Buffalo wrote:Do you have a more credible source to offer?
There are other discussions. If I had the time right now -- I don't -- I would locate a few of them for you.
But your demand for a "more credible source" is a bit amusing, since you seem to imagine that a journalist's newspaper report is the final word on this question.
Buffalo wrote:That one didn't address the issue we're discussing, but rather focused on past accusations that have nothing to do with the high numbers of depressed Utahans, and made a weak pass at a correlation vs causation defense.
I think it actually addressed the issue reasonably well.
Your article, by contrast, said nothing about Mormons at all. Do you seriously think that it's Mormonism that causes the alleged high rate of depression in Utah? On the basis of what do you believe that? Is it Mormonism that is also responsible for the alleged high rates of depression in the other high-ranking states of Idaho, Nevada, and Wyoming? Do you think that their geographical proximity is purely coincidental?
This is a complex issue, and your newspaper article doesn't really address it.
Buffalo wrote:Even if Mormonism doesn't CAUSE depression, surely the statistics published in Deseret news refute your assertion that "we're a cheerful, optimistic, and positive bunch, on the whole. Very much so, in fact."
I stand by that. Believing Latter-day Saints are a cheerful, optimistic, and positive bunch, strikingly unburdened with angst and gloom.
Buffalo wrote:Regardless of the causes, Mormons are depressed in greater numbers than the gentiles.
Did you actually
read the article to which I provided a link? Did you read the section entitled "Are Mormons more depressed than non-Mormons?"