When Fauci speaks, the thinking has been done.
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:12 pm
Trump has often been criticized as authoritarian and a threat to liberal media and 1st amendment rights. In post constitutional America, I couldn't think of a more clear violation of 1st amendment rights than what was pulled off during the global scamdemic government power grab. Unless the partisan party in power agrees with the conclusion your data supports at the time, your evidence must be suppressed and deplatformed and kept away from the American people lest this information influence their vote and the left's grip on power. Someone could decide to risk going to work rather than accumulating debt and die. Such decisions cannot belong to the individual in post constitutional America, but must be reserved those in the administrative state. Anyone who presents conflicting data is a murderer. No longer are issues permitted to be debated in public in front of voters. Voters must only be permitted to know what the Democrat party and the administrative deep state allows. Our first amendment rights have been usurped. Anyone who calls this election interference will lose their job, professional license, etc. Now if you are the appointed bureaucret in authority, you are allowed to evaluate and modify what information or advice you permit voters to know. This means you're practicing good science in changing policy depending on when you're willing to consider conflicting data. But only those in authority can consider data and make these decisions. Citizens can never be allowed to make these choices for themselves.
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2023/07 ... should-do/On Wednesday’s broadcast of “CNN This Morning,” guest co-host and CNN Chief White House Correspondent Phil Mattingly acknowledged that social media platforms would, “more often than not” give in to the regular demands by the Biden administration to censor content that they disagreed with on the coronavirus pandemic, and stated that the administration coordinating with tech companies to censor content “makes sense,” and is “probably what we should do on public health grounds.”
Mattingly said, “[T]he Biden administration would regularly reach out to Twitter and Facebook and other companies in kind of the early stages of their COVID response and say, this person is spreading lies about vaccines, this account is spreading misinformation that is inhibiting — not just our efforts, the administration’s efforts to address COVID — but also public health, do something about it. And often, I think more often than not, the companies would respond and say, okay. And there are emails that came out during the course of this case that that was something that I think — when it was explained to me at the time, I thought, alright, that makes sense, that’s probably what we should do on public health grounds.”