Does character still matter in politics?

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 5393
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Does character still matter in politics?

Post by Gadianton »

ceeboo wrote: Do you think that there are some Americans (millions of them perhaps?) that believe the other side represents the danger America is facing and currently faces? That's a serious question that I would be interested in you answering if you're willing.
Oh absolutely. Obsessively. This is more core to the average Republican's worldview than the sanctimony of Trump by miles. Just listen to the Trump friend I linked to earlier threatening to F* all the Democrats in the A* because they've destroyed his country. Yes, Republicans either think that liberals have destroyed the country or will destroy it. This is the core belief of the typical Republican.

Unfortunately, when it comes time to articulate that threat, there's not much meat on the bone. A talking point or two and nothing. There is no Res Ipsa of the Republican party. Nowhere. If I want a coherent, well thought out criticism of whatever it is that's so dangerous about the liberal agenda, there just aren't sources beyond meme pumping and conspiracy theories.

I have a good recent example. I'll let those curious search it out, I'm not going to post a link, but I watched a podcast, an interview with some guy who was apparently high up in the ranks of the Border Patrol. He claims Biden failed to protect the border during the transition from Trump, and he was furiously pro-Trump. He made some very interest points, and about two minutes of his material was specific and unique enough that he convinced me that he was right, that Biden probably did botch it. I'm being a literal generous because factors change, and he didn't take that into account. But he had had this great core insight from his job that he repeated two or three times. So about 10 minutes of solid material. Then he unraveled into the land of conspiracy theories and I fell asleep around the hour mark.

That liberals will destroy America has been the main Republican message since Rush Limbaugh, if not earlier. Others here are better political historians than I am. That Republicans will destroy America has only been a belief I've held since late into Trump's term.
Social distancing has likely already begun to flatten the curve...Continue to research good antivirals and vaccine candidates. Make everyone wear masks. -- J.D. Vance
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 9072
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: When Did Republicans Stop Caring?

Post by Kishkumen »

huckelberry wrote:
Fri Jul 05, 2024 7:58 pm
To allow myself a little color I will observe that I quit watching fox entirely some eight years ago. Without their hourly minute of hate sessions I do not know what terrible things are happening. Well there have been more tornadoes.
Remember that film V for Vendetta? When FOX pundits started to act like Lewis Prothero, you know FOX personalities such as Jeanine Pirro, I could see things were taking a dark turn. Some of these FOX personalities do that fascist propagandist act pretty convincingly.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
User avatar
ceeboo
God
Posts: 1752
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:22 pm

Re: Does character still matter in politics?

Post by ceeboo »

Gadianton wrote:
Fri Jul 05, 2024 9:02 pm
ceeboo wrote: Do you think that there are some Americans (millions of them perhaps?) that believe the other side represents the danger America is facing and currently faces? That's a serious question that I would be interested in you answering if you're willing.
Oh absolutely. Obsessively. This is more core to the average Republican's worldview than the sanctimony of Trump by miles. Just listen to the Trump friend I linked to earlier threatening to F* all the Democrats in the A* because they've destroyed his country. Yes, Republicans either think that liberals have destroyed the country or will destroy it. This is the core belief of the typical Republican.
Personally, I wouldn't say that liberals are destroying the country - But I would suggest that the hard left sure is trying to.
Unfortunately, when it comes time to articulate that threat, there's not much meat on the bone. A talking point or two and nothing. There is no Res Ipsa of the Republican party. Nowhere. If I want a coherent, well thought out criticism of whatever it is that's so dangerous about the liberal agenda, there just aren't sources beyond meme pumping and conspiracy theories.
Do you ever read Victor Davis Hanson? I ask because I just read his article earlier today. It was actually just published today, July 5th, and after reading your post (as well as this thread about character), I was reminded of it. I read a lot of his articles and I think he's brilliant (go figure, right). Anyway, I'm not sure if you will find it to be meme pumping or conspiracy theories, but here it is. I will post the entire article for full context. If you want to share your thoughts about the article, I would be interested to hear them as I am always interested to hear the perspectives of those I differ with politically.

