I Chuckle Every Time Exmormon Prophet RFM, Bill Reel and The Backyard Professor Beg For My Money!

[Binger]

Nah. I accept the conditions and treat you accordingly. The conditions are as Atlanticmike described them, which is fine. And you are welcome to ban him or me or anyone else at any time. In the meantime, just keep doing what you are doing and getting what you get.

'Banning' is entirely up to you and your conduct, with regard to board rules. Same as for anyone else. I'm sure that you can manage yourself accordingly.
: D

I believe that you believe that.

It has nothing to do whatsoever with conducting oneself with regard to board rules. It never has been about that. Jesus. How many board rules have been changed in the last 6 months? And a new forum too? Atlanticmike and I got banned for following the rules too much or too closely for hellsakes.

It has EVERYTHING to do with conducting oneself with regard to the board conditions, including not pointing out the actual board conditions. It is fine to read Doc's comment and move along, the board expects him to behave like that. It is not fine to read Doc's comment and continue the conversation about Doc's comment or tell him to eat a sandwich made of his own feces and die. The same can be said about political ideologies, Daniel C. Peterson (as a topic) and whether or not you (canpakes) are actually the single biggest needling troll on the board, and not Atlanticmike.

Anyways, panny. Whatever. You will just say that you know I am and ask what are you, right?

[Marcus]

you're not a person who disagrees, you're a troll. You've flipflopped so many positions and lied about so many things, which you have to do because your goal is simply to disrupt, not participate. Your last dozen or so posts show that explicitly. I thought a troll would try to disguise their trolling at least a little, but recently you've just flat out admitted your only goal here is to disrupt communication. It's a tantrum that is disgusting to watch. What a shameful way to misuse and abuse the internet. You can try to destroy our community but you won't succeed. We'll just have a little more trash to sweep up. Now run off and play your little games, you sociopath. You're not worth my time.

And there it is!! Exactly what I’ve been describing! Thank you for being honest. Your post says it all actually! Everyone here knows if a poster comes along and joins this board then offers up a differing opinion, the troll label is tattooed on their forehead...

Yea, keep telling yourself that. (the rest is just too much blather and nonsense to even try to read through. When you start foaming at the mouth, you should stop typing. )

But back to the point, you're a troll because your only intent is to disrupt. It has nothing to do with having a different opinion than anyone else. There is plenty of disagreement here, which you would know if you were here with actual intent to participate, not try to destroy. But, carry on. Continue making a fool of yourself.

[Binger]

You're a troll because your only intent is to disrupt.

Disrupt what?

Can trolls also assimilate, submit and comply? Can trolls also facilitate?

Take for example, attempting to initiate actual assault in real life with a poster on the board, is that disruptive or is that assimilation? If the moderators and admin tolerate or encourage invitations for in real life assault, or if they allow, encourage and participate in insults, are they the trolls or is the person that does not assimilate, submit and comply with the assault and insults the troll? Who gets to decide?

Marcus, you seem to think that any form of rejection of the dominant ideology and accompanying insults, either by aggression, mockery or dialogue, is trolling.

[Marcus]

You're a troll because your only intent is to disrupt.

Disrupt what?

Can trolls also assimilate, submit and comply? Can trolls also facilitate?

Take for example, attempting to initiate actual assault in real life with a poster on the board, is that disruptive or is that assimilation? If the moderators and admin tolerate or encourage invitations for in real life assault, or if they allow, encourage and participate in insults, are they the trolls or is the person that does not assimilate, submit and comply with the assault and insults the troll? Who gets to decide?

Marcus, you seem to think that any form of rejection of the dominant ideology and accompanying insults, either by aggression, mockery or dialogue, is trolling.

It's not clear what you mean, bingy, please explain more about how internet communication and trolls work.

[canpakes]

'Banning' is entirely up to you and your conduct, with regard to board rules. Same as for anyone else. I'm sure that you can manage yourself accordingly.
: D

I believe that you believe that.

It has nothing to do whatsoever with conducting oneself with regard to board rules. It never has been about that. Jesus. How many board rules have been changed in the last 6 months? And a new forum too? Atlanticmike and I got banned for following the rules too much or too closely for hellsakes.

It has EVERYTHING to do with conducting oneself with regard to the board conditions, including not pointing out the actual board conditions. It is fine to read Doc's comment and move along, the board expects him to behave like that. It is not fine to read Doc's comment and continue the conversation about Doc's comment or tell him to eat a sandwich made of his own feces and die. The same can be said about political ideologies, Daniel C. Peterson (as a topic) and whether or not you (canpakes) are actually the single biggest needling troll on the board, and not Atlanticmike.

