Chap wrote:OK Shades. Have the guts to come straight out and say what you mean here.
Okay.
Do you believe that Obama is gay and Michelle is a transvestite, . . .
No, 'cause last time I checked, a male-to-female transsexual isn't able to have children.
. . . and that Joan Rivers was murdered to conceal that this is the case?
No, 'cause there's no use concealing a case that doesn't exist.
If you aren't sure, what likelihood do you assign to those propositions being true?
0% and 0%.
And if the answers are 'No' and '0%', what the heck do you mean by the word 'conveniently'?
It makes it much, much easier for conspiracy theorists to draw conclusions.
honorentheos wrote:You were letting a Nazi propogandist carry on for quite some time on pretense his points were tangentially about Mormonism.
Notice how he didn't reveal himself as a Nazi propagandist when he first posted?
We had to argue they were NSFW to get them moved to the telestial forum.
And notice how they were indeed moved?
ETA: I think you moved it because you a) share the views of the person in question and b) don't get that the discussion very much had to do with Mormonism because your own conspiracy theory sympathies lead you to view it as based on something other than a shared psychology.
In that case, A) you're wrong, and B) you're wrong.
Man up, Shades. You should be exposed to the ride that thread would take you on if you moved it back where it belongs.
I can take a ride just as easily here as I can there, can I not?
Simon Southerton wrote:I cannot count the number of threads on this board that are UNITED STATES or UTAH related but not directly related to Mormonism.
Notice how the ones about the United States are quickly shuttled off to the Spirit Paradise forum?
Lemmie wrote:Exactly. How did you decide Mormonism was “the focus” when the topics were holocaust denial and an argument that Jews are a lesser people?
Mormonism was never a focus of holocaust denial. Recall that that discussion came much, much later.
Regarding the former, Mormonism was the focus because it is obsessed with the gathering of the Twelve Tribes, with lineage, and with birthrights. If its teachings about birthright is fundamentally invalid, then that strikes a MAJOR blow to its legitimacy.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
--Louis Midgley