Jersey Girl wrote:Damnit, Jersey. I thought there was a board rule that forbad us from agreeing on anything...
Sorry about that, your post hit on my "area".
That was meant as a joke, ya know...
Jersey Girl wrote:The government has already stepped in to some degree, Head Start with it's emphasis on parent education is at least a half-hearted attempt. What needs to happen is far more complex than I can address on this screen. One area to address, and keep in mind that even small areas of change cost tons in tax dollars if nothing more than documenting changes alone, is fitness across the extended curriculum, starting in the early years.
Like you said, most of these measures are half-hearted at best. I guess I'm a little impartient and a lot more proactive than most people. When I see a problem I don't bother with half-measures, I fix the problem.
Our education systems got more problems then you can shake a really large stick at, but physical fitness is a good starting point. You're dead on about the educational aspects of fitness though. Teaching not just the students, but the parents as well, would go a long way to help things.
Jersey Girl wrote:We can't regulate parenting,
I don't see why not. We license regulate and license so many other aspects of our culture (driving for example), why not place regulations on parenting and standards defining a minimum level of economic and educational standards for people that wish to have kids. Might throttle back on the grow of the dumbass population. It'd also do wonders for slowing the rate of expansion of the low class and make a reasonable dent in poverty as well. After all, if you can't actually afford to pay for the care and feeding of a child, why should you be allowed to have have one? But that's an entirely different topic.
Jersey Girl wrote: As I stated, an emphasis on fitness in terms of "learning and doing" (even into the cafeteria as you suggest) and in the latter years of highschool, I'd like to see some child development classes as a requirement of the curriculum
I like the idea on its face. It would give teens an idea of what having to care for an infant entails. While it might not do a damned thing to make them think carefully before they start having sex, it'll at least remind them to use condoms/birthcontrol.
Jersey Girl wrote:I'd also like to see an extension of that education in required practical experience that is to say...theory in practice by placing all high school Juniors and Seniors in community service settings in our child care centers so that they can learn just what is needed physically, intellectually, emotionally and socially by the infants they themselves will create. A nice side benefit of that is trading the flour sack infants for real experience of the demands of parenting....really great form of birth control, believe me!
Only if the program was under extremely close supervision. Most teens these days I wouldn't entrust a wet bag of dogcrap to, much less a human life.
Jersey Girl wrote:What we're talking about here is creating widespread social change, coffee. Rome wasn't built in a day and the generational transmission of parenting skills and education no longer exists in this society as norm. What we're talking about, in essence, is letting the government step in and take over the roles previously played out by parents and grandparents. I say that education is the key and that surely can be done without stepping on parental toes.
Education can play a large role in making the changes needed, Jersey. But I'm starting to think that the problems in the system (not just of obesity, but health and education in general) are so wide spread as to need an equally massive change in how we go about doing things.
And yes, I know any solution will be able to happen over night. It's a multi-generational problem, so it'll take a multigenerational solution and the patience to match to correct it.
Jersey Girl wrote:Follow the money, coffee, that's all I can say.... The public school systems that I interact with do employ nutritionists and dieticians whose professional hands are tied by the very beauracracy that employs them.
Yup, like I said. It'll take a lot of changes and a lot of time. One of the things that needs to change is the beaucrats and the system they operate in. From the guy at the school level all the way up to state and federal levels and even over into the corporate vendors that supply the system.
What's really ate up, is I never noticed the US military to have much trouble with any of this. But then, that's the military and we're talking about dealing with civilians.
Jersey Girl wrote:One more thing, coffee....the programs that support the types of issues that we're discussing here have been literally (does the general public know this?) slashed to bits as billions have been diverted to support the war in Iraq. One more time for emphasis....follow the money, it'll make your head explode.
Jersey, don't even get me started on the collasial waste of money, men, and materials that's Dubya's foray into Middle Eastern politics.... I swear to Bob I think that man's just damned determined to suprass Woodrow Wilson as the numberone screwup to ever sit in the Oval Office.