subgenius wrote:son of Ishmael wrote:Hey! The Book of Mormon mentions food and there was food in the Americas when the spanish got here so that is a check in the "for" box too. Trees are mentioned and so are hills and the sky is mentioned and I think air is mentioned too. Wow! just spend a little time reading the Book of Mormon and just watch that "for" box just fill up.
Forget stupid things like the horses, olives, wine, steel, honey bees, cattle, oxen, donkeys, goats and wild goats, sheep, swine and elephants, wheat, barley,silk, cimeters, the seven day week. And forget that fact that the Book of Mormon doesn't mention important foods known to ancient America such as chocolate, lima beans, squash, potatoes, tomatoes, and manioc.
so had there been a few more recipes you would be convinced...great point!
are you sure you understand the difference between
evidence for and
degrees of certainty? (cuz, honestly, it seems like you do not)
and why are you here again?
If there were no issues with things like horses, olives, wine, steel, honey bees, cattle, oxen, donkeys, goats, wild goats, sheep, swine, elephants, wheat, barley, silk, cimetars, the seven day week, chocolate, lima beans, squash, potatoes, tomatoes, manioc, etc, then believing in the Book of Mormon could really be an act of faith. If the Book of Mormon was evidence neutral or at least mostly evidence neutral, then I think it would be reasonable to say to someone that they have to have faith to believe it. As it stands now, you not only have to have a faith, you have to be willing and able to suspend reason, intellect and common sense.
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. - Galileo
Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man. - The Dude
Don't you know there ain't no devil, there's just god when he's drunk - Tom Waits