Ray A wrote:Tal Bachman wrote:Anyway, it is very strange - the world famous scholar's book on Muhammad, only two hundred and thirty eight thousand, three hundred and forty three places out of first place on the Amazon sales chart, wasn't published by any university press, or any mainstream publishing company. It was published by a religious publishing outfit called Eerdman's.
by the way, Herr Bachmann, please note why I responded by quoting Amazon reviews.
YOU orignally brought this up, goof!
Eerdman's, in case you didn't know, has been a well known publisher of school textbooks and lesson materials for many years. I presume you went to school? And further, you use the "guilt by association" method because of your extremely narrow thinking. Publishers, unlike you and your denizens on RFM, accept a wide variety of viewpoints.
I'm curious, how many other notable scholars have published with Eardman's?
I am wondering if Eardman's is something akin to a vanity press, but I have no idea whether it is. Just curious.
Hate to break it to you Ray, but there's a big diff between Amazaon sales chart and Amazon reviews. A snide, throwaway comment on the obscurity of the book by citing sales figures has nothing to do with who is reviewing it. You are using kumquats to justify persimmons.
I think we can all agree, can we not, that DCP is NOT a "renown" scholar of Middle Eastern studies by any stretch of the imagination.
Why is it necessary to point this out?
Simply because it removes the fig leaf of DCP's wider credibility and reveals that there's nothing there; he's not some world-class scholar weighing in on Mormon issues (and thus by implication giving added weight to his views), but he's an obscure professor at an obscure university whose views have no greater weight than anyone else's. This is a very unsettling thought to people unsure of their own views who take refuge in the shadow of DCP's presumed immense reputation and credibility.
God . . . "who mouths morals to other people and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, . . . and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites this poor, abused slave to worship him ..."