The idolatry of Abraham's fathers as midrash on Hebrews 12

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

The idolatry of Abraham's fathers as midrash on Hebrews 12

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

It has frequently been noted that the Book of Abraham says that Abraham's father Terah-- and his "fathers" in general-- were idolators. According to William V. Smith of the BOAP, the Book of Jubilees records that Abraham's father and grandfather were idolators, which information was not available to Joseph Smith at the time of composing the Book of Abraham (JSCOM, p. 34). I and others on this forum have observed in the past that according to Joshua 24:2, "Long ago your forefathers, including Terah the father of Abraham and Nahor, lived beyond the River and worshiped other gods." I still think this may constitute part of the background behind the charge in the Book of Abraham that "My fathers...turned from their righteousness, and from the holy commandments which the Lord their God had given unto them, unto the worshipping of the Gods of the heathens." Note especially the similarity of Joshua 24:2 to the last, italicized phrase. But further investigation reveals another interesting backdrop for the Book of Abraham's allegation: Genesis 17:3-7,11-12 in the JST.

Genesis 17:3-7 (JST)
3 And it came to pass, that Abram fell on his face, and called upon the name of the Lord.
4 And God talked with him, saying, My people have gone astray from my precepts, and have not kept mine ordinances, which I gave unto their fathers;
5 And they have not observed mine anointing, and the burial, or baptism wherewith I commanded them;
6 But have turned from the commandment, and taken unto themselves the washing of children, and the blood of sprinkling;
7 And have said that the blood of the righteous Abel was shed for sins; and have not known wherein they are accountable before me.
...
11 And I will establish a covenant of circumcision with thee, and it shall be my covenant between me and thee, and thy seed after thee, in their generations; that thou mayest know for ever that children are not accountable before me until they are eight years old.
12 And thou shalt observe to keep all my covenants wherein I covenanted with thy fathers; and thou shalt keep the commandments which I have given thee with mine own mouth, and I will be a God unto thee and thy seed after thee.


This passage would have been "translated" by March 7, 1831 (for JST chronology see here), a time period when infant baptism and its theological corollary original sin were central concerns for Joseph Smith (cf. Moroni 8:1-12, 14, 20, 22; D&C 20:71, 68:25-28; Moses 6:54). This JST passage was apparently formulated as a condemnation of infant baptism. It is probably also a midrash on Hebrews 12:24.

Hebrews 12:18-24 (KJV)
18 For ye are not come unto the mount that might be touched, and that burned with fire, nor unto blackness, and darkness, and tempest,
19 And the sound of a trumpet, and the voice of words; which voice they that heard intreated that the word should not be spoken to them any more:
20 (For they could not endure that which was commanded, And if so much as a beast touch the mountain, it shall be stoned, or thrust through with a dart:
21 And so terrible was the sight, that Moses said, I exceedingly fear and quake:)
22 But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,
23 To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,
24 And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.


This passage in Hebrews is contrasting the terrible old covenant (vv. 18-21) with the wonderful new covenant (vv. 22-24). The reference in v. 24, which to a casual reader might seem to contrast the sprinkling of Jesus' blood with the sprinkling of Abel's blood, may have seemed enigmatic to Joseph Smith. The actual referent of the verse is undoubtedly referring to Genesis 4:10:

Genesis 4:10-13 (KJV)
10 And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.
11 And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother’s blood from thy hand;
12 When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.
13 And Cain said unto the LORD, My punishment is greater than I can bear.


Here Cain's blood, which has been spilled by his brother Abel, "speaks" a curse. By contrast, Jesus' spilled blood "speaks" a blessing: it becomes for us the atoning "blood of sprinkling". (In the Old Testament, the blood of a sacrificial animal would be sprinkled for purposes of atonement and purification; cf. Lev. 5:9, 16:15).

The JST, however, interprets Hebrews 12:24 as a reference to some sort of ritual involving the sprinkling of Abel's blood. So Joseph Smith gives us JST-Genesis 17:3-7,11-2, which describes a heresy perpetrated by Abraham's "fathers" in which the blood of Abel apparently was thought to atone for sin, and in which infant baptism was practiced. This heresy also included a going astray from precepts, a turning from commandments, and a non-observance of ordinances (anointing and baptism are specifically mentioned). There is no mention of the worship of other gods, so I think we can conclude that when Joseph Smith penned this section he was unaware of Joshua 24:2.

Abraham 1:5 gives a description of Abraham's fathers' heresy that is in some ways similar to and in some ways different from what we find in Genesis 17.