Anyways, panny. Whatever. You will just say that you know I am and ask what are you, right?

You're concerned about obscenities, and the direction of political ideologies?

For someone so disturbed by language, a casual check of just 3 popular obscenities reveals nearly 100 instances appearing within posts of yours present on the board now. And, do you need a link to any number of threads where you basically lost your mind while trying to muck up a conversation between others?

Likewise, if you're concerned with 'political ideologies' not being what you want everyone else to think, then make better arguments, instead of throwing tantrums.

You have to get your own house in order before whining about everyone else; no one is going to take you seriously otherwise.

[Atlanticmike]

And there it is!! Exactly what I’ve been describing! Thank you for being honest. Your post says it all actually! Everyone here knows if a poster comes along and joins this board then offers up a differing opinion, the troll label is tattooed on their forehead...

Yea, keep telling yourself that. (the rest is just too much blather and nonsense to even try to read through. When you start foaming at the mouth, you should stop typing. )

But back to the point, you're a troll because your only intent is to disrupt. It has nothing to do with having a different opinion than anyone else. There is plenty of disagreement here, which you would know if you were here with actual intent to participate, not try to destroy. But, carry on. Continue making a fool of yourself.

The proof is there! Just go back and read post before I got here. Subgenius = troll. Ajax = troll. Mental Gymnast = Troll. And so on and so on! It’s all right there in the posting history. Conservative = troll! And once the troll label is tattooed on the conservatives forehead, everyone understands what to do when posting about the conservative. It’s a character assassination from that point forward. Shades perfectly understands what I’m saying that’s why he’s asking me to change because he knows there’s absolutely no way in progressive hell you guys have the ability to let an outsider in your tight-knit progressive community. That’s why Doc Cams Spirit Prison post is still in the terrestrial. He’s the enforcer, Shades understands that and he also understands if he tries to go against the progressive cabal, he would lose a large portion of his followers. It really is that simple!

[Atlanticmike]

I believe that you believe that.

It has nothing to do whatsoever with conducting oneself with regard to board rules. It never has been about that. Jesus. How many board rules have been changed in the last 6 months? And a new forum too? Atlanticmike and I got banned for following the rules too much or too closely for hellsakes.

It has EVERYTHING to do with conducting oneself with regard to the board conditions, including not pointing out the actual board conditions. It is fine to read Doc's comment and move along, the board expects him to behave like that. It is not fine to read Doc's comment and continue the conversation about Doc's comment or tell him to eat a sandwich made of his own feces and die. The same can be said about political ideologies, Daniel C. Peterson (as a topic) and whether or not you (canpakes) are actually the single biggest needling troll on the board, and not Atlanticmike.

Anyways, panny. Whatever. You will just say that you know I am and ask what are you, right?

You're concerned about obscenities, and the direction of political ideologies?

For someone so disturbed by language, a casual check of just 3 popular obscenities reveals nearly 100 instances appearing within posts of yours present on the board now. And, do you need a link to any number of threads where you basically lost your mind while trying to muck up a conversation by others?

Likewise, if you're concerned with 'political ideologies' not being what you want everyone else to think, then make better arguments, instead of throwing tantrums.

You have to get your own house in order before whining about everyone else; no one is going to take you seriously otherwise.

Again! You weren’t concerned when Binger and I weren’t here and Doc Cam was pooping all over the board calling conservatives mushroom this and mushroom that! You rather enjoyed watching him insult conservatives didn’t you? Again, the only difference between what I’m doing and all the conservatives did before me is, I’m not taking my foot off the pedal. They gave up after being insulted 2000 times. They surrendered! Because that’s what’s going on here! Two sides waiting for the other to surrender, correct?

Hey pancakes! You’ve had 12 hours to remove Doc Cams Spirit Prison post, but it’s still here in the terrestrial. Everyone knows if I wrote that post in the terrestrial, you would remove it within the hour and ban me for a month!

[Binger]

Disrupt what?

Can trolls also assimilate, submit and comply? Can trolls also facilitate?

Take for example, attempting to initiate actual assault in real life with a poster on the board, is that disruptive or is that assimilation? If the moderators and admin tolerate or encourage invitations for in real life assault, or if they allow, encourage and participate in insults, are they the trolls or is the person that does not assimilate, submit and comply with the assault and insults the troll? Who gets to decide?

Marcus, you seem to think that any form of rejection of the dominant ideology and accompanying insults, either by aggression, mockery or dialogue, is trolling.

