I'm asking you what exactly it was you saw in the article,.with a quote, that supports your reaction?Binger wrote: ↑Tue Aug 23, 2022 6:19 pmIs that what you love? Or, you could read the article and the headlines and the comments for what they are, without being a smug ass. That is an option.honorentheos wrote: ↑Tue Aug 23, 2022 4:01 pmYou have to love it when a person who believes everyone is being lied to by the media posts an article that screams one thing but whose content doesn't support the headline unless you first believe the headline then squint hard.
Clearly, the narrative is not being controlled by the DOJ or the FBI. That is because they played loose and now the whole process is loose.
Do you believe everyone is being lied to by the media, hono? That seems to be your point, correct? I think that is your point.
My point is that the media is taking sound bites from "anonymous sources" LOL!!!!!!!! And my point is that I believe that the media is not lying to me when they say that they want the sources to remain anonymous to me, but not to them, or maybe to them to, but anyways, it is anonymous.
Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
-
- God
- Posts: 4349
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:15 am
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
-
- God
- Posts: 9710
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/agenc ... r-AA110iye

- Doc
So. That’s not great.Among the materials in the boxes are over 100 documents with classification markings, comprising more than 700 pages. Some include the highest levels of classification, including Special Access Program (SAP) material

- Doc
-
- God
- Posts: 6500
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 12:34 am
- Location: That's the difference. I actually have a Blue Heeler
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
honorentheos wrote: ↑Tue Aug 23, 2022 9:56 pmI'm asking you what exactly it was you saw in the article,.with a quote, that supports your reaction?Binger wrote: ↑Tue Aug 23, 2022 6:19 pm
Is that what you love? Or, you could read the article and the headlines and the comments for what they are, without being a smug ass. That is an option.
Clearly, the narrative is not being controlled by the DOJ or the FBI. That is because they played loose and now the whole process is loose.
Do you believe everyone is being lied to by the media, hono? That seems to be your point, correct? I think that is your point.
My point is that the media is taking sound bites from "anonymous sources" LOL!!!!!!!! And my point is that I believe that the media is not lying to me when they say that they want the sources to remain anonymous to me, but not to them, or maybe to them to, but anyways, it is anonymous.
My reaction was this:But a dozen days later, Wall informed Corcoran that she had the blessing of Biden to overrule those privilege claims and share all materials requested by the DOJ and FBI.
"The White House Counsel's Office acquiesced in an extension of the production date to April 29, and so advised NARA," she wrote. "In accord with that agreement, we had not yet provided the FBI with access to the records when we received your letter on April 29, and we have continued to refrain from providing such access to date.
Now, you can also see cocky docky posting links with his pictures. He has a lot of pictures. So many pictures. Looks like has one that is a sad. Have you stopped and looked at all his pictures, hono?
So, MSNBC is running at the mouth with a story about 700 pages in 15 boxes. (think about that, you clowns.) How many pages fit in a box? More than 50? Jesus Christ.
The White House, the DOJ and FBI got a warrant to go after a political foe. Simple. And the White House, DOJ and FBI are choosing to play this out with cutesy leaks and anonymous sources to their favorite monkey performers, again, LOL!!!!!!! And people are aloud to laugh out loud at the White House, DOJ, FBI and the suckers.
If in fact there is real smoke and real fire. Great. So why the clown posse?
- Doctor Steuss
- God
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:48 pm
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
[deleted... realized I'm probably talking out my southern trombone]
-
- God
- Posts: 6500
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 12:34 am
- Location: That's the difference. I actually have a Blue Heeler
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
Do you know this for a fact, or is this just speculation?Doctor Steuss wrote: ↑Tue Aug 23, 2022 10:22 pmOn the plus side, knowing what we know of Trump, they're more likely things like copies of his transport plans (because, they have his name on it, which makes them a shiny object) than nuclear war reaction plans.Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Tue Aug 23, 2022 10:10 pmhttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/agenc ... r-AA110iye
So. That’s not great.
