I am starting a fresh thread. You wrote...
honorentheos wrote:Markk, wanna make a bet? If the Ukraine investigation into Biden turns up nothing more than Burisma hired Hunter Biden for typical reasons corps hire connected people to be on their boards but no actual monetary benefits.or overturned investigations resulted from it you need to get your nipple pierced and post a photo here. If Biden is formally charged with a crime by the Ukraine and they seek redress from the US I guess I'm up for a new bit of jewelry.
That said, you may want to learn a bit more about why the court in Ukraine agreed to investigate. You could start here:
https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politi ... reloaded=1
I have read the whys Honor, when I first heard of this the other day. I have read Shokin's official (signed) complaint, have you?
What it shows is that there are two sides to the argument, as I have been stating . This lends to my position that there is enough evidence to warrant a investigation.
You will have to focus, my point is and has always been, which compliments the impeachment trial out come, " is whether or not there is enough evidence to warrant an investigation." I have asked that question here countless times. I have backed the question up with reason, yet it is ducked most every time.
Here is the complaint...
https://www.les-crises.fr/breaking-news ... oceedings/
Here is The full Shokin interview (see #4), along with a video series that show a different side of the story... which is 180 to the picture you are trying to portray (without any real back up).
Start with the short versions. I have watched them all to date, and are working on the long versions as time allows.
https://ukrainegate.information/
Please note, Shokin's prosecution record, in Summary part 1, at approximately 35 seconds. This, if true, contradicts the assertions that Shokin was a lazy prosecutor.
Also, note who Biden is hugging in the video picture? See summary video #3.
Take your time and listen to the videos.
Thanks