Abraham 1:5-7,27
5 My fathers, having turned from their righteousness, and from the holy commandments which the Lord their God had given unto them, unto the worshiping of the gods of the heathen, utterly refused to hearken to my voice;
6 For their hearts were set to do evil, and were wholly turned to the god of Elkenah, and the god of Libnah, and the god of Mahmackrah, and the god of Korash, and the god of Pharaoh, king of Egypt;
7 Therefore they turned their hearts to the sacrifice of the heathen in offering up their children unto these dumb idols, and hearkened not unto my voice, but endeavored to take away my life by the hand of the priest of Elkenah. The priest of Elkenah was also the priest of Pharaoh.
...
27 Now, Pharaoh being of that lineage by which he could not have the right of Priesthood, notwithstanding the Pharaohs would fain claim it from Noah, through Ham, therefore my father was led away by their idolatry;


Here again there is a turning from righteounsness and from God's holy commandments. And, as in the JST, it is not a wholly pagan system that Terah has turned to. In fact, the reason he was led astray is that the pharaohs had a seemingly legitimate claim to the priesthood via Noah. But this description of the fathers' heresy differs from JST Gen 17 in that it includes idolatry and child sacrifice. Perhaps these additional elements were inspired by the facsimile 1 vignette, or perhaps they are derived from the Prophet's reading of Joshua 24:2 subsequent to his work on JST Genesis. It also differs in that there is no mention of Abel, infant baptism, or the "sprinkling of blood". Perhaps these had simply ceased to be concerns for Joseph Smith by 1835, or perhaps they would have cropped up later in the Book of Abraham had the Prophet gotten around to completing his work on the book.

In any case, I think it's probable that JST Genesis 17 and KJV Joshua 24:2 together form a common background for this locus in the Book of Abraham.

-CK
_KimberlyAnn
_Emeritus
Posts: 3171
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:03 pm

Post by _KimberlyAnn »

What a great observation, CaliforniaKid!

Intensely studying the JST or the Books of Abraham and Moses has never been a priority for me, and probably never will be, but I do enjoy reading your posts and learning from them.

Though this isn't completely on-topic for this thread, I wanted to give the link to an article which I believe you mentioned earlier in a different thread in the Terrestrial forum. It's Anthony Hutchinson's A Mormon Midrash. I printed it off and have yet to finish reading it, but I intend to get to it right away! Here's the link for anyone interested, but beware, it takes forever to download for some reason, at least it did for me:

http://content.lib.utah.edu/cdm4/docume ... 8834&REC=2

Thanks for the interesting posts, CK.

KA
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

KimberlyAnn wrote:Intensely studying the JST or the Books of Abraham and Moses has never been a priority for me, and probably never will be, but I do enjoy reading your posts and learning from them.


Thanks for reading!

Though this isn't completely on-topic for this thread, I wanted to give the link to an article which I believe you mentioned earlier in a different thread in the Terrestrial forum. It's Anthony Hutchinson's A Mormon Midrash. I printed it off and have yet to finish reading it, but I intend to get to it right away! Here's the link for anyone interested, but beware, it takes forever to download for some reason, at least it did for me:

http://content.lib.utah.edu/cdm4/docume ... 8834&REC=2


YES! An excellent essay! Download it and read it! :-)

-CK
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

Bump for Don... :-P
_DonBradley
_Emeritus
Posts: 1118
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:58 am

Post by _DonBradley »

CaliforniaKid wrote:Bump for Don... :-P


<Grin> I guess you know me pretty well!

I'm confident, CK, in your hypothesis about the exegetical origins of Terah's heretical faith in the Book of Abraham. You cover the unfolding of Smith's interpretations and compositions beautifully.

I'm trying to think what I may have to pitch in. I've done some past exegetical work on JST Genesis 17, but I don't know how relevant it is to the issue of Terah's apostate faith.

One thought I had while reading this write-up was that their may be substantive links between the themes of infant baptism and child sacrifice, or between those of the sacrifice of Abel as a sort of atonement and the continuing sacrifice of children. It's also possible that these are more or less accidental parallels, although the notion of human sacrifice may well, in each case, have been prompted in part by Abraham's own attempted sacrifice of Isaac. for what it's worth, I rather doubt that the completed Book of Abraham would have addressed infant baptism, since Joseph Smith seems to me to have tailored his scriptural productions primarily to his current interests, often simply forgetting past revelations.