- Doc
Those anonymous leaks are as Pavlovian as those damned lockdown/vote checks that were sent in the mail.
-
- God
- Posts: 9710
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
I saw your op, and actually you could be onto something. Presidential movements probably fall under a SAP or two with regard to to certain aspects like tech, comms, and personnel. You had a moment of pure intelligence.Doctor Steuss wrote: ↑Tue Aug 23, 2022 10:22 pm[deleted... realized I'm probably talking out my southern trombone]
- Doc
- Moksha
- God
- Posts: 7860
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
- Location: Koloburbia
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
Has Hannity tried advancing the idea that Trump thought those classified nuclear documents could help him brush up on high school physics, and maybe build a warhead with the help of the Mar-a-Lago kitchen staff?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
-
- God
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2022 2:51 am
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
Has anyone see Binger support his idiotic lie that the FBI "kicked" the doors down at Mar-A-Lago?
He claims it was just a metaphor, but this is a lie. Kicking the door down is quite literally what happens in raids, which this wasn't, but Binger has described it as such several times. He's also embarrassed himself whining constantly about people making assumptions when his rants here are entirely assumption driven. Here's a list just from the first few pages:
"The FBI did not raid Hillary or Hunter's private residence and there was a hell of a lot more known evidence in those cases and a hell of a lot more of a cover up."
Assumptions: Binger assumes to know how much evidence there was against Hillary and how little there is against Trump. He does this to drive in his preferred narratives of "cover ups" because that's what these uneducated keyboard warriors do. They haunt the internet with their presence and bombard it with idiotic conspiracy mongering.
"The FBI just ignored the dudes and women that were banging kids on an island, went along with the Steele Dossier hoax, shrugged at a laptop full of evidence of collusion, and served a political hit for papers to put in an archive, allegedly."
Assumptions: Binger assumes the FBI ignored something because the FBI hasn't given him detailed access to any investigation that they may be doing. He also assumes the Steel Dossier was a hoax because FOX News keeps telling him so, and he also believes the laptop he's never seen is "full of evidence of collusion." And finally he keeps repeating this assumption that the FBI search warrant was over nothing more than putting "inconsequential" files back into the archives.
"Do you have the details from the warrant that suggest the FBI was sent to Mar-A-Lago to raid a home in order to retrieve evidence of treason against the USA, AND do you have the details from the warrant that the evidence could not be retrieved except by a home raid?"
Assumptions: Binger assumed this was a gotcha question when he asked this just days before the details of the warrant were produced, proving he is wrong in all his assumptions.
"Quality and quantity of evidence to show that they had to kick down a door to get some stuff for the archives and that this was the only tool they had left. Yep. In the meantime, we never had enough evidence to figure out who was harming those children but dang, we gotta take care of these archives."
Assumptions: Binger assumes this was a raid. He also assumes they kicked in the door. When it was proven that this never happened he tried to back peddle saying he was just being metaphorical. Metaphor for what? To reinforce the fantasy he's conjured up about the FBI.
"We have a fentanyl crisis and a border crisis but that can wait because some people in Washington need us to serve a warrant on Trump over some boxes for the archives."
Assumptions: Binger assumes the FBI is so incompetent that it can't multitask. The entire FBI is only allowed to work on one case at a time. And again, these are just "some boxes."
"Kicking doors down is a metaphor for raiding a house"
Not it isn't. It is an apt description of something that never happened. You said it because you're not interested in "questioning" anything, you're only interested in propagating idiotic conspiracy theories.
He claims it was just a metaphor, but this is a lie. Kicking the door down is quite literally what happens in raids, which this wasn't, but Binger has described it as such several times. He's also embarrassed himself whining constantly about people making assumptions when his rants here are entirely assumption driven. Here's a list just from the first few pages:
"The FBI did not raid Hillary or Hunter's private residence and there was a hell of a lot more known evidence in those cases and a hell of a lot more of a cover up."
