I just googled it and took a look at a few different articles about nationwide stats and stats by state. Nothing exactly worthy of using for a source to write a paper of my own, but the information at each site was similar, so I accept it as likely valid.doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Wed Oct 26, 2022 7:39 pm
Father Francis wrote: ↑Wed Oct 26, 2022 4:54 am
I've had probably an average amount of committed relationships and sexual partners for a male of my age in the US according to the statistics (by Utah statistics I'm a man whore and have been told as much by TBMs) I've read.
Interesting. Do you have a link?
The increasing incidence of childhood diabetes
-
- Bishop
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2021 12:59 pm
Re: Most disturbing thing I've read. New experiment will mostly hurt minorities.
-
- God
- Posts: 9710
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am
Re: Most disturbing thing I've read. New experiment will mostly hurt minorities.
Wut, yer kwestun dunt make no centsdoubtingthomas wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 9:18 pmWhat explains a 23% gap between single men and women ages 18-25?Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 12:03 amIt seems the sexes have impossible, IMPOSSIBLE I SAY, standards for one another these days.
https://datepsychology.com/how-have-rel ... ten-years/
-
- God
- Posts: 2990
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 6:04 pm
Re: Most disturbing thing I've read. New experiment will mostly hurt minorities.
I'll try again. Singles (ages 18 to 29): 51% male, 32% female.
What explains the gap?
"I have the type of (REAL) job where I can choose how to spend my time," says Marcus. 

-
- God
- Posts: 4349
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:15 am
Re: Most disturbing thing I've read. New experiment will mostly hurt minorities.
Non-hetero relationships.doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 8:58 pm
I'll try again. Singles (ages 18 to 29): 51% male, 32% female.
What explains the gap?
-
- God
- Posts: 2990
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 6:04 pm
Re: Most disturbing thing I've read. New experiment will mostly hurt minorities.
There are more gays than lesbians. Nice try.
What explains the decline after 2017?
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/1 ... 3211057710
"I have the type of (REAL) job where I can choose how to spend my time," says Marcus. 

-
- God
- Posts: 4349
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:15 am
Re: Most disturbing thing I've read. New experiment will mostly hurt minorities.
doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 11:12 pmThere are more gays than lesbians. Nice try.
What explains the decline after 2017?
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/1 ... 3211057710
Between 2015 and 2019, the percentage of 15- to 17-year-olds who said they identified as "non-heterosexual" rose from 8.3% to 11.7%, according to nationwide surveys by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
In addition to the overall increase, the percentage of boys who identified as non-heterosexual rose from 4.5% to 5.7%. For girls, the increase was greater — from 12.2% to 17.8%, the findings showed.
-
- God
- Posts: 2990
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 6:04 pm
Re: Most disturbing thing I've read. New experiment will mostly hurt minorities.
Okay, fine. I stand corrected.honorentheos wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 11:28 pm
In addition to the overall increase, the percentage of boys who identified as non-heterosexual rose from 4.5% to 5.7%. For girls, the increase was greater — from 12.2% to 17.8%, the findings showed.
However, that's not enough to explain a 23% gap between men and women ages 18 to 25.
http://datepsychology.com/how-have-rela ... ten-years/
"I have the type of (REAL) job where I can choose how to spend my time," says Marcus. 

-
- God
- Posts: 9710
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am
Re: Most disturbing thing I've read. New experiment will mostly hurt minorities.
You have a bad habit of ‘Ajaxing’ your google searches because you’re clearly not reading the web pages you link. More often than not these sites undermine whatever stupid-as-crap point you think you’re making. Furthermore, if you’re going to link to a site or web page you should quote the relevant part you think supports whatever stupid-as-crap point you think you’re making.doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Fri Oct 28, 2022 1:28 amOkay, fine. I stand corrected.honorentheos wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 11:28 pm
In addition to the overall increase, the percentage of boys who identified as non-heterosexual rose from 4.5% to 5.7%. For girls, the increase was greater — from 12.2% to 17.8%, the findings showed.
However, that's not enough to explain a 23% gap between men and women ages 18 to 25.
http://datepsychology.com/how-have-rela ... ten-years/
- Doc
-
- God
- Posts: 2990
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 6:04 pm
Re: Most disturbing thing I've read. New experiment will mostly hurt minorities.
I know the author is clearly a feminist. I don't agree with some of his points. However, the data he shared does show a 23% gap.Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Fri Oct 28, 2022 1:52 amYou have a bad habit of ‘Ajaxing’ your google searches because you’re clearly not reading the web pages you link.
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Fri Oct 28, 2022 1:52 amFurthermore, if you’re going to link to a site or web page you should quote the relevant part you think supports whatever stupid-as-crap point you think you’re making.
- Doc
It's right there. Look for the 2021 data of men and women AGES 18-25. Find the table.
Or see this one, it shows a 19% gap between men and women ages 18-29.
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-tren ... americans/
"I have the type of (REAL) job where I can choose how to spend my time," says Marcus. 

-
- God
- Posts: 9710
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am
Re: The increasing incidence of childhood diabetes
Why do you say the author is a feminist, and why didn’t you quote his answer to your question? Also, what makes this guy or his answer to your weird obsessions authoritative?
- Doc
- Doc