auteur55 wrote:Really? How do you explain Joe breaking the law, lying to the members/public, going against his own canonized scripture and cheating on his wife, all in the name of polygamy?
Breaking the law:
When was he convicted of anything?
lying to the members:
What you call lying I call protecting, intermingled with a bit of fear.
going against his own canonized scripture:
I don't believe he ever did. I've been shown some of these contradictions but they aren't as persuasive to me as they are to some. The whole religion doesn't crumble due to some supposed scriptural contradictions.
Cheating on his wife:
This is between him, Emma and God
all in the name of polygamy?:
I think very little of what he did was in the name of polygamy.
I would like to post a quote from Guy Sager that sums up for me how disturbing it is when LDS members defend Joseph Smith's immoral behavior:
The Old Testament, for example, is morally abysmal, yet believers accept it hook line and sinker with nary any indication that they find it the least bit troubling.
If one can accept without moral reflection genocide, murder, rape, and slavery, why would polygamy cause them any moral qualms?
The real interesting question here is how religion (or dogmatic belief more generally) serves to effectively to dull the moral sensibilities of otherwise decent, fair, reasonable people.