Page 1 of 2

So what was Kevin G. saying...

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:31 pm
by _EAllusion
about education levels and voting patterns again? Do go on.

Re: So what was Kevin G. saying...

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 2:54 pm
by _Moniker

Re: So what was Kevin G. saying...

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:51 pm
by _Some Schmo
Hehehe

Re: So what was Kevin G. saying...

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:56 pm
by _Analytics

McCain sure did well with whites without college.

Re: So what was Kevin G. saying...

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:46 pm
by _Some Schmo
Analytics wrote:

McCain sure did well with whites without college.

And did you happen to notice how well Obama did with post graduates?

Re: So what was Kevin G. saying...

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:02 pm
by _Moniker
What I find interesting is that Obama led in every category in education. He appealed to those with no high school diplomas as well as those with post graduate work.

Re: So what was Kevin G. saying...

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:09 pm
by _Moniker
Oh, and 4% of the Presidential votes were cast by those with no highschool diploma. 75% of the votes were cast by individuals with some college or higher and Obama led in each of those categories as well as having a significant lead in post-graduate (like Schmo stated).

Re: So what was Kevin G. saying...

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:46 pm
by _bcspace
McCain sure did well with whites without college.


With revisionist history being taught in college, as well as even college grads forgetting the lessons of history (were they ever even taught?) is anyone suprised?

Re: So what was Kevin G. saying...

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 2:53 am
by _Gadianton
Well, I for one didn't forget about the "No true Scotsman" fallacy. But for those who had, thanks for the refresher course, BC.

Re: So what was Kevin G. saying...

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:35 pm
by _Angus McAwesome
BC, so you're saying that graduates have forgotten history and/or are taught "revisionist" history? Ok, I'll bit. Someone else, say Dr. Shades or whoever, picks the topic and you and I debate the history of it. Because I think you're full of crap, and unlike you, I'm willing to prove you're full of crap.