moksha wrote:Wonder what Russian hackers could uncover on the Clinton Foundation to aid in the Senate inquiry?
I think bleach bit may have taken care of that problem already.
"Religion is about providing human community in the guise of solving problems that don’t exist or failing to solve problems that do and seeking to reconcile these contradictions and conceal the failures in bogus explanations otherwise known as theology." - Kishkumen
moksha wrote:Wonder what Russian hackers could uncover on the Clinton Foundation to aid in the Senate inquiry?
which hackers? the same ones she and Podesta hired ?
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
subgenius wrote:politically speaking yes, but criminally speaking no.
I suspect most here have not spent many hours researching the available evidence to answer that. People like you or Ajax certainly haven't. It's understandable. We don't have that kind of time or desire to. We can use reason though to conclude whether she is likely to be guilty of criminal acts or not. First you have to try and control your extreme bias. I see that republicans have been in power for many years have have created many investigations of these allegations. I am not sure we can find any political figures, other then Trump, who have been investigated more then Hillary. If she is guilty of criminal activity they should have found it by now and republicans would certainly have made sure she was charged her by now since they control the government. Yet nothing. That tells me she is unlikely to be guilty of the crimes republicans believe she has done.
Yet if we look at Trump, we see investigations started by Republican controlled government that have resulted so far in many indictments and guilty pleas, and the investigations is not even finished yet. It's not really hard to see who is very likely to be guilty or not guilty of criminal activity here Subby.
Themis wrote:I am not sure we can find any political figures, other then Trump, who have been investigated more then Hillary. If she is guilty of criminal activity they should have found it by now and republicans would certainly have made sure she was charged her by now since they control the government. Yet nothing.
Themis wrote:Yet if we look at Trump, we see investigations started by Republican controlled government that have resulted so far in many indictments and guilty pleas, and the investigations is not even finished yet.
Yup. that is quite a contrast, I must admit.
Zadok: I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis. Maksutov: That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.