Assumptions: Binger assumes to know how much evidence there was against Hillary and how little there is against Trump. He does this to drive in his preferred narratives of "cover ups" because that's what these uneducated keyboard warriors do. They haunt the internet with their presence and bombard it with idiotic conspiracy mongering.
"The FBI just ignored the dudes and women that were banging kids on an island, went along with the Steele Dossier hoax, shrugged at a laptop full of evidence of collusion, and served a political hit for papers to put in an archive, allegedly."
Assumptions: Binger assumes the FBI ignored something because the FBI hasn't given him detailed access to any investigation that they may be doing. He also assumes the Steel Dossier was a hoax because FOX News keeps telling him so, and he also believes the laptop he's never seen is "full of evidence of collusion." And finally he keeps repeating this assumption that the FBI search warrant was over nothing more than putting "inconsequential" files back into the archives.
"Do you have the details from the warrant that suggest the FBI was sent to Mar-A-Lago to raid a home in order to retrieve evidence of treason against the USA, AND do you have the details from the warrant that the evidence could not be retrieved except by a home raid?"
Assumptions: Binger assumed this was a gotcha question when he asked this just days before the details of the warrant were produced, proving he is wrong in all his assumptions.
"Quality and quantity of evidence to show that they had to kick down a door to get some stuff for the archives and that this was the only tool they had left. Yep. In the meantime, we never had enough evidence to figure out who was harming those children but dang, we gotta take care of these archives."
Assumptions: Binger assumes this was a raid. He also assumes they kicked in the door. When it was proven that this never happened he tried to back peddle saying he was just being metaphorical. Metaphor for what? To reinforce the fantasy he's conjured up about the FBI.
"We have a fentanyl crisis and a border crisis but that can wait because some people in Washington need us to serve a warrant on Trump over some boxes for the archives."
Assumptions: Binger assumes the FBI is so incompetent that it can't multitask. The entire FBI is only allowed to work on one case at a time. And again, these are just "some boxes."
"Kicking doors down is a metaphor for raiding a house"
Not it isn't. It is an apt description of something that never happened. You said it because you're not interested in "questioning" anything, you're only interested in propagating idiotic conspiracy theories.
"I am not an American ... In my view premarital sex should be illegal ...(there are) mentally challenged people with special needs like myself- Ajax18
- Doctor Steuss
- God
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:48 pm
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
Sorry Binger, I was slow (way slow) on deleting the post, and must've crossed paths with your responding.
Pure speculation on what the SAP materials were. From my exceptionally brief skim of what SAP goodies are, I think that stuff on plans for Trump's travel would likely be the least damaging. The existence of the SAP materials is in the recently released letter from Wall (dunno why media keeps calling her Steidel?) to Trump's lawyer from back in May. They were in some of the boxes that Trump's team voluntarily transferred to NARA, which seems to be the catalyst for concerns there could possibly be more classified materials still at Trump's residence.
As far as what's come out about the raid, I haven't seen anything about SAP stuff found there.
-
- God
- Posts: 6500
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 12:34 am
- Location: That's the difference. I actually have a Blue Heeler
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
Right on Steuss. Thanks. The queue affected the sequence of these messages.Doctor Steuss wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 3:03 pmSorry Binger, I was slow (way slow) on deleting the post, and must've crossed paths with your responding.
Pure speculation on what the SAP materials were. From my exceptionally brief skim of what SAP goodies are, I think that stuff on plans for Trump's travel would likely be the least damaging. The existence of the SAP materials is in the recently released letter from Wall (dunno why media keeps calling her Steidel?) to Trump's lawyer from back in May. They were in some of the boxes that Trump's team voluntarily transferred to NARA, which seems to be the catalyst for concerns there could possibly be more classified materials still at Trump's residence.
As far as what's come out about the raid, I haven't seen anything about SAP stuff found there.