Page 1 of 1

Trump and Intelligence Briefings

Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2021 7:01 pm
by K Graham
Apparently it was just impossible to brief him on anything because it required listening, and Trump constantly interrupted with his derailing rants.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6RIFOcIq7E

Given this, why would anyone want a commander in chief who cannot have adult discussions with military officials? This alone should disqualify him. And the fact that military officials were preparing a contingency to thwart Trump's attempt at a coup.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVk0Fh_EGI8

Re: Trump and Intelligence Briefings

Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2021 7:14 pm
by Some Schmo
I've always said, I could excuse his policies and some of the lying, and even the fact that he's an incurable asshole, but he should never be President because he's damned incompetent.

Re: Trump and Intelligence Briefings

Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:50 pm
by Doctor CamNC4Me
K Graham wrote:
Wed Dec 01, 2021 7:01 pm
Apparently it was just impossible to brief him on anything because it required listening, and Trump constantly interrupted with his derailing rants.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6RIFOcIq7E

Given this, why would anyone want a commander in chief who cannot have adult discussions with military officials? This alone should disqualify him. And the fact that military officials were preparing a contingency to thwart Trump's attempt at a coup.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVk0Fh_EGI8
I can’t quite tell from the video clip, but did Mr. Priest disclose his sources that fed him this information? Here’s his lawfare podcast interview that might shed more light on the matter:

https://www.lawfareblog.com/lawfare-pod ... vid-priess

It’s 55 minutes, so I don’t feel like listening to it, but perhaps someone here will.

- Doc

Re: Trump and Intelligence Briefings

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:36 am
by Res Ipsa
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:50 pm
K Graham wrote:
Wed Dec 01, 2021 7:01 pm
Apparently it was just impossible to brief him on anything because it required listening, and Trump constantly interrupted with his derailing rants.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6RIFOcIq7E

Given this, why would anyone want a commander in chief who cannot have adult discussions with military officials? This alone should disqualify him. And the fact that military officials were preparing a contingency to thwart Trump's attempt at a coup.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVk0Fh_EGI8
I can’t quite tell from the video clip, but did Mr. Priest disclose his sources that fed him this information? Here’s his lawfare podcast interview that might shed more light on the matter:

https://www.lawfareblog.com/lawfare-pod ... vid-priess

It’s 55 minutes, so I don’t feel like listening to it, but perhaps someone here will.

- Doc
Fairly interesting, but nothing earth shattering. The spookiest part was that, for the last month his presidency, Trump was neither being briefed or reading the PDB.

Re: Trump and Intelligence Briefings

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:45 am
by canpakes
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:50 pm
I can’t quite tell from the video clip, but did Mr. Priest disclose his sources that fed him this information? Here’s his lawfare podcast interview that might shed more light on the matter:

https://www.lawfareblog.com/lawfare-pod ... vid-priess

It’s 55 minutes, so I don’t feel like listening to it, but perhaps someone here will.

- Doc
Doc, the likely document is linked to from within this site -

https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/books ... h-edition/

Re: Trump and Intelligence Briefings

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:47 am
by Res Ipsa
canpakes wrote:
Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:45 am
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:50 pm
I can’t quite tell from the video clip, but did Mr. Priest disclose his sources that fed him this information? Here’s his lawfare podcast interview that might shed more light on the matter:

https://www.lawfareblog.com/lawfare-pod ... vid-priess

It’s 55 minutes, so I don’t feel like listening to it, but perhaps someone here will.

- Doc
Doc, the likely document is linked to from within this site -

https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/books ... h-edition/
Yes, that’s the right source.