I read that post. It's posts like these that infused confusion into your position:
Your back and forth with EA:
EA wrote:You don't get to extort foreign allies by withholding lawfully appropriated aid to work with your personal attorney to announce a prewritten statement of investigations into your political opponent (tainting any real fact finding that could occur in the process), even if that opponent did illicit things. That you don't get this is wild. That's an egregious abuse of office regardless of whether the person is guilty.
And then you wrote this odd take in response to a very clear, concise statement on the President's unambiguous wrongoing.
honorentheos wrote:That you seem to not get the above is simply ridiculously picking and choosing a narrative that works for whatever you want it to do is certainly something.
What Biden did does matter, and it matters in both reality and in the fictional hypothetical being tossed around. Saying it doesn't is playing to a conservative mischaracterization of Democrat motives that is stupid as well as ridiculous.
What matters is in reality, what Biden did isn't what Republicans are playing off as being. And if you want to play at what ifs, it would be the scandal of the decade were it true.
It's not. Though I again I wonder if your stance on this is primarily built on holding a much more narrow and pessimistic view of Bidens actions that suggests you need to buffer it from Trump's actions. Your version of reality may be much closer to the hypothetical and, frankly, I've not seen you lay out what you think happened there which is quite suspicious in this light.
I can literally go through half a dozen pages, if you'd like, where you make this kind of odd duck post that obfuscates CLEAR and CONCISE illegal behavior by the President with whatever it is you think Biden's "actions" were, which, is especially odd since you're telling me outright that you think Biden is innocent of the charges levelled against him and, apparently, doesn't require investigating by the DoJ?
eta because I don't want to make another post just to add to the point above:
Honor, when stating the following:
honorentheos wrote:That is ignoring if Biden actually did work the withholding of aid to benefit his son, it wouldn't be clear there was wrong doing on Trump's part.
Playing some sort of weird Devil's advocate with SS muddled your position if, indeed, your statement above is accurate about your belief that Biden is innocent of GOP charges.
- Doc