Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _LittleNipper »

Gunnar wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:According to whom? What about dark matter and quantum physics?

Nothing about dark matter and quantum physics either requires or precludes the existence of God (as far as I can tell).
It seems to me that logic states that life originated from somewhere.

Obviously! Duh!
If life cannot be proven to be spontaniously forming now, then it never happened in the past.

That does not necessarily follow. Once life formed (whether spontaneously or not) and became well established, any subsequent spontaneous formation of life would be immediately swallowed up by already established lifeforms. Thus the probability of observing and proving subsequent spontaneous generation of life in nature would necessarily be zero--even if it happened.
So a scientist must either be able to manufacture life or be faced with the reality that life was created supernaturally. It is a total fraud of science to continue to propose that life is just a fact of a "natural process" and then not find it anywhere else in the universe or not be able to develope it. Only God can create life. And the proof is the very fact you exist.

Patent nonsense! You can't claim that anything is necessarily impossible based on what scientists have not yet been able to do! Suppose that tomorrow, scientists announce and prove that they have succeeded in creating self-replicating, life-like forms, would you then admit the fact (or, at least, the probability) of evolution? I doubt it! You would merely move the goalpost and claim that this proved only that intelligent design was needed for the creation of life.

Similarly, if scientists discovered unmistakable proof of extraterrestrial life, would you then admit the reality or the possibility of evolution? Again, I doubt it. The fact that scientists have not yet done so means absolutely nothing! Tell me, LN, do you think it is at all likely that in the entire, observable universe of hundreds of billions of galaxies and countless trillions of trillions of stars, that our, tiny, insignifant little planet is the only abode of life? What a horrendous waste of real estate that would be!

Besides that, even if it is true that only a god can create life (which it is admittedly impossible at this point to rule out entirely), that does not necessarily imply that he/she/it had to use supernatural means to do it--nor does it rule out or demolish the fact of evolution, which is only concerned with how life changed and developed after its initial origin--not how it originated.

Nothing about dark matter and quantum physics either requires or precludes the existence of God (as far as you can tell) --- It still requires a leap of faith on the part of those scientists who accept such.
I can claim that life with creation is necessarily impossible if scientists cannot forulate it! I firmly believe man will never create life from inert matter. And until they do, any notion that a nonliving environment could concoct life is but a fairy tale and the only logical solution is the finger of GOD created life...
_Gunnar
_Emeritus
Posts: 6315
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:17 am

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _Gunnar »

Little Nipper, nothing about dark matter or quantum physics requires any "leap of faith" on the part of scientists. The gravitational effects of dark matter on the motions of distant stars and galaxies has been detected and analyzed to the point that they have been able to map out where much of the dark matter exists. In fact, it is only because they discovered these gravitational anomalies that it became necessary to suspect that it even existed in the first place! Many scientists were not particularly pleased with the discovery of dark matter, but being honest scientists, they could not deny the evidence of it. They know something they can't see is causing those gravitational anomalies. Since they can't see it and gravity is a known property of matter, it seemed appropriate to call it "dark matter."

Quantum physics doesn't require any "leap of faith" either, as quantum theory has been experimentally tested and verified by every test scientific ingenuity has been able to come up with, and has passed every test, so far, with flying colors. The successful design of modern, advanced electronic devices, including the computer you are using to make these posts, absolutely depends, in part, on the use of quantum theory. The simple, undeniable fact that these devices work as predicted by quantum mechanics is the strongest evidence we can possibly have of its validity. Is it complete and fully understood yet? Probably not, but we certainly understand it well enough to make very effective use of it indeed!
No precept or claim is more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.

“If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you.”
― Harlan Ellison
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _LittleNipper »

Gunnar wrote:Little Nipper, nothing about dark matter or quantum physics requires any "leap of faith" on the part of scientists. The gravitational effects of dark matter on the motions of distant stars and galaxies has been detected and analyzed to the point that they have been able to map out where much of the dark matter exists. In fact, it is only because they discovered these gravitational anomalies that it became necessary to suspect that it even existed in the first place! Many scientists were not particularly pleased with the discovery of dark matter, but being honest scientists, they could not deny the evidence of it. They know something they can't see is causing those gravitational anomalies. Since they can't see it and gravity is a known property of matter, it seemed appropriate to call it "dark matter."

