Bible verse by verse

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _LittleNipper »

Gunnar wrote:LittleNipper, you said:
I only believe what the Bible says.
If you really meant that literally, then you are indeed appallingly, willfully and obstinately ignorant. I don't actually think that you believe and know only what is in the Bible. If that were really true, you would be unemployable for anything but unskilled, manual labor (if even that), and would probably not be able to afford the computer you use to access the internet, and would almost certainly not know how to use it or keep it updated even if you had one.

I'm sure that you never attacked and burned a library, but the kind of mindset exemplified by your ignorant statement is precisely what enabled both fanatical Christians and Muslims to justify destroying recorded truths and knowledge they didn't understand or that conflicted with what they would rather believe. It is true that eventually Christians and even Muslims established schools that helped to further literacy, knowledge and progress, but I guarantee that they were not the same type of Christians who ignorantly and arrogantly denied the truth of anything not found in the Bible!

Speaking of Muslims, if you knew your history, you would know that we owe the Muslim Moors of Spain and other Muslim scholars around the same time a great debt of gratitude for preserving much of what was valuable from ancient Greek, Indian and Middle Eastern science and literature during the time that Christian Europe stagnated and even retrogressed during the "Dark Ages." It was the Arabians' invention of algebra and the introduction to Europe of "Arabic numerals" that helped to spark the European Renaissance that led to modern advances in math and science. These Arab scholars also made some of the earliest advances in anatomy, medicine and chemistry that Christian Europe later built upon to create the foundation for modern chemistry and medicine. It is a crying shame that after such a promising start, the Islamic world later became as intolerant of new and independent secular thought as the Christians were during the European Dark Ages!

If humankind believed and knew only what was in the Judeo-Christian Bible, we would still be living the primitive existence endured by the original writers of the books that were eventually compiled into what we now call "The Bible." We would not have the modern benefits of rapid transportation and communication nor the comforts we now enjoy nor the advances of modern medicine that make possible our present, high life expectancy. Without the advances in agriculture, food production, refrigeration and food preservation techniques made since Biblical times, the World would only be able to support a small fraction of its present population.

The painstakingly worked out and discovered scientific theories that inform our present understanding of the size and age of the Universe and how it works, are the same theories that make much of the advanced technology we now rely on so heavily work for us. The simple, undeniable fact that we are able to design and build advanced devices using these theories that then proceed to work as predicted by them is the strongest evidence we can possibly have that those theories are essentially correct. The very computer you are using to access this forum is compelling evidence that modern scientists' understanding of The Universe and how it works is essentially correct. Are these theories incapable of still further improvement as we gain ever more knowledge? Probably not, but it is certain that the additional knowledge needed to further refine them will not come from reading the Bible! Even as they now stand, they are very good indeed! Modern Quantum Theory and General and Special Relativity theories have been experimentally verified to at least a dozen or so decimal places. Because of this, it is simply neither reasonable nor honest for anyone who knows and understands them to doubt what they tell us about the size and age of The Universe. If you think the Bible tells you differently, then either the Bible is in error, or you are misinterpreting what it says. There is simply no other viable alternative.

I believe that God has encouraged research and fostered human creativity. I feel strongly that as man moves towards God, society profits, and education becomes interestingly fun and provocative. I also firmly believe that as man moves away from God, education becomes a drudge and society flounders in its own excrement. Seeing investigation as its own ends but not for the betterment of man as its intent, the pockets of a select few are filled. Such come to believe that they are above morality ---- in fact they believe they have the right to design ethics to suit their own pleasures, and the welfare of the public be damned or controlled/manipulated. The fact is, I see prophetically from the Bible, the beginning of a one world government under an Anti-Christ, controlled by a police state, where humanism reigns as the "new" religious order (do as I command and not as I do).
Last edited by Guest on Thu Jan 02, 2014 11:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
_Gunnar
_Emeritus
Posts: 6315
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:17 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _Gunnar »

I think it is more important to honestly strive to move toward greater knowledge and better understanding without presupposing the existence of God. If God is real, this should automatically lead to God eventually. However, IMHO, from what I have learned about history, especially scientific history, presupposing God and Biblical inerrancy has more often than not been a serious impediment to real progress in human knowledge and scientific achievement. The early and vehement resistance of both Protestants and Catholics to the Heliocentric model of the Solar System and the consequent vilification and/or prosecution of Copernicus, Kepler and Galileo, and the burning at the stake of Giordano Bruno for proposing that the stars might merely be other suns with inhabited worlds circling them are just a few of many prime examples of that.
No precept or claim is more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.

“If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you.”
― Harlan Ellison
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _Bazooka »

Nipper, you seem to be dead set against "do as I comnand and not as I do".
Yet that is exactly how your God governs. Ironic, huh?
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
_Gunnar
_Emeritus
Posts: 6315
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:17 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _Gunnar »

Bazooka wrote:Nipper, you seem to be dead set against "do as I comnand and not as I do".
Yet that is exactly how your God governs. Ironic, huh?

Obviously, Bazooka, LittleNipper is not opposed to God ruling that way. His God can do no wrong no matter what he does, even if He would condemn any human for doing the same thing. It's only wrong for any humans to rule that way. Religious fundamentalists like him are not really opposed to a police-state-like one world government, as long as they think God or Christ is at the head of it. They are convinced that that is what will eventually happen at Christ's second coming and that it would be blasphemy to advocate establishing any semblance of or approximation to a one world government of any type by secular means before that eventuality. They already protest against what they perceive as the increasing secularity of existing governments.
No precept or claim is more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.

“If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you.”
― Harlan Ellison
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _LittleNipper »

Gunnar wrote:
Bazooka wrote:Nipper, you seem to be dead set against "do as I comnand and not as I do".
Yet that is exactly how your God governs. Ironic, huh?