Another possible source for the passages in question may be revealed in Abraham 1's idea of the turning of hearts, which Abraham repeatedly uses with reference to his "fathers." While the terminology of turning hearts is relatively common in the canon, the specific notion of "fathers" 'turning their hearts' is elsewhere found primarily, if not exclusively, in Malachi 4:5-6 and its various quotations and paraphrases. And Joseph Smith later associated the turning of the hearts with the planting of promises made to the fathers (e.g., the Abrahamic covenant) and associated Elias with "the Gospel of Abraham."

Abraham's immediate "fathers" in Abraham 1, who follow Pharaoh's false claim to priesthood, are implicitly contrasted with the earlier "fathers" from whom the right to the true patriarchal priesthood descended to Abraham. And these fathers are described as "turn[ing] their hearts" not only from God, but to human sacrifice, including the sacrifice of children. They thus turn their hearts entirely away from their children, including Abraham, whose sacrifice they both approve of and facilitate. Even Abraham's own personal father, Terah, "utterly refused to hearken" to him, and apparently helped deliver him up for sacrifice. And just as Abraham's immediate fathers turned their hearts away from him and their other children, Abraham turned his heart back to his ancient fathers and the priesthood promises made to them, and, through faithfulness, inherited by him.

Malachi 4:5-6 and the patriarchal priesthood theme of Abraham 1 may thus help explain the chapter's interest in Abraham's immediate "fathers," the nature of their sins, and the language of "turning their hearts."

There is, by the way, a typo you'll want to correct, where you transpose the names Cain and Abel.

And, hey, Shades, if you're reading this, if you ever let all these posts disappear, I will shave your head completely bald.

Don
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

DonBradley wrote:And, hey, Shades, if you're reading this, if you ever let all these posts disappear, I will shave your head completely bald.


Good. That'll allow me to skip a day!
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

I think you're right about the turning of the hearts bit. By the way, since we're talking about fathers and patriarchal priesthood, there's a place (I forget exactly where) where Smith calls his own father a "prince of peace" in association with patriarchal priesthood. This phrase is also used of Abraham in association with patriarchal priesthood in the early verses of the Book of Abraham.
_DonBradley
_Emeritus
Posts: 1118
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:58 am

Post by _DonBradley »

CaliforniaKid wrote:I think you're right about the turning of the hearts bit. By the way, since we're talking about fathers and patriarchal priesthood, there's a place (I forget exactly where) where Smith calls his own father a "prince of peace" in association with patriarchal priesthood. This phrase is also used of Abraham in association with patriarchal priesthood in the early verses of the Book of Abraham.


Huh, that's of interest to me. I know he speaks of "Michael the prince" in connection with his father's patriarchal authority, but I didn't realize he called his father a "prince of peace." I'll look for the reference. Do you recall about when Smith says this?

Don
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

Here's the reference I was thinking of. This is from Peterson, H. Donl. The Story of the Book of Abraham: Mummies, Manuscripts, and Mormonism. Salt Lake City, UT: Deseret Book, 1995, p. 260.

Abraham desired to become a "prince of peace."
Only four men are identified with this title in the standard
works: Adam, Melchizedek, Abraham, and Jesus. The
title is mentioned in the scriptures pertaining to Adam
(D&C 107:54-55) when Jesus himself blessed Adam and
called him "Michael, the prince, the archangel." President
John Taylor was more specific when he stated that Jesus
called Adam "Michael, the Archangel, the Prince of
Peace." 1 Melchizedek, who ordained Abraham, also held
that holy title (Alma 13:18). It is assumed that Abraham,
in his desire for greater blessings as a patriarch,
achieved his goal to become "a prince of peace." The
Lord changed Abram's name to Abraham, which means
"father of a multitude." Jesus is the one most frequently
identified with this title. (See Isaiah 9:6.) When Joseph
Smith Jr. ordained his own father to the office of
patriarch, he said that Joseph Smith Sr. "shall be called a
prince over them, and shall be numbered among those
who hold the right of Patriarchal Priesthood, even the
keys of the ministry." After quoting Doctrine and Covenants
107:53-55, relative to Adam being a prince forever, the
Prophet declared: "So shall it be with my father; he shall
be called a prince over his posterity, holding the keys of
the Patriarchal Priesthood." 2 The title apparently has a
patriarchal connotation of eternal importance.


Footnotes 1 and 2, on p. 265, say

1. Journal of Discourses 26:129.
2. Joseph Fielding McConkie, His Name Shall Be Joseph (Salt Lake City: Hawkes Publishing,
1980), 101-2.
_DonBradley
_Emeritus
Posts: 1118
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:58 am

Post by _DonBradley »

Ah, thanks CK!
Post Reply