Comments on FAIR/MAD

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Sethbag
_Emeritus
Posts: 6855
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Post by _Sethbag »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Scottie wrote:At least here you can attack back without fear of the mod's suspending you.

Which doesn't make for very substantive or very interesting conversation, actually.

Do you really find Scratch One and Scratch Two's interminable admit-that-you-ran-a-campaign-to-smear-Mike-Quinn threads gripping, beyond the first seventy pages or so?

No, but thankfully there are a lot of other posts on this board than just that.
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
_barrelomonkeys
_Emeritus
Posts: 3004
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:00 pm

Post by _barrelomonkeys »

Doctor Steuss wrote:
Steuss (French for “hears voices”)


Or entend des voix. ;)
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Re: Comments on FAIR/MAD

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Gadianton wrote:Just curious what your opinions are on the current FAIR/MAD board. I checked in over there, looking for a thread to borrow from and came up empty handed. Anyone have any idea how happy FAIR/MAD management is with the current state of their board?


Of course they are happy with it. Should they be? No. But are they? Yes, rather in the same fashion as a parent who is, despite his/her better judgment, happy with an underachieving child.

I wonder if the moderating has taken its toll.


Yes, it definitely had.

Most of the contributors in the threads I skimmed through seemed very, very green. The critics are pretty mellow and drowned out by numbers. Maybe there is some revenge for the admins there to relish, but doesn't FAIR/MAD have loftier goals? Given how they are enamored with "scholars"?


Speaking of which, what became of the Pundits Forum? I have not heard anything new or interesting about that in quite a while.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Scottie wrote:At least here you can attack back without fear of the mod's suspending you.

Which doesn't make for very substantive or very interesting conversation, actually.

Do you really find Scratch One and Scratch Two's interminable admit-that-you-ran-a-campaign-to-smear-Mike-Quinn threads gripping, beyond the first seventy pages or so?


I would guess that most find it about as gripping as you and Smac high-fiving each other over irrelevant thread derailments in which you attack Jaybear in utterly juvenile fashion, or toss off derisive one-liners at cinepro, of all people. I certainly know that that level of mature discourse is a real thrill for me.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Mister Scratch wrote:I would guess that most find it about as gripping as you and Smac high-fiving each other over irrelevant thread derailments in which you attack Jaybear in utterly juvenile fashion, or toss off derisive one-liners at cinepro, of all people. I certainly know that that level of mature discourse is a real thrill for me.

As I've noted for a long time, you're not overly interested in reality, so I'm happy to know that your misreading of the thread thrills you. You've got to get some sort of enjoyment out of life, I suppose.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:I would guess that most find it about as gripping as you and Smac high-fiving each other over irrelevant thread derailments in which you attack Jaybear in utterly juvenile fashion, or toss off derisive one-liners at cinepro, of all people. I certainly know that that level of mature discourse is a real thrill for me.

As I've noted for a long time, you're not overly interested in reality, so I'm happy to know that your misreading of the thread thrills you. You've got to get some sort of enjoyment out of life, I suppose.


Wha...? Are you now trying to claim that your jab at cinepro, and your remarks to Jaybear were actually substantive and mature? Face it, my dear Prof. P---the atmosphere at the fittingly named MADboard does not lend itself to quality intellectual discussion anymore than this one or ZLMB. In fact, a strong case can be made that the harsh moderating tactics actually stifle debate at MAD.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Mister Scratch wrote:Are you now trying to claim that your jab at cinepro, and your remarks to Jaybear were actually substantive and mature?

Yes. Enough to have sailed right over your head, apparently.

It's all relative, of course. We're not talking about a graduate seminar on Kant's Kritik der reinen Vernunft, after all.
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

We seem to be morphing into the hip/cool board....I mean DCP is posting over here.....who's cooler than DCP? (Steuss......)
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Runtu
I'm convinced that most of what we see on these boards has more to do with personality and the notion of winning or losing than it does with the validity of Mormonism.


You know, I tend to agree with you Runtu, but what exactly is there to "win" or "lose". That's what I don't understand.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Bond...James Bond wrote:who's cooler than DCP?

Ain't nobody cooler.

But (sorry), it's not contagious.
Post Reply