Quantum physics doesn't require any "leap of faith" either, as quantum theory has been experimentally tested and verified by every test scientific ingenuity has been able to come up with, and has passed every test, so far, with flying colors. The successful design of modern, advanced electronic devices, including the computer you are using to make these posts, absolutely depends, in part, on the use of quantum theory. The simple, undeniable fact that these devices work as predicted by quantum mechanics is the strongest evidence we can possibly have of its validity. Is it complete and fully understood yet? Probably not, but we certainly understand it well enough to make very effective use of it indeed!

So scientist must believe in invisible matter but believers cannot say God does it. Doesn't that smack of hypocrisy?
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _Themis »

LittleNipper wrote:So scientist must believe in invisible matter but believers cannot say God does it. Doesn't that smack of hypocrisy?


Scientists don't have to believe, they have evidence for dark matter, so it's really not invisible to detection. Believer's in what ever God or Gods can say anything they want. Just don't expect many converts to claims without any evidence, especially if evidence is against those claims.
42
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _subgenius »

Themis wrote:Scientists don't have to believe, they have evidence for dark matter...

inference and estimation is evidence now?!?
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _Res Ipsa »

subgenius wrote:
Themis wrote:Scientists don't have to believe, they have evidence for dark matter...

inference and estimation is evidence now?!?


How do you define evidence?
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _LittleNipper »

Themis wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:So scientist must believe in invisible matter but believers cannot say God does it. Doesn't that smack of hypocrisy?


Scientists don't have to believe, they have evidence for dark matter, so it's really not invisible to detection. Believer's in what ever God or Gods can say anything they want. Just don't expect many converts to claims without any evidence, especially if evidence is against those claims.

How do they know it isn't God? My guess is that you don't see the existance of the Jew and the nation of Israel as evidence of a promise God made to Abraham thousands of years ago.
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _Quasimodo »

LittleNipper wrote:How do they know it isn't God? My guess is that you don't see the existance of the Jew and the nation of Israel as evidence of a promise God made to Abraham thousands of years ago.


For the same reason they know it wasn't the Easter Bunny. There is just no reason to believe it. The nation of Israel has no bearing on the issue. Nor does Jewish mythology.

What you believe is of no value in determining what happened in the Earth's history any more than what Sioux Indians or Hindus believe.

It's fine for you to believe those things, but you really can't expect people, searching for the real truth of things, to believe it too.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _Themis »

LittleNipper wrote:How do they know it isn't God?


HuH? You come up with the weirdest questions that have nothing to do with the topic. Scientists don't say anything about God. Things like dark matter or the big bang are not really theories about God existing or not. There is no evidence to even bring up the question of God's existence. The problem may be accepting the hard science behind some of these theories shows your beliefs in a YEC incorrect. It doesn't really have anything to do with God/Gods/Goddesses existing or not.
42
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _ludwigm »

Themis wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:How do they know it isn't God?
HuH? You come up with the weirdest questions that have nothing to do with the topic. Scientists don't say anything about God. Things like dark matter or the big bang are not really theories about God existing or not. There is no evidence to even bring up the question of God's existence. The problem may be accepting the hard science behind some of these theories shows your beliefs in a YEC incorrect. It doesn't really have anything to do with God/Gods/Goddesses existing or not.

Pierre-Simon Laplace said:
- "[Sire,] je n'A.I. pas eu besoin de cette hypothèse."
(Translation: "[No, Sire,] I had no need of that hypothesis.")
Reputed reply to Emperor Napoleon I, who had asked why he hadn't mentioned God in his discourse on secular variations of the orbits of Saturn and Jupiter ("Mais où est Dieu dans tout cela?"/'But where is God in all this?').

Stephen Hawking said in 1999, "I don't think that Laplace was claiming that God does not exist. It's just that he doesn't intervene, to break the laws of Science."

Something beautiful from Laplace (spherical harmonics...):
[#img] http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/7/9/e/ ... f1b868.png[/img]
[#img] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... monics.gif[/img]
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
Post Reply