Is there a procedurally normal, non-conspiratorial reason for this ‘denial’, I wonder?ceeboo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2023 7:31 pmHunter Biden Prosecutor Claims He Was Not Allowed to Charge First Son Outside of Delaware and Was Denied Special Counsel Status by DOJ
Story by Connor Surmonte • Yesterday 6:30 PM
Radar Online
Hunter Biden Prosecutor Claims He Was Not Allowed to Charge First Son Outside of Delaware and Was Denied Special Counsel Status by DOJ
Federal prosecutor David C. Weiss allegedly told six witnesses that he did not have the authority to charge Hunter Biden outside of Delaware, RadarOnline.com has learned.
Why would that be needed? Serious question.Weiss also reportedly told the witnesses that he was denied special counsel status by the Department of Justice.
Hmm. Earth-shattering? Well, that sounds very dramatic.“He then shocked us with the earth-shattering news that the Biden-appointed D.C. U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves would not allow him to charge in his district,” Shapley continued.
Is earning ‘foreign income’ a chargeable offense? Asking in case my Serbian Essential Oils subsidiary takes off.Shapley also alleged to the House committee that Weiss was not allowed to charge Hunter for several suspected crimes committed in 2014 and 2015, including “foreign income from Burisma” …
Was the intent to charge him for scheming to evade taxes, or for evading taxes? When worded this way, isn’t this what most businesses strive to do via accountants and lawyers anyway?…and “a scheme to evade his income taxes through a partnership with a convicted felon.”
And is ‘a partnership with a convicted felon’ a crime in and of itself?
Gotta admit, I certainly appreciate the lengths that some sources will go to use language seemingly designed to force a particular conclusion from a particular audience.