Hound has questions!

[Hound of Heaven]

One trend I've noticed among members of the Trump cult is that their broad defense of all the heinous crap they do is to call criticism of it "politically motivated." How often have independents been labeled "progressive" or "radical leftists" simply for pointing out what a useless person Trump is? Idiot terms like "TDS" and "woke" are applied to regular people who see a character like Trump and are disgusted, or witnessing his incompetence and having the audacity to point it out.

Being disgusted is the normal human reaction to an obvious piece of crap and every other context, but because Trump lives in the context of politics, these fruitcakes want to claim it's only about politics. Of course they do, because they don't want to own his crap, despite the fact that they're covered in it.

Hello Canpakes, is it against the rules to post pictures in Some Schmo's thread? I’m inquiring because I’m uncertain.

I believe the reason is that you permit him to post on Ceeboo's thread, posing absurd questions such as whether Ceeboo has taught his grandchild the Nazi salute yet. He also mentioned that Ceeboo's grandchild is in a difficult situation and faces significant challenges in life due to the family circumstances he'll be born into.

I’m assuming that sharing pictures on his thread to express my feelings about his progressive beliefs isn’t against the rules, especially since he’s allowed to behave like a child on Ceeboo’s thread.

Is that a correct assumption?

[canpakes]

Hello Canpakes,

Hello, Hound!

… is it against the rules to post pictures in Some Schmo's thread? I’m inquiring because I’m uncertain.

No, not at all, but as you’ve addressed your post to me specifically prior to myself even having participated in the thread, and because your post doesn’t appear to try to engage Schmo or the topic in any way, it appears that you’re wanting the thread split so that you can direct your question accordingly.

I believe the reason is that you permit him to post on Ceeboo's thread, posing absurd questions such as whether Ceeboo has taught his grandchild the Nazi salute yet. He also mentioned that Ceeboo's grandchild is in a difficult situation and faces significant challenges in life due to the family circumstances he'll be born into.

It looks like you’re trying to say that you’re not addressing SS because I permit SS to post elsewhere. It’s pretty garbled. Maybe you can rethink and repost what you’re trying to express?

I’m assuming that sharing pictures on his thread to express my feelings about his progressive beliefs isn’t against the rules, especially since he’s allowed to behave like a child on Ceeboo’s thread.

If you can actually do that, perhaps they can remain. There’s a difference between expressing your thoughts and choosing just to spam threads randomly with A.I. images, though.

Is that a correct assumption?

As just concluded above, your assumption may be faulty. But, feel free to ask more questions. I’m always happy to help.

[Hound of Heaven]

I find myself even more confused now than I was before I inquired about posting pictures on threads that don't belong to me.

In the opening of your perplexing message, you assert that posting pictures on threads I didn't initiate isn't against the rules. Yet, by the conclusion of your post, you suggest that "perhaps they can remain" if I can demonstrate that they genuinely reflect my feelings about Some Schmo in this instance.

What’s your definitive answer?

The image of a baby Homer Simpson, tears streaming down his face and clad in a diaper, effectively illustrates the point I was making about Some Schmo, wouldn’t you agree?

Your decision to remove my baby Homer Simpson picture from Schmo's thread instead of simply answering my question there, explains alot. You could have chosen to leave my picture there and copied it to start this thread, but you didn't, that also explains so much.

Will you return my picture to it's original placement?

[canpakes]

I find myself even more confused now than I was before I inquired about posting pictures on threads that don't belong to me.

.
You’ll know what to do. I believe in you, Hound.
.
.

[Hound of Heaven]

I find myself even more confused now than I was before I inquired about posting pictures on threads that don't belong to me.

You’ll know what to do. I believe in you, Hound.

Can you return my picture?

[Some Schmo]

I find myself even more confused now than I was before I inquired about posting pictures on threads that don't belong to me.

You’ll know what to do. I believe in you, Hound.

canpakes, I think you should believe Hound when he confesses he's confused. General confusion is an explanation for all of his posts. A forgiving explanation, but an explanation nonetheless.

Can you return my picture?

Wow, this is really important to you, huh?

LOL

[canpakes]

Can you return my picture?

Too late. I recycled it into a soybean-based filler material for Birkenstock shoes scheduled to be donated to woke LGBTQ track and field athletes.

[Some Schmo]

Can you return my picture?

Too late. I recycled it into a soybean-based filler material for Birkenstock shoes scheduled to be donated to woke LGBTQ track and field athletes.

I just spewed avocado toast all over my keyboard.

[Hound of Heaven]

Am I the only one who would have wagered that Some Schmo was a swallower rather than a spitter?

I consume my toast.

[Hound of Heaven]

I find myself even more confused now than I was before I inquired about posting pictures on threads that don't belong to me.

You’ll know what to do. I believe in you, Hound.

Since you started this thread for me to ask questions, is Some Schmo calling Ceeboo "damned retarded" against the rules?