LittleNipper wrote:The Erotic Apologist wrote:At least you've stopped claiming Chinese ideograms are related to the Biblical flood. That's progress, I suppose.
Not really. I do not consider modern interpretations of Chinese ideograms have anything to do with regards to the actual origin of the characters themselves...
That's because you still don't know anything about Chinese ideograms other than what you cut-and-paste (often without proper attribution) from apologetic sites. Go take a couple years worth of university-level Chinese courses while simultaneously living in China and you'll understand exactly how little you know at this point in time.
Again, this is a wonderful example of why you should do your own research instead of simply cutting-and-pasting blocks of text from wacky religious sites.
LittleNipper wrote:...which are quite ancient and often have other archaic meanings.
No, you've got it totally bass akwards.
LittleNipper wrote:It's the archaic means that seem to relate to the Biblical flood epic.
Would it surprise you to know that Chinese scholars
already know how and from where their ideograms originated? Hint: it has nothing to do with the Biblical flood.
LittleNipper wrote:And it is a fact that Chinese writing developed from a form of a picture graphic shorthand, that eventually came to represent sounds.
Congratulations, you've just described how the writing system known as the Roman Alphabet came into being. You still have no idea what you're talking about.