Meadowchick wrote:I had a Trumper tell me that we should be concerned about the "statistical anomalies" of the election.
There have been several examples cited, and what they all have in common is the failure to make any sort of logical sense in a fraud scenario, let alone is there actual evidence linking them to fraud.
Let me give you an analogy. Suppose you are a drug lord and have 250 million in cash that you need to launder, and you hire an Ozark's level guy to churn that money for you. The whole point is to sneak in a little money here and there and hope that no "statistical anomalies" show up that tip off auditors.
Now suppose you are a drug lord, and you hire a Ozark's level guy to launder $11,780. What are the odds he can pull it off without leaving a trail?
Suppose that you either a) already have the means to evade the system and create thousands or tens of thousands of fake ballots or b) you have malicious software embedded within the Dominion voting machine.
If you're already smart enough and capable enough to pull off all of that, don't you think you can execute the fraud in such a way that it doesn't leave a trail of cookie crumbs? We're doing the fraud in swing states where it's going to be very close, and so we don't need a whole lot of fabrication. I'm sure that a decent A.I. coder could rig Dominion to keep track of Trump and Biden votes, and sneak in one or two more for Biden every time it processes a clump (in the already unrealistic world that Ajax and subs live in, that is), and not suddenly add in a huge and suspicious number at one point in time!
The same for ballots. After you've filled your garage with fake Biden ballots, why would you put them all in 5 vans that drive out to 5 states to unload their cargo during the same hours to produce a "statistical anomaly" between the hours of 2 and 6 AM (or something like that) when you could have been mailing them in small clumps from various locations for months?
One of the examples subs gave, that he was 100% sure constituted fraud was this: This year in some state for online voting registration, several thousand voters were registered with null birthday dates, which was 10 or 20 times more than in previous years. Hello? Fraud? Well, apply the principle above to this scenario. If you can register fake voters and evade checks for social security numbers and things like that, why wouldn't you just make up random birthdays, rather than make it suspicious by putting in null dates?
But as it happens, as I've worked in IT for financial companies; what you're looking at is a software defect. Obviously, the software platform this year had a bug that allowed users to register without forcing them to input their birthday date before they submitted. After a few days, somebody notices and then it gets fixed, but it will affect a bunch of people until then.