?????Fairfax vs Kavanaugh?????: Harvey Weinstein Again!

[_Bach]

So the black Lt. Gov. in Virginia, admitting that he had sex w a woman 14 years ago, is now defending himself against reports of sexual harassment accusations from that very same woman.

Bret Kavanaugh was accused of the same.

Difference:

Fairfax: He admits to the encounter, the sex and including the place and the event. It happened! Accuser apparently says she was assaulted and forced into sex.

Kavanaugh: He says it never happened, denies his presence at any event described by accuser. Accuser can’t remember time or place where she was assaulted. She claims two people were there who denied the event and ever being there in her presence.

Should we expect anything less for Fairfax to go before his accuser in a public forum or just give him the Harvey Weinstein pass of years past?

Is this not a more credible issue of a sexual harassment for Fairfax than Lazy Ford was for Kavanaugh?

Would love to hear from any who disagree.

(Shades, can you convince EA to post this today, Thanks in advance)

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Link?

- Doc

[_Bach]

Link?

- Doc

Your brain and ability to think. can't calibrate the strength of that link will be.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

[_Bach]

Where are the Bookers, Durbins, Feinstein’s and Kamals when believing Fairfax accuser as they did blindly for Lazy Ford. Can anyone here explain the difference?

And some claim this to be a highly intellectual board population. If so I just don’t understand the sudden “keyboard freeze”!?!?

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]