Church previously denied a John Taylor revelation on polygamy now admits it

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
User avatar
sock puppet
First Presidency
Posts: 807
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:29 pm

Re: Church previously denied a John Taylor revelation on polygamy now admits it

Post by sock puppet »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:42 pm
sock puppet wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:09 pm
Mormon God is more just our most immediate forerunner. Ref. The King Follett Sermon. He may have organized earth and then organized ideas into intelligences, then into spirits.
Ideas into intelligences? Where did you get that?

Regards,
MG
Your canon of scripture. Maybe you need poster Darth J to return with his 'Know Your Religion' series. Specifically, Abraham 3:22 "Now the Lord had shown unto me, Abraham, the intelligences that were organized before the world was; and among all these there were many of the noble and great ones;"

So, if intelligences were organized, from what were they organized if not ideas?
"The truth has no defense against a fool determined to believe a lie." – Mark Twain
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5719
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Church previously denied a John Taylor revelation on polygamy now admits it

Post by MG 2.0 »

Moksha wrote:
Tue Jun 24, 2025 8:06 pm
Are current LDS leaders denying the members the means to the Everlasting Covenant and the ability to be with God in the highest level of the Celestial Kingdom?
I don't think so. That would frustrate His plan of wanting his children to become a he is.

One thing that seems to be absent in this discussion is the principle of agency. Revelation is dependent on not only what God will but what man/mankind will live/accept/obey.

I hate to keep harping on it, but I think the key to WHY this is so is layed out in basic form by a post I made back on page four.

Regards,
MG
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5719
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Church previously denied a John Taylor revelation on polygamy now admits it

Post by MG 2.0 »

bill4long wrote:
Tue Jun 24, 2025 8:42 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 1:59 am
You're just a human saying stuff. :lol:
Have you ever known anyone that "says stuff" who wasn't human?
I'm saying that there is no special reason for me to give you any extra consideration in listening to what you have to say above and beyond any other human being who doesn't lay special claim to receiving additional light and knowledge.

And even then, as you well know, that claim should be thoroughly investigated and checked out. A lot of 'stuff' out there that is bogus in part or in whole.

Regards,
MG
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5719
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Church previously denied a John Taylor revelation on polygamy now admits it

Post by MG 2.0 »

sock puppet wrote:
Tue Jun 24, 2025 9:33 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:42 pm

Ideas into intelligences? Where did you get that?

Regards,
MG
Your canon of scripture. Maybe you need poster Darth J to return with his 'Know Your Religion' series. Specifically, Abraham 3:22 "Now the Lord had shown unto me, Abraham, the intelligences that were organized before the world was; and among all these there were many of the noble and great ones;"

So, if intelligences were organized, from what were they organized if not ideas?
You ask a good question for which there is no definite answer. The closest I think we've been able to come to understanding what an intelligence might be is the scriptural references to light and truth.

What that may have looked like, we don't know.

I don't think that there has been any reference to intelligence being synonymous with 'idea'.

Regards,
MG
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5719
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Church previously denied a John Taylor revelation on polygamy now admits it

Post by MG 2.0 »

sock puppet wrote:
Tue Jun 24, 2025 9:29 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:42 pm
sock puppet, your alternative to a creator God is what?

Regards,
MG
Space and energy/matter have always existed.
I don't see how this answers my question.

Regards,
MG
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5719
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Church previously denied a John Taylor revelation on polygamy now admits it

Post by MG 2.0 »

Everybody Wang Chung wrote:
Tue Jun 24, 2025 8:07 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 1:59 am

Again, I would encourage you to read what I've said on page 4 of this thread and in other places and get over the fact that you may not be an expert on this whole revelation thing.

Regards,
MG
I don't know about anyone else, but if MG posted it on page 4 and other places, I'm convinced.
I haven't seen anyone as of yet respond seriously to what I've said.

Regards,
MG
Marcus
God
Posts: 6753
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: Church previously denied a John Taylor revelation on polygamy now admits it

Post by Marcus »

sock puppet wrote:
Tue Jun 24, 2025 8:56 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 1:59 am

You have no proof that the 'revelation process' is not a thing. Again, I would encourage you to read what I've said on page 4 of this thread and in other places and get over the fact that you may not be an expert on this whole revelation thing.

You're just a human saying stuff. :lol:

Regards,
MG
Are you sure that Marcus isn't the giant white toad that bitch slapped Joseph Smith when he first tried to take the gold plates?
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Pretty sure it was a Hofmann Salamander, but then the Book of Mormon Musical sells a Magical Frog Plushy with "this frog will change your life!" embroidered on its plaid belly, so what do I know?!!!!

( Also frog socks. $20.00 )
Image
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5719
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Church previously denied a John Taylor revelation on polygamy now admits it

Post by MG 2.0 »

I Have Questions wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:21 am

For the most part, Mormon Prophets have been shown to be undeserving of the memberships trust.
And again, I think it is important to remember that you are saying this as an outsider. A non-believer. Of course you are going to have a jaundiced view.

And I will say again, I am less than impressed with the fact that you ask questions but don't answer any...very few, anyway.

We don't even know if you're a Christian, do we? Others have not been shy about their Christian beliefs here. Why would you be? (another question)

I, for one, find it helpful to know what a person believes as I'm discussing religious things with them.

Am I alone?

Regards,
MG
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 2105
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Church previously denied a John Taylor revelation on polygamy now admits it

Post by I Have Questions »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:47 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:21 am

For the most part, Mormon Prophets have been shown to be undeserving of the memberships trust.
And again, I think it is important to remember that you are saying this as an outsider. A non-believer. Of course you are going to have a jaundiced view.
I have a factually accurate view. The current leadership have been found to have been wilfully running a fraudulent shell company system to avoid SEC reporting. That’s a fact. They’ve been running a dishonest scheme for decades. Regardless of who says that, it’s accurate.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
User avatar
bill4long
First Presidency
Posts: 813
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2021 3:56 am

Re: Church previously denied a John Taylor revelation on polygamy now admits it

Post by bill4long »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:54 pm
bill4long wrote:
Tue Jun 24, 2025 8:42 pm


Have you ever known anyone that "says stuff" who wasn't human?
I'm saying that there is no special reason for me to give you any extra consideration in listening to what you have to say above and beyond any other human being who doesn't lay special claim to receiving additional light and knowledge.

And even then, as you well know, that claim should be thoroughly investigated and checked out. A lot of 'stuff' out there that is bogus in part or in whole.

Regards,
MG
Do you think Joe did a good job with the Book of Abraham?
Identifying as African-American Lesbian who is identifying as a Gay Man and a Gay Journalist
Pronouns: what/me/worry
Rocker and a mocker and a midnight shocker
Post Reply