So what was Kevin G. saying...

[_EAllusion]

about education levels and voting patterns again? Do go on.

[_Moniker]

Ha!

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1

[_Some Schmo]

Hehehe

[_Analytics]

Ha!

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1

McCain sure did well with whites without college.

[_Some Schmo]

Ha!

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1

McCain sure did well with whites without college.

And did you happen to notice how well Obama did with post graduates?

[_Moniker]

What I find interesting is that Obama led in every category in education. He appealed to those with no high school diplomas as well as those with post graduate work.

[_Moniker]

Oh, and 4% of the Presidential votes were cast by those with no highschool diploma. 75% of the votes were cast by individuals with some college or higher and Obama led in each of those categories as well as having a significant lead in post-graduate (like Schmo stated).

[_bcspace]

McCain sure did well with whites without college.

With revisionist history being taught in college, as well as even college grads forgetting the lessons of history (were they ever even taught?) is anyone suprised?

[_Gadianton]

Well, I for one didn't forget about the "No true Scotsman" fallacy. But for those who had, thanks for the refresher course, BC.

[_Angus McAwesome]

BC, so you're saying that graduates have forgotten history and/or are taught "revisionist" history? Ok, I'll bit. Someone else, say Dr. Shades or whoever, picks the topic and you and I debate the history of it. Because I think you're full of crap, and unlike you, I'm willing to prove you're full of crap.