pro can exceeded my system in is it can have it's memory expanded out to 32GB (to bad you losers are still stuck with DDR2...worse, you're going to have to spend almost 10k to do it, for that much I could build a better system then a fully loaded Mac Pro), and it can mount to processors (To bad you losers are stuck with Xeons... I'll have the new Nahelem chip in my system in another three months). Can the Mac Pro play game? Not really... You can expand the hard drive space out to 4TB... I can do that and then expand it out to 16TB just by adding a card to one of the many spare ati slots I've got...
So you were saying something about Macs being worth anything to a serious user?