Occult philosophy involving magical names given for angels seems rather mysterious and is riddled with a great deal of speculation. Here are a couple of bites that express this exact sentiment:
THE MAGUS, Francis Barrett, London, 1801 wrote:WE must now speak of the characters and seals of spirits. Characters are nothing else than certain unknown letters and writings, preserving the secrets of spirits and their names from the use and reading of prophane men, which the ancient called hieroglyphical, or sacred letters, because devoted to the secrets of God only. They accounted it unlawful to write the mysteries of God with those characters which prophane and vulgar things were wrote. Whence Porphyry says, "that the ancients were willing to conceal God and divine virtues, by sensible figures and by those things which are visible, yet signifying invisible things; "as being willing to deliver great mysteries in sacred letters, and explain them in certain symbolical figures; as when they dedicated all round things to the world, the sun and the moon, hope and fortune; a circle to the heavens, and parts of a circle to the moon; pyramids and obelisks to the fire, a cylinder to the sun and earth.
THE MAGUS, Francis Barrett, London, 1801 wrote:You must know that angelical spirits, seeing they are of a pure intellect, and altogether incorporeal, are not marked with any marks or characters, or any other human signs; but we, not otherwise knowing their essence or quality, do, from their names, or works, or otherwise, devote and consecrate to them figures and marks, by which we cannot any way compel them to us, but by which we rise up to them, as not to be known by such characters and figures, and, first of all, we do set our senses, both inward and outward, upon them; then, by a certain admiration of our reason, we are induced to a religious veneration of them; and then are wrapt with our whole mind into an ecstatical adoration; and then with a wonderful belief, an undoubted hope, and quickening love, calling upon them in spirit and truth by true names and characters, do obtain from them that virtue or power which we desire.
And so, it really does seem to be a bit of a mystery in ascribing a true definition for certain characters given in Jubanladace's name as represented in the Smith Family Parchments. But let's be perfectly clear that these things were had by the Smith's and were considered sacred in the magical use in which they were intended --
treasure seeking. I'm sure Dan Vogel would agree.
THE MAGUS, Francis Barrett, London, 1801 wrote:But the characters which are understood by the revelations of spirits take their virtue from thence, because they are, as it were, certain hidden seals, making the harmony of some divinity: either they are signs of a covenant entered into, and of a promised or plighted faith, or of obedience. And those characters cannot by any other means be found out.
We can be sure the three round circles formed within the name of
Jubanladace are standard icons used to represent or express certain things -- but what? Note the
"Round" is given as the second symbol on the first row in Barrett's chapter on
The Cabala, or Ceremonial Magic:
