Remembering Building 7

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
BeNotDeceived
Elder
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed May 19, 2021 7:52 pm

Re: Remembering Building 7

Post by BeNotDeceived »

Snazzip wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:32 pm
BeNotDeceived wrote: Marcus, Dr. Jones was sent a container of the dust from the destruction of the twin towers from someone living in Manhattan after hearing about his research and hypothesis which was analyzed under electron microscopes at BYU where he discovered the red/gray chips of unexploded nano-thermate... there's no theory, conjecture or guess work to his findings and conclusions, only hard evidence.
How did he know what color they were?
Are you serious? Maybe because that's what color they were under the microscope. 😅🤦‍♂️
BeNotDeceived
Elder
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed May 19, 2021 7:52 pm

Re: Remembering Building 7

Post by BeNotDeceived »

Marcus wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:33 pm
BeNotDeceived wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:16 pm

Many of you need to take physics 101 to understand why your arguments don't hold any water. First off, the plane wasn't traveling at 460 mph at just 1,000 feet above ground level - ask any aviation expert what would happen to a plane traveling 460 mph 1,000 feet from the ground. Second, have the steel grates that hold your frying pan above an open flame ever melted on your stove? Or weakened? Jet fuel is 3/4 kerosene and does not burn with intense heat. Lastly, most of the jet fuel was consumed in the fireball outside the buildings and what didn't combust would have went into the towers as liquid and ignited fires inside or possibly gone down the elevator shafts, but tell me how a small amount of jet fuel can be sprayed into a building, travel 1,000 feet to ground level and then burn as molten steel? Even the first responder firefighters were perplexed by the sight of molten steel flowing like lava...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nwgkA5rlwKI
Now you are just recycling all the old debunked conspiracy theories. Why?
🤣
What was 'debunked'?
BeNotDeceived
Elder
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed May 19, 2021 7:52 pm

Re: Remembering Building 7

Post by BeNotDeceived »

Doctor Steuss wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:29 pm
BeNotDeceived wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:16 pm

Many of you need to take physics 101 to understand why your arguments don't hold any water. First off, the plane wasn't traveling at 460 mph at just 1,000 feet above ground level - ask any aviation expert what would happen to a plane traveling 460 mph 1,000 feet from the ground.
Ok, what would happen if a plane that has a take off speed of 150mph, and a cruising speed of 533mph, were to make a decent of several thousand feet per a minute, and fly into a building about 1,000 feet off the ground during that decent? According to any aviation expert?

How would a speed of 460mph for such a plane defy physics?
There's a reason planes have to fly at an altitude of over 30,000 feet when traveling 500 mph.
K Graham
God
Posts: 1676
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2021 6:25 am

Re: Remembering Building 7

Post by K Graham »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:40 pm
Who else tested Dr. Jones’ samples?

- Doc
Probably Joe Rogan and Jordan Peterson.
"I am not an American ... In my view premarital sex should be illegal" - Ajax18
Marcus
God
Posts: 6670
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: Remembering Building 7

Post by Marcus »

BeNotDeceived wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:47 pm
Marcus wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:33 pm
Now you are just recycling all the old debunked conspiracy theories. Why?
🤣
What was 'debunked'?
All of them. Now please answer my question, what's up with recycling all this very, very old and completely debunked nonsense? Is this some sock puppet just fooling around?
User avatar
Snazzip
Sunbeam
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 12:29 am

Re: Remembering Building 7

Post by Snazzip »

BeNotDeceived wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:45 pm
Snazzip wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:32 pm


How did he know what color they were?
Are you serious? Maybe because that's what color they were under the microscope. 😅🤦‍♂️
Well then screw building 7, Jones deserves a freaking Nobel prize for getting a color image from an electron microscope when he supposedly did.
User avatar
Doctor Steuss
God
Posts: 2170
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:48 pm

Re: Remembering Building 7

Post by Doctor Steuss »

BeNotDeceived wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:50 pm
I'll just say there's a reason planes have to fly over 30,000 feet at 500 mph.
Probably so they don't crash into buildings.

Incidentally, I looked up the actual spec tables for a 767. Mach 0.86 is its maximum. At sea level, that’s 655 mph.

Operationally you’d have some really big problems (if you weren’t trying to crash it), but integrity-wise, you’d be well below thresholds.
BeNotDeceived
Elder
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed May 19, 2021 7:52 pm

Re: Remembering Building 7

Post by BeNotDeceived »

Marcus wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:56 pm
BeNotDeceived wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:47 pm

🤣
What was 'debunked'?
All of them. Now please answer my question, what's up with recycling all this very, very old and completely debunked nonsense? Is this some sock puppet just fooling around?
What, government shills easily fooling people with less than avg. IQ's with junk science and hypotheses to support their conclusions? 😅🤢
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 9713
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: Remembering Building 7

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

As a reminder to BND, linking and running is verboten. You need to explain the what’s what when linking a video, and typically it’s good form to tell us what timestamp is the money shot.

- Doc
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 9713
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: Remembering Building 7

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

BeNotDeceived wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:13 pm
Marcus wrote:
Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:56 pm

All of them. Now please answer my question, what's up with recycling all this very, very old and completely debunked nonsense? Is this some sock puppet just fooling around?
What, government shills easily fooling people with less than avg. IQ's with junk science and hypotheses to support their conclusions? 😅🤢
These guys see a sort of vainglorious end game where their conspiracy gnosis is something they figured out, while the rest of us are dupes. For example, once you start getting down to the nuts and bolts of, say, executing a black ops controlled demolition that requires massive coordination across all federal agencies that’s so sophisticated only ‘independent researchers’ will be able to figure it out, well, there you go.

They also never really think about the new set of problems that arise out of their solution set, in that if the “deep state” was willing to kill thousands of Americans to enact their, I dunno Satanic Jewish takeover Christian America, why are they still alive? BeNotDeceived doesn’t really think this through. How so?

Well. The NSA now monitors the Internet since the Patriot Act was enacted. They’d pick up key words from people posting on sites like this. This would kick in a flag, and a spylord would review his post, see that he figured it out, and kick it up the chain of command for review and action. Some higher ups tasked with quieting sleuths would coordinate with the Department of Homeland Security, and create an op where a task force would be put together to take him out. Using his IP address they’d figure everything about him and his identity and they’d set up surveillance, an information gathering team, and then eventually pick a way to kill him. Heart attack injection, botched robbery, car wreck, sniper, whatever. He’d be dead.

But for some reason working out the details of their reality never really seems to interest them..

- Doc
:roll:
Post Reply