The lies we have lived through
Biden's handlers long ago had determined that masking his feebleness at the expense of the security and safety of the nation was a small price to pay to retain power.

By Victor Davis Hanson -July 5, 2024

(American Greatness) — After last Thursday’s debate, Biden himself laid to rest the Democratic lie that he was robust and in control of his faculties. In truth, he demonstrated to the nation that he is a sad, failing octogenarian who could not perform any job in America other than apparently the easy task of President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief in charge of our nuclear codes.

In 2019, Democratic primary candidates often hit rival Joe Biden for his apparent senior moments and incoherence. During the 2020 campaign, Biden often became in bizarre fashion animated and nasty (“you ain’t black”/“fat”/“lying dog-faced pony soldier”/“junkie”).

His “corn pop” stories were grotesque and had a senile accentuation of his earlier “super-predator” and “clean” black riffs. As president, his mental decline progressed geometrically, in the sense that every three months, Biden became far, far worse than during the prior 90 days. His handlers long ago had determined that masking his feebleness at the expense of the security and safety of the nation was a small price to pay to retain power.

What followed was the most comprehensive deceit in presidential history, analogous to insisting that frail and dying FDR in 1944 was just fine as the November election approached or that Woodrow Wilson was expertly running the country as he lay bedridden and near comatose.

Any who questioned the vigorous Biden narrative was trashed as “ageist.” Special counsel Robert Hur was dubbed a “hack” for accurately describing Biden as so amnesiac he would win nullification acquittal from a sympathetic jury.

An array of court sycophants periodically gave interviews, insisting that the robust Biden was smarter and wiser than ever. His press secretary, Karin Jean-Pierre, helped coin a new slur, “cheap fake,” for any who collated video and audio clips demonstrating that Biden was obviously non compos mentis. Would she say the same today after the about-face CNN panelists reviewed Biden’s serial debate lapses to support their now-opportune advocacy that he not run for reelection? Would she wish to be a passenger in a car driven by Biden?

In sum, the “dynamic Biden” farce was finally laid to rest by a debate, but not before it had served the original leftist Faustian bargain. Under the guise of COVID, an enfeebled and stationary Biden outsourced his entire 2020 campaign to toady journalists and surrogate politicians.

His task was to pose from his basement as the uniter, ‘good ol’ Joe from Scranton,’ serving as the pseudo-moderate veneer for the most far left agenda in recent history. In the bargain, Joe and Jill enjoyed the privileges of power and status, while they farmed out the presidency to an array of former Obama subordinates and the hard left of what is left of the old Democratic Party.

The useful lie continued throughout his presidency, escalating in direct proportion to Joe’s mounting stumbles, brain freezes, rambling, and incomprehensible speech. When our president said something either outrageous or unfathomable, the public was to assume that it was intemperate to attribute his failures to senility.

So, the nation became acculturated to deciphering about 60 percent of what he said and writing off the rest to his never-to-be-spoken-of disability. It was the cognitive bookend to the ruse that FDR was able to stand and walk—although far worse because being wheel-chair bound is not a limitation for a president, whereas cognitive incapacity of Biden’s magnitude most certainly is.

The Biden lie was the crown jewel of a number of other left-wing/media fabrications. The more they spread, the more they seemed absurd, and the more they were refuted—so all the more others took their place and the more their promulgators never apologized but simply moved on to their next one. The common denominator was that all the lies, during their existence, were useful to the progressive project.

The Russian collusion hoax helped lose Trump the 2016 popular vote. Its resumption during his presidency ate up 22 months of his administration during the Special Counsel Robert Mueller farce.

The October surprise laptop disinformation lie may have cost Trump the 2020 election. But it was concocted so that Joe Biden could stare at the debate camera and swear to the American people that Trump was a liar, citing “51 intelligence authorities” who insisted Hunter Biden’s laptop was a likely hallmark of Russian disinformation.