Obviously, Bazooka, LittleNipper is not opposed to God ruling that way. His God can do no wrong no matter what he does, even if He would condemn any human for doing the same thing. It's only wrong for any humans to rule that way. Religious fundamentalists like him are not really opposed to a police-state-like one world government, as long as they think God or Christ is at the head of it. They are convinced that that is what will eventually happen at Christ's second coming and that it would be blasphemy to advocate establishing any semblance of or approximation to a one world government of any type by secular means before that eventuality. They already protest against what they perceive as the increasing secularity of existing governments.

Are you for or against environmental conservation? Does one conserve natural resources by wasting them? God is the Creator of the environment, and yet you seem to have the notion that man knows better than Him when it comes to ruling over this planet. Not a very logical stance on your part. I'm sure that Christ would rule perfectly. He would be just, righteous, loving, and do it all perfectly. Secular governments are actually very religious. They simply apply their own designed ethics to gain and hold power. They are not righteous, loving, nor perfect.
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _LittleNipper »

Bazooka wrote:Nipper, you seem to be dead set against "do as I comnand and not as I do".
Yet that is exactly how your God governs. Ironic, huh?

I believe God provided hell for everyone bent on controlling their own destiny, so they can live exactly as they are capable, on their own power. Someday, you may that have such an opportunity to attempt to better God for an eternity. I pray that you do not. My guess is that such a one will be unable to accomplish anything --- no hope and only despair.
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _Bazooka »

LittleNipper wrote:
Bazooka wrote:Nipper, you seem to be dead set against "do as I comnand and not as I do".
Yet that is exactly how your God governs. Ironic, huh?

I believe God provided hell for everyone bent on controlling their own destiny, so they can live exactly as they are capable, on their own power. Someday, you may that have such an opportunity to attempt to better God for an eternity. I pray that you do not. My guess is that such a one will be unable to accomplish anything --- no hope and only despair.


I believe God provided hell for everyone bent on claiming their belief is better than anyone elses.
At least you'll be warm and you won't have to think for yourself.
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
_huckelberry
_Emeritus
Posts: 4559
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 2:29 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _huckelberry »

Bazooka wrote:
LittleNipper wrote: It is part of a much larger plan which may affect both the perpetrator, the victim, and others connected to both.


So, knowing this, why would you intervene and spoil God's plan for the perpatrator, the victim and those connected to them?
Surely it is therefore better to let God's plan take its course even though He has decided some innocent kid being sexually abused is worth allowing as a means to an end?

*by the way, if your God allows the sexual abuse of innocent children then He isn't a God I want anything to do with.

Bazooka ,your question was probably stronger before you added this rejoinder. Most everybody knows the answer at this point .The larger plan involves humans taking the responsibility of stopping it. God waits on his part because he wants humans to do it. That is part of the plan to solve the whole tree of sin not just selected extra obvious examples. You may remain unconvinced that Gods strategy of delegation is best but that does not mean we should not do our part to stop evil.
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _Quasimodo »

huckelberry wrote:
Bazooka wrote:So, knowing this, why would you intervene and spoil God's plan for the perpatrator, the victim and those connected to them?
Surely it is therefore better to let God's plan take its course even though He has decided some innocent kid being sexually abused is worth allowing as a means to an end?

*by the way, if your God allows the sexual abuse of innocent children then He isn't a God I want anything to do with.

Bazooka ,your question was probably stronger before you added this rejoinder. Most everybody knows the answer at this point .The larger plan involves humans taking the responsibility of stopping it. God waits on his part because he wants humans to do it. That is part of the plan to solve the whole tree of sin not just selected extra obvious examples. You may remain unconvinced that Gods strategy of delegation is best but that does not mean we should not do our part to stop evil.


Of course, the easier and more likely answer is that no God is there to intervene. It seems that God is never there when needed most (or needed least, for that matter). Maybe that's a clue.

Perhaps it's best to proceed as if there is no God and just do our best to solve problems on our own. If God eventually does show up, so much the better.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_Gunnar
_Emeritus
Posts: 6315
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:17 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _Gunnar »

LittleNipper wrote:Are you for or against environmental conservation? Does one conserve natural resources by wasting them? God is the Creator of the environment, and yet you seem to have the notion that man knows better than Him when it comes to ruling over this planet. Not a very logical stance on your part.

:question: :question: :question: What are you trying to get at here? I am definitely for environmental conservation, of course! Aren't you? Of course one does not conserve natural resources by wasting them! Do you believe otherwise or think that I do? Do you have any reason to believe that what environmental scientists, who have spent their lives studying environmental issues and how best to utilize and conserve natural resources, have come to any conclusions that would differ significantly from what an all wise and omnipotent God would tell them, even if such an entity existed?
I'm sure that Christ would rule perfectly. He would be just, righteous, loving, and do it all perfectly.

I don't doubt that an all wise, omnipotent God (if such existed) would know best how to rule this planet, but there is no human being (especially not you) whom I trust to be an infallible authority on what God says or wants of us. Given the huge number of mutually contradictory claims that various, would-be religious leaders and prophets have made, even you cannot reasonably or honestly deny that the vast majority (if not all) of them must be frauds or charlatans or simply mistaken or deluded.
Secular governments are actually very religious.

BS! That is as silly as claiming that a teetotaler is just another kind of drunk!
They simply apply their own designed ethics to gain and hold power. They are not righteous, loving, nor perfect.
That is no any less true of any theocracy that has ever existed--including the Old Testament kingdoms of Israel and Judah. There is no one I would distrust more than an aspiring political candidate who claimed a divine mandate to rule or run for office or Biblical authority for his political views!
No precept or claim is more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.

“If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you.”
― Harlan Ellison
Post Reply