It's not clear what you mean, bingy, please explain more about how internet communication and trolls work.

Sure. Largely, they work like you work. The content of their posts is not as relevant as the reaction to their posts. Since the rules are interpreted and applied using metaphors, let's just apply a sports cliché, if you do not mind. A troll, either on the gridiron, the pitch or the hardcourt, is the role player whose intent is to subtly pester the opposition and not get caught for doing anything too bad. No yellow flags, yellow cards, or personal fouls. But, they are trying to instigate a major reaction from the opposition that would generate a yellow flag, yellow card, personal foul which would result in an award for being a victim of the reaction.

That is what is going on here. You like to think that Atlanticmike is trolling, or that I am trolling. Certainly, at times, that is true. That is not universally true. Ironically, there is a request to build the board better or to not tear it down (metaphors again) and this conversation is an extension of that metaphor. In order to blend in or assimilate, one could or should, just insult the everloving hell out of Daniel C. Peterson, Trump voters and anyone that does not comply with the accepted ideology. Similarly, one could just accept those conditions and be quiet or lurk. In order to not be disruptive, one could either accept Docs' epithets or never say anything that would get Doc's attention. One could just go along with panny's moderation or twisting/reversing of the content and fit right in. For those that agree with you, Doc and panny, that would not be trolling at all.

Addressing your trolling, insults and conditions with force or even aggression is not something you like. If someone creates a fake persona that goes along with the ideology but in a lampooning kind of way (see early Cultellus posts that are mostly gone) you do not like that either. It is no different than a poster/lurker not liking your trolling and insults and having to choose whether to just leave, or tell you to pound sound. Typically, people do not stick around to smash back at the status quo.

Why is this relevant here? Easy. There is a common connection to Mormonism. There is a common thread in Terrestrial related to the apologists, where this board is a proud anti-apologist public oversight crew. And in this process, they have weaved in a bizarre hostile left wing goon posse to defend the board and any infiltration by anyone that is not willing to be as rabid about the apologists and Trump as them!!!

When someone comes along and says, hey, this is interesting, but damn, my mom goes to church still and she voted for Trump, maybe y'all are wrong about her being cult-believing serial killer - all y'all unleash the goons and trolls, get a troll moderator, get rid of sock puppets, start a new sacred forum, split threads like unwashed fine hair and ban people for reporting posts. And, that is all kind of interesting, frankly. Very, very interesting.

[Binger]

I believe that you believe that.

It has nothing to do whatsoever with conducting oneself with regard to board rules. It never has been about that. Jesus. How many board rules have been changed in the last 6 months? And a new forum too? Atlanticmike and I got banned for following the rules too much or too closely for hellsakes.

It has EVERYTHING to do with conducting oneself with regard to the board conditions, including not pointing out the actual board conditions. It is fine to read Doc's comment and move along, the board expects him to behave like that. It is not fine to read Doc's comment and continue the conversation about Doc's comment or tell him to eat a sandwich made of his own feces and die. The same can be said about political ideologies, Daniel C. Peterson (as a topic) and whether or not you (canpakes) are actually the single biggest needling troll on the board, and not Atlanticmike.

Anyways, panny. Whatever. You will just say that you know I am and ask what are you, right?

You're concerned about obscenities, and the direction of political ideologies?

For someone so disturbed by language, a casual check of just 3 popular obscenities reveals nearly 100 instances appearing within posts of yours present on the board now. And, do you need a link to any number of threads where you basically lost your mind while trying to muck up a conversation between others?

Likewise, if you're concerned with 'political ideologies' not being what you want everyone else to think, then make better arguments, instead of throwing tantrums.

You have to get your own house in order before whining about everyone else; no one is going to take you seriously otherwise.

LMAO!

I am not concerned about obscenities, no. Did I say that? Oh, panny panny.

[Binger]

They surrendered! Because that’s what’s going on here! Two sides waiting for the other to surrender, correct?

Wrong. I disagree. Though, this is just on the use of the word, not your interpretation of what is going on here.

Surrendering to the facts or real conditions, is a good thing. A damn good thing.

Extreme submission to things that are not okay, even as a means of keeping the peace or maintaining that status quo - that is a bad thing. And that is what happens here and what is expected here. Submit, and submit now!

Unless and until you say that Al Gore is your president, and Greta is your other president, you will be a so-called troll here. Unless and until you give Daniel C. Peterson a wedgy and accuse him of making your mother watch FOX news, you will be a troll. And if you do not toe this line, panny will respond to your posts incessantly about YOU and then call YOU the troll.