We were asked to believe that clever Russian disinformationists fabricated all the sick photos and selfies of poor Hunter, knew the Biden family’s intimate tensions and fault lines as evidenced in the computer’s texts and emails, and were able to package and deposit the computer to either a Russian operative masquerading as a computer repairment or have it delivered to the supposedly useful idiot. The truth was, the FBI had the laptop during the debate and had long verified its authenticity—and thus kept mum as its brethren intelligence apparatchiks lied to the nation.

What the untruth did not fully reveal was that Biden’s campaign foreign policy guru, Anthony Blinken (the current Secretary of State), cooked up the entire ruse. He enlisted former CIA grandee Mike Morell, who then rounded up on spec the confessed lying duo of John Brennan and James Clapper, who in turn drafted still more deceivers, among them the once esteemed Leon Panetta.

And the lie worked perfectly as envisioned, far better than even Russian “collusion.” The nation was deceived into believing that the “asset” Trump was reduced once again to colluding with Putin to enlist his former KGB soldiers to smear the upright Biden family and thus warp yet another election.

Note that all these lies were never retracted. No one ever apologizes. No one is ever punished, even when the lie is given under oath. No one ever has any regrets. And no one ever has any hesitation to lie again, given the utility of the prior untruth.

We were told by the deceitful Alejandro Mayorkas that the border was “secure” as he deliberately destroyed it and welcomed in over 10 million illegal aliens. That lie survived even the absurdity of years of nightly news clips (“cheap fakes?”) of thousands swarming an open border. And it died only when the 2024 election approached and the Biden administration read polls showing that a vast majority wanted the border closed and illegal entrants deported. Then suddenly, the lie that the border was secure transmogrified into the back-up lie that “Republicans would not help us close the now-insecure border.” Translated into Orwellian terms, the border that was crossed by 10 million was always secure but could have been made even more secure had Republicans joined Democrats to secure what was already “secure.”

We live in an era of lies. Sometimes they are purely political, like the Charlottesville “both sides” yarn. And sometimes they change history, like the fabrications that bats and pangolins, not the communist Chinese Wuhan virology lab, birthed the COVID-19 virus, or the Anthony Fauci contortion that his offices did not fund and help out, stealthily and in circumvention of U.S. law, deadly gain-of-function virology research in communist China.

Yet another lie was institutionalized: the January 6 riot was a full-fledged, carefully planned armed insurrection to overthrow the government. In contrast, the four months in 2020 of killing, assault, arson, and looting that saw over 35 dead, 1,500 injured law enforcement officers, $2 billion in damage, and a federal courthouse, a police precinct and a historic church torched were “cries of the heart” from the oppressed and victimized.

Those untruths ensured that hundreds of mostly naïve protestors who showed up in the capitol soon became convicted felons serving long sentences, while the 14,000 arrested for the 2020 mayhem were mostly released as overzealous but otherwise sympathetic activists.

These lies changed the course of the nation. They are birthed by the incestuous marriage of a Washington-New York political culture and a corrupt media.

The purveyors are Juvenal’s “who will police the police.” They are the administrative overseers in the FBI, CIA, DOJ, and the various cabinets and agencies. They feel they are exempt from any consequences for the damage they do, given that in their day jobs they operate as judges, jury and executioners.

Finally, while all governments lie, the left is far more adroit at it because, in their any-means-necessary/the-ends-justify-the-means credo, they spread supposedly good “lies” that stop the Hitlerian Trump, neuter the creepy deplorables/irredeemables/chumps/clingers or save the good people from the MAGA anti-vaxers and assorted yahoos.

Will the lies continue?

Indeed, they will thrive until the people slash the administrative state of its unaccountable and unelected “experts”; until they indict those in the future like Andrew McCabe, James Clapper, John Brennan and their brethren who lie under oath or to federal investigators; until they ostracize and utterly discredit those like Mayorkas, Fauci, and the Bidens whose deceptions took hostage an entire nation; and until they tune out a bankrupt media, the power cord of the entire Pravda enterprise.
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 9072
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: Does character still matter in politics?

Post by Kishkumen »

Victor Davis Hanson was a passably good ancient historian before he became an ideological hack. I thought he made some decent points in Who Killed Homer?, and I actually wrote him an email expressing my appreciation of the book. Years later I read this piece he wrote comparing Trump to great leaders in the Classical World, and it was jaw-droppingly ludicrous. Can’t say I think much of this fanciful screed either.

Does he document any of his claims? Or are we just to take him at his word? I can see he is full of vitriol, but it reads like more of the same histrionics.

I will say this: I, too, get tired of the baloney about “dynamic Joe” because, yeah, it’s stupid and strikes me as disingenuous at best. But my view is that the expectations that drive it are unreasonable and even dumber. Old men are old men. They behave like old men, and they do not have the vitality and mental acuity of young men. That is where the value of experience should be taken into consideration. Give me an old, experienced leader over an ignorant, amoral, psycho who is a young man any day of the week. Sure, the young guy is full of energy and may be able to learn quickly, but I can’t trust him, and his vitality may only make him a bigger danger. What Trump in his late 70s is supposed to have that Biden in his early 80s lacks, I have no idea. Trump’s brain has been an incoherent cartoonish mess for the past decade, and I see no indication of improvement in any sense or by any measure.

He was president, and he has no idea how tariffs work. And yet THAT is his big idea for making our trade competitors pay us big money? It is just plain stupid, and the right wing pundits who shine that ignorance and stupidity on without apology are much bigger liars than the “vital Joe” crowd.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
User avatar
ceeboo
God
Posts: 1752
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:22 pm

Re: Does character still matter in politics?

Post by ceeboo »

Kishkumen wrote:
Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:49 am
Victor Davis Hanson was a passably good ancient historian before he became an ideological hack.
I have no problem with your opinion. I didn't expect his article to go over well here, I just posted it because I thought of it when I read Gad's post and as I thought of this thread about character.
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 9072
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: Does character still matter in politics?

Post by Kishkumen »

ceeboo wrote:
Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:32 am
I have no problem with your opinion. I didn't expect his article to go over well here, I just posted it because I thought of it when I read Gad's post and as I thought of this thread about character.
Yes, I happen to know something about VDH before his descent into right-wing propaganda. It looks like a bunch of recycled accusations made without evidentiary support. What he brings to the table is his ability to throw in a Juvenal quote, for all the good that does him.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 5393
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Does character still matter in politics?

Post by Gadianton »

Ceeboo wrote:But I would suggest that the hard left sure is trying to.
Could you provide an example of how the hard left is trying to destroy the country?

I really have no idea. I know what some of the typical answers are, but I have no idea if those answers represent yours.
The lies we have lived through
My portrayal of the information sources of the right as pumping only memes or conspiracy was not adequate, but my point, that I have not found the Res Ipsa equivalent on the right, stands. I wouldn't characterize the Hanson piece as meme or conspiracy (it's close in places), but it isn't what I have in mind for quality information either. Hanson is an excellent writer and the article is fantastic rhetoric. There is definitely an abundance of this kind of writing found on the right, and I didn't have it in mind when I wrote my previous post. This is the stuff Dan Peterson is haplessly drawn to and imitates. There is a place for sophistry and polemics and there are similar leftist examples. However, if reading essays like Hanson's are what you consider dutiful research, then no wonder you are so concerned.

Several paragraphs run over with hyperbole, guilt by association, accusations, and irrelevancies. I'll pick a paragraph:
We live in an era of lies. Sometimes they are purely political, like the Charlottesville “both sides” yarn. And sometimes they change history, like the fabrications that bats and pangolins, not the communist Chinese Wuhan virology lab, birthed the COVID-19 virus, or the Anthony Fauci contortion that his offices did not fund and help out, stealthily and in circumvention of U.S. law, deadly gain-of-function virology research in communist China.
It's a Mount Everest of claims, and all entirely irrelevant to his thesis statement that Biden is mentally unfit for office but that this has been covered up. The point is guilt by association, that we should expect lies about Biden's health, given all of the other lies of our times. Somehow, Trump's chief medical advisor, Anthony Fauci, lying about funding gain-of-function research helps us in some way, understand lying about Joe Biden's health? Nothing on his list are even indisputable examples of falsehoods let alone falsehoods intended to deceive. Fauci's "funding" is an open controversy. It is NOT an established fact by any means whatsoever that COVID-19 originated in a Wuhan virology lab, it's certainly not a LIE that it didn't. These are 'deep state' dog whistles. Hey...aren't handlers, rather than cabinet or associates, also straight from the deep state?

I assume he's throwing Trump under the bus with his reference to Charlottesville for token fairness, unless something else happened there, but not even that is an uncontroversial lie. There absolutely could have been good and bad people on both sides, and it absolutely could have been Trump's honest opinion that there were good and bad on both sides -- it's a lot more believable that he thought there were good and bad on both sides than he thought the election was stolen from him. But even if Hanson used election lies as his example, that wouldn't help him, because too many people either believe it or claim to believe it. If you're going to gloss over examples of "lying" in order to make a point that lying is built into our contemporary political fabric, then they need to be examples most readers would agree with. Not examples where each could be argued indefinitely. These examples may be hard to find, true, so even better would be to forgo the guilt by association altogether.

Also note the nice touch of twice associating "communism" with China. More guilt by association. What point is there castigating China as communist rather than just saying "China"? What does it add? Is China even technically communist anymore? It's more guilt by association to make his conspiracy dog whistle sound credible. Wow, what could anyone be thinking undertaking join research with communists? Might have something to do with SARS originating in China, and therefore China being well-positioned to make progress, who knows.
Social distancing has likely already begun to flatten the curve...Continue to research good antivirals and vaccine candidates. Make everyone wear masks. -- J.D. Vance
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 9072
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: Does character still matter in politics?

Post by Kishkumen »

Nice analysis, Dean. The VDH piece is well written garbage. Much like other things he has written in this vein. Long on rhetoric, short on argument and evidence.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
Gunnar
God
Posts: 3096
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:32 pm
Location: California

Re: Does character still matter in politics?

Post by Gunnar »

Dr Exiled wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2024 3:50 pm
How are you going to handle it if Trump is elected come November? Looks likely at this point. It'll be rough? Or probably not as much as you claim, based on how he acted the last time. Sure, some will be fired, but that happens. Frankly, it'll be like the last Trump administration where the insiders work really hard to sabotage his administration, monthly impeachment hearings, and meanwhile Trump will be boasting about how his policies are the best ever, etc. Perhaps, you need to step back and relax a little?
Your apparent lack of concern about the potential consequences of Trump being reinstated is our President brings to mind this video about the citizens of High Brazil in Eric the Viking being totally oblivious to the reality of the sinking of their city. I believe the evidence of the danger to our democracy presented by Trump regaining the Presidency is nearly that stark!
No precept or claim is more suspect or more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.
User avatar
Morley
God
Posts: 2216
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:17 pm
Location: Honoré Daumier, "The Past, the Present, the Future", 1834.⠀⁠

Re: Does character still matter in politics?

Post by Morley »

ceeboo wrote:
Fri Jul 05, 2024 11:32 pm
Do you ever read Victor Davis Hanson?
Thank you, Ceeboo. This explains a lot. It helps to know where someone gets their ideas.

If I remember correctly, in his book, The Case for Trump, Hanson compared Trump to John Wayne's character in The Searchers, where Wayne played the fatally flawed anti-hero, Ethan Edwards. (Ha! Although critics love the movie, it's one of my least favorite Westerns.)

I hate it when Gadianton gains a point with his Hulk Hogan, WWE wrestling, anti-hero theories, but I guess I have to award him one this time.
Post Reply