Rockland County Lawsuit
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 4:37 pm
If this has been posted about before, I apologize. I just don't recall seeing it.
Right now, there's a lawsuit making its way through the court system regarding the last election. If the preliminary evidence is accurate, there's one heckuva statistical anomaly, and voters who didn't have their votes counted.
For some background, the key to this resides in how Rockland County votes were counted in the election. As an example, in NY district 55, 909 people voted for Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand. Of those 909 people who voted for the Democratic Senator, only 2 voted for the Democratic Presidential candidate, Kamala Harris. A similar thing happened in district 35. There were 331 voters who cast ballots for the Democratic Senator, while there were zero votes cast for Kamala Harris (552 votes were cast for Trump).
As an added curveball, there were affidavits collected of more than 2 voters in district 55 that attested they voted for Harris (remember, only 2 votes were counted).
It's possible that Harris was such a horrible candidate that voters in these districts were willing to take the time to vote for Gillibrand, and not Harris. It's possible that people were willing to commit perjury in signing the affidavits that they voted for Harris in the election.
Or maybe, as Trump has said when thanking Musk for helping win the election, Elon Musk "knows those vote counting computers."
I believe the last ruling was that discovery is to proceed forward.
News Link
Right now, there's a lawsuit making its way through the court system regarding the last election. If the preliminary evidence is accurate, there's one heckuva statistical anomaly, and voters who didn't have their votes counted.
For some background, the key to this resides in how Rockland County votes were counted in the election. As an example, in NY district 55, 909 people voted for Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand. Of those 909 people who voted for the Democratic Senator, only 2 voted for the Democratic Presidential candidate, Kamala Harris. A similar thing happened in district 35. There were 331 voters who cast ballots for the Democratic Senator, while there were zero votes cast for Kamala Harris (552 votes were cast for Trump).
As an added curveball, there were affidavits collected of more than 2 voters in district 55 that attested they voted for Harris (remember, only 2 votes were counted).
It's possible that Harris was such a horrible candidate that voters in these districts were willing to take the time to vote for Gillibrand, and not Harris. It's possible that people were willing to commit perjury in signing the affidavits that they voted for Harris in the election.
Or maybe, as Trump has said when thanking Musk for helping win the election, Elon Musk "knows those vote counting computers."
I believe the last ruling was that discovery is to proceed forward.
News Link