canpakes wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:52 pm
You should read your own links. ; )
I did, as (maybe) did you...but your comprehension is lacking.
There was no plan in place to reunite children with their parents after they had been separated, inspectors found.
read this line again...out loud.
First notice that you edited it from the original text -
"There was no plan in place to reunited children with their parents after they had been separated, inspectors found."
Which is a fine edit, but it is an unsubstantiated stand-alone statement in the cited article. While the "watchdog" is not identified, there is a link to the official report on the matter -
https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-Brian Laundrie-18-00510.pdf
Within which, the facts are presented.
... which confirms Chap’s original post.
Chap's claim was -
" there was no plan to track the families or even reunite them"
(1) The "track" claim has already been refuted by facts. There was a tracking system in place.
(2) The "reunite" claim is also refuted by the facts -
whereas we learn via the Memorandum of Agreement (1st one signed by Obama in Feb 2016) that DHS and HHS had no clear system for communication between them, ergo the systematic errors/confusion began with Obama and not Trump, ergo Chap's claim that it "Truuummmpppfff!" is refuted. Reference also page 8 and 9 of referenced "report" linked herein and from cited article.
We can clearly "read" from the report -
"In June 2018, HHS and DHS did not routinely collect and share the information necessary to identify, track, or connect families separated by
DHS. Compliance with the Ms. L v. ICE court order of June 26, 2018, therefore required both HHS and DHS to undertake a significant new effort to rapidly identify children in ORR care who had been separated from their parents and reunify them."
So - arguably there may not have been a "plan to reunite", but that lack was from the Obama administration and not specific to Trump. The issue being discovered by the consequences of the above mentioned ruling.
WHAT WE DO KNOW AS FACT IS THAT JULY 2018 WAS WHEN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ISSUED
Interagency Plan for Reunification Under Ms. L v. ICE - keyword = "PLAN". (see page 12).
Point being, Chap's claim (1) is refuted by fact; and claim (2) is refuted because Chap specifically states that the "reunite" issue was "propriety of the Trump administration's southern border policy" - when the facts show that it was Obama's policy with the shortcoming being from the Memorandum in Feb 2016.
I appreciate that you tried so hard to make it look as if you weren’t just babbling out of your arse, but you’re done here.
your arrogance is only exceeded by your ignorance on the matter, which lags behind your desperation....but, yeah done here indeed.
...
and here is the link again, in case you get tired of being spoon fed.