Warren drops out

[Guest]

Add: To only consider women for VP.

[_Lemmie]

What are you doing, DT? The last time you posted that, I pointed out that none of your statements in quotes came from those links, so what’s your point in reposting my earlier comment? Here’s how I responded last time:

Can you provide a source link for the statements you put in quotes? The link you attached is just a spreadsheet of statistics.

11. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity [Numbers in thousands]
Women
Management, professional, and related occupations 51.8
https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm

"Childless Women In Their Twenties Out-Earn Men. So?"
"Women in their 20s without children out-earn men by as much as $1.08 to every dollar, according to some estimates."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2 ... 6e2c77a82c

"Among what was released in September 2010 was this: The median full-time salaries of young women in America’s metropolitan areas are 8 percent higher than those of the guys in their peer group."
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... ies-gop-p/

Come on. DT. You put this in quotes:

“Women in America have more opportunities than men, and according to the bls 51.8% "Management, professional, and related occupations" are held by women, and young women make more than young men"

None of the additional links you gave have that quotation in it. Where did you get that quotation? Was it a real quotation, or not? Or were you just quoting your own OPINION from page 1 of this thread?

If you’re going to re-quote yourself, don’t involve me.

[_EAllusion]

Biden probably wouldn't have promised that if he didn't already have a VP picked or a shortlist that already only includes women.

Hopefully not Harris, i.e. younger Joe Biden.

[Guest]

Biden probably wouldn't have promised that if he didn't already have a VP picked or a shortlist that already only includes women.

Did he clarify that?

I don't think it is a good political strategy for Biden to pick a woman for VP. Why? Because Biden doesn't have to go after female support, he will automatically get it. In November non-conservative women will vote against Trump no matter what. Now you agree that being a woman is a disadvantage in the General Election, so Biden at 77 has made a very risky decision to pick a woman. I do want a female president and a female VP, but it can wait. People always say "don't get desperate, the time will come".

Hopefully not Harris, i.e. younger Joe Biden.

Of course it will be her. There is hardly any difference between Harris and Biden. She is the younger Joe Biden.

[Guest]

Here’s how I responded last time:

You did no respond to.

"New Report Says Women Will Soon Be Majority Of College-Educated U.S. Workers"
https://www.npr.org/2019/06/20/73440857 ... -s-labor-f

"Young Women Widen the Higher Education Gap - Bloomberg"
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... cation-gap

"Women-only STEM college programs under attack for male discrimination"
https://www.latimes.com/california/stor ... complaints

And it is okay, my point is that we can afford to wait for a female president.

[_DoubtingThomas]

Hopefully not Harris, i.e. younger Joe Biden.

I would be very very happy if he were to pick someone like Tracy Harris, but that will never happen.

[_Lemmie]

Here’s how I responded last time:

You did no respond to....

Lol. Those are from the post you started with

It was just an opinion.

Don’t mis-use my posts in your quotes. Make your own points.

[_DoubtingThomas]

Never Mind.

[_DoubtingThomas]

Hopefully not Harris, i.e. younger Joe Biden.

She is the younger Joe Biden.

[_Lemmie]

Never Mind.